Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Maryland orders review of Diebold system...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
Epoch Donating Member (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 02:46 PM
Original message
Maryland orders review of Diebold system...
At least Ehrlich did something right. I received this from the Chief of Staff to Sen. Harris who is the Sen. Minority Whip and is a big gun on this issue. Maybe they'll discover that something is actually wrong with these machines. Apparently, they are against the law because of an amendment that Harris got passed which required that these machines have a paper audit trail.

-Epoch



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CONTACT: Shareese N. DeLeaver

Wednesday, August 6, 2003 Henry P. Fawell

(410) 974.2316



Governor Ehrlich Orders Independent Review of Electronic Voting System



ANNAPOLIS - Governor Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr. today directed the Department of Budget & Management and the State Board of Elections to initiate an independent review of the Diebold Election Systems, Inc. electronic voting system that the State is scheduled to install as its voting system this year. Science Application International Corp. (SAIC), under an existing contract for security services with the State, will conduct the review and submit its findings to the State in four weeks.



"Government has no more fundamental obligation than to ensure the integrity of the democratic election process," said Governor Ehrlich. "In an effort to strengthen public confidence in Maryland's election process, I have ordered a thorough, fully-independent review of the Diebold system by a third party leader in information security. I believe this is an appropriate step toward ensuring the voter's fundamental right to an accessible, accurate and accountable election process."



The review will include a test bed using the relevant Diebold hardware and software configurations. The test will be built as dictated by State Board of Elections regulations, standards and procedures developed for polling places. SAIC will review guideline and procedural documentation from the State Board and the Local Boards of Election that used the Diebold system in the 2002 election and conduct interviews with election directors, local IT offices and election judge poll workers. Once adapted to a simulated Maryland election environment, SAIC will evaluate the claims of voting security and integrity vulnerabilities. SAIC's report will be in the form of a risk assessment that addresses identified risks and the State Board of Elections mitigation process.



"I welcome Governor Ehrlich's decision to order an independent review of Diebold's electronic voting system," said Gilles Burger, Chairman of the State Board of Elections. "We at the State Board have confidence in the Diebold system and our tailored implementation methodology. We hold the utmost value in voter integrity and security and take credible claims of vulnerability seriously. We are also a learning organization. We are wholly committed to taking all appropriate steps to safeguard the voters' right to an accurate election process. This review is an important step toward that goal."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. YEAH ! ......
DAMN: .... this train has got a HUGE head of steam and is ROLLING down the grade .....

Bev ? ..... We ADORE you ! ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zan_of_Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Damn
Okay, call me skeptical.

Then, do your own research.

Read twenty or thirty entries on this privately-held company.

Science Application International Corp. (SAIC)

Then tell me you're pleased and really feeling secure about them guarding your elections.

SAIC is tight with the Department of Defense.

They have a DARPA contract. http://www.ausa-ft-mon.org/techWinter2002.htm

One website, and I have no way to know if it's accurate, implies that SAIC was one of a "Pentagon chorus" contracted to overthrow a government in Africa. http://webnetarts.com/socialjustice/rwarchv2.html

They have a Saudi Arabian partner. And, see what they specialize in.

http://www.ap.com.sa/aboutus.htm
Assets Protection Company is a division of Saudi Petro Gas Company, which was established in 1998 by the owners of the International Development Group (IDG) and NAF Group. It is 100% Saudi Arabian owned.

<snip> The company achieved its goal by entering into a syndicated agreement with Science Application International Corp. (SAIC), a U.S. based company represented by its local partner, Saudi Science Application International (SSAI). SAIC, is a global leader of security and safety services and products specializing in US Certified Security Training, Alarm Monitoring Systems, Identification Security Systems, Automated Fingerprinting Identification, Real-Time Facial Recognition Systems, Protective Services and Fire Protection and Safety Systems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Boxes inside boxes.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zan_of_Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Bev Harris has started a thread talking about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC