Republican strategy: Filibuster everything, win in November

[steven johnson]

The Party of No Ideas is now using the filibuster as a routine legislative strategy.

By DAVID LIGHTMAN
McClatchy Newspapers
WASHINGTON -- Senate Republicans are using the filibuster to limit and often derail Democrats' initiatives, paralyzing the Senate and making it nearly impossible to accomplish even the most routine matters.

The filibuster strategy "makes the Senate dysfunctional," said Mark Strand, the president of the Congressional Institute, a nonpartisan research group. That, in turn, blocks the Obama administration's agenda, but it also sours public opinion on Washington, with polls showing clear public disdain for Congress in particular. Republicans think voters will reward them for that in November.

However disruptive it is to governance, their extensive use of the filibuster - extended debate to block a decisive vote - could prove to be a valuable campaign asset this fall. Democrats used similar tactics in 2006 and won enough seats to gain a Senate majority. Now Republicans hope it's their turn.

Since Barack Obama became president nearly 13 months ago, Republicans have made it clear that 60 votes - the number needed to cut off debate in the 100-member Senate - are required to pass not only major Democratic programs, but also many routine proposals. (Democrats controlled 60 Senate seats from July until Feb. 4, when Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., was sworn in.)

"Republicans have ratcheted use of the filibuster up to completely unheard of levels. Look at the things that the House (of Representatives) has passed that can't make it through the Senate. The list just keeps growing," said Norman Ornstein, an expert on Congress at the American Enterprise Institute, a center-right policy organization. The list includes legislation to overhaul health care, which has stalled and isn't a good bet to be revived; global warming legislation; and a bill to overhaul financial regulation.


Republican strategy: Filibuster everything, win in November

[Chemisse]

1. My, they are whistling a different tune now

As compared to a few years ago when they tried (and I think succeeded) in shaming the democrats out of using filibusters as a tool.

Now why is it the democrats just roll over for this shit?

[MichellesBFF]

2. I just don't understand the power dynamic in the Senate

Sigh

[bergie321]

3. You forgot:

3. ??????
4. Profit

[_Demosthenes_]

4. I am curious

What in particular do these filibuster speeches include?
Are they solely to consume the alloted time in a Congressional session?
Or is there any substance to them?

[SteveM]

5. Huey Long purportedly read from the Sears Roebuck Catalog.