Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I have a few closing thoughts about Daschle

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:53 AM
Original message
I have a few closing thoughts about Daschle
I hope you don't mind me posting here, but it seems to be the logical place for post mortems. If I am wrong, let me know.

Daschles's #1 mistake was not being clear about his tax problems and actually hiding them until after his nomination. IF the Obama team had known that they had 3 tax flawed candidates, they might have played the game differently.

They might have altered the batting line-up and had the bigger problem (Daschel) go first. Once they got him through, it would have been difficult to let smaller sums like Geithner and Kellifer get derailed. In for a penny, in for a pound, as they say. I think they would have kept Geithner cos they really wanted him but would have disqualified Kellifer not on her amount but on her putative value and the fact that 3 tax cases was one too many.

So, I think Daschle was ultimately sunk by his own dirty game of accepting a nomination when he knew of his issues while the Obama team didn't. An earlier reveal would have produced a different strategy and he would be HHS Secretary today.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. It may have been
another case of Wall Street first. Public health last. By that I mean, the 'players' making that happen, not Obama. You might be right. But, would we be glad about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. No. I wouldn't have been. It played the only way it could with the cards on the table. nt.-
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. Did they know all three had tax problems?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
countmyvote4real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's not about owing taxes on the car service. That's just stupid.
Edited on Wed Feb-04-09 02:26 AM by countmyvote4real
The company that Daschle worked for provided the car and driver. It's actually their tax DEDUCTION as a business expense unless they directly employed the driver rather than a third party car service. At least that's how I understand it and pay my taxes.

The problem with Daschle was his "ties" to health care companies and the couple million dollars of earned income that could be presumed to be influence. That just doesn't jive with Obama's change in lobbyist house-cleaning policies.

At least, that's how my accountants advise me as I prepare my taxes each year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mackerel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Why vet at all if you're going to miss these problems.
Yeah I know taxes are for us little people.

Seriously Daschel's biggest problem was his apology. He really didn't sound sincere and that's when the calls from constituents started coming in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
thesquanderer Donating Member (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. two different issues
re: "The company that Daschle worked for provided the car and driver. It's actually their tax DEDUCTION as a business expense"

I'm not sure what you're saying here, but whether something is a company's tax deduction or an employee's taxable income are two completely different issues. Something can be either, or both.

A paycheck issued by a company is both a deduction (business expense) and *also* taxable income for the recipient.

A car given by a company to an employee is a deduction (business expense) -- and, as I understand it, *also* taxable as income for the recipient, though only to the extent that the car is used for personal use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC