Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Credentials Committee "Dean 25" could decide Clinton's fate (includes info on the individual 25)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:38 AM
Original message
The Credentials Committee "Dean 25" could decide Clinton's fate (includes info on the individual 25)
Politico: The Dean 25 could decide Clinton's fate
By AVI ZENILMAN | 4/18/08

If, as Hillary Rodham Clinton has suggested, her campaign takes the fight to seat the Florida and Michigan delegations all the way to the Democratic National Convention this summer, the fate of her challenge is all but certain to hinge on 25 individuals appointed to the Credentials Committee by party Chairman Howard Dean.

The Credentials Committee, which also includes 161 members selected from the states based on primary and caucus results, is the 186-member body that will help determine whether to seat the two rogue delegations.

Since it appears virtually impossible for Clinton to win enough of the 161 members to vote out a “majority report” supporting her position — and it is unlikely that Barack Obama will win enough of them, either — the Dean 25 are in a position to hold the balance of power on a procedural matter that could play a pivotal role in deciding the Democratic presidential nomination.

Though these 25 appointees are often assumed to be handpicked Dean loyalists who will take their cues from him on the issue of seating Florida and Michigan, a Politico analysis has found that is far from certain. Many of the 25 are already publicly supporting either Clinton or Obama — and some are barely acquainted with Dean....

What follows is Politico’s guide to the Dean 25, based on interviews with appointees and additional reporting....

http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=60BC4CC7-3048-5C12-007C617E6C969A9E
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well. well, as suspected more of these are for Obama amd yet more can be suspected of being. As
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 10:21 AM by saracat
tj hough Deran hasn't an agenda. Feh. he onl;y appointed barely enough Clinton supporters to "defend his position. What a joke. And my money is the alleged undecided are for Obama as well. This is a disgrace and an attempt to maipulate the sytem while pretending to be neutral. I guess the fact that Dean put Obama as one of the "dean Dozen" now shows his loyalty and lack of neutrality. Dean is self concerned and power hungry as ever MacAukliffe was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The difference is significant since Dean's DNC will be working for Obama 2008 and in 2003-4
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 11:04 AM by blm
McAuliffe was already working for Hillary2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. oooh such a real difference. NOT. Dean was already working for Obama in 2004.
for 2008. Why do you think he was in the "Dean Dozen"? Why did this nobody of a state Senator get to make a keynote speech? Double standards again and for the record I can't stand McAuliffe. It just amazes me how so many now espouse the methods they once hated in others.Same old same old. Politics as usual. Bleh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Every Dem was helping Obama in 2004 - he was the Dem senate candidate.
Come on sara - why pretend McAuliffe was doing his job when we all know he didn't WANT Kerry to win and wouldn't lift a finger to strengthen the party infrastructure in states where he had left it to collapse.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC