Edwards may win party's heart in end
DON HUDSON
Think about it. A month ago today, Howard Dean and a fast-closing John Kerry headed into that night's Iowa caucuses as the two front-runners in the Democratic presidential race.
Today it's still a two-man race. Only Dean is out and John Edwards is in.
Somehow, voters sorted through 10 candidates to find the most electable two they had. That's amazing, when you consider how disorganized the Democrats first seemed against the GOP's re-election juggernaut.
My, how things change. A USA Today/CNN/Gallup poll released Wednesday shows Kerry and Edwards holding double-digit leads over President Bush.
Odds are Kerry is the nominee. But Edwards has made an improbable run, proving he deserves to be in the Final Two.
My take is, Edwards needs to win at least two states on Super Tuesday, March 2, -- Georgia and Ohio or New York -- to stay viable. But with Dean out, Edwards has got a chance.
If Edwards can get to March 9, when four Southern states are up for grabs, (Texas, Mississippi, Louisiana, Florida) he might convince Democrats he is more electable, if not more qualified, than Kerry.
Why? Kerry is a Massachusetts liberal -- think Michael Dukakis and gay marriage.
It hasn't worked yet, but Democrats might eventually find Edwards' charisma and poor-boy Southern background more exciting than Kerry's droll maturity.
To win in November, you have to win swing states.
In Wisconsin, a swing state, independents and Republicans crossed over to vote for Edwards. That bodes well for Edwards in November. If, that is, he can get to November.
In June 2001, I had lunch with Edwards, talking about whether he'd run for president. What I remember from that encounter, besides how intense and focused he was, was his mannerisms.
Edwards seemed like so many of us Southerners, born into poor families where our dads started out in textile mills.
More
http://www.charlotte.com/mld/observer/7986836.htm