|
Clark is going to be Kerry's VP. Of course the pundits haven't suggested it much...yet. And Edwards is the challenger du jour these days. But the pundits haven't been right about much so far. Clark is simply the most logical choice. He 's a southerner. He's an "outsider." He was against THE war, but as a career military man, he is definitely not anti-war. He has a large block of dedicated grassroots supporters. He's good looking. He has or is about to endorse Kerry. He's going to be offered something, and I just think it will be VP. I've heard others suggest Sec. of Defense or State (please, no, the current general in this position will be enough for some time, thanks).
Edwards is callow and green, and Rove'll wrap him in bacon and cook him like a veal cutlet. Edwards has boxed himself into a corner with his "goody goody" persona (which I think is fake); much of his support is predicated on it, and if he has to fight dirty to win the election, he will lose that support. Kerry will have no problem getting down in the muck, or finding people to do it for him while he stands above the fray. AWOL, Bush's arrest record and more, though they should have been issues four years, ago, will defintely be issues this time around. Kerry, with the weight of the Democratic party establishment behind him, will take the gloves off, and come out swinging. The GOP keeps winning because they continually put the Democrats on the defensive; they frame the issues, and set the table reserving the best seats for themselves, but the table is about to be turned.
Will Bush, Rove Inc. be stupid enough to bring up Kerry's Vietnam protests? Of course they will, they're already doing it. Do they really want to? Do they really want to bring more attention to Bush's AWOL years? Do they really want to draw more comparisons to Iraq and Vietnam? This issue will be a non-starter for the GOP.
Bush is out.
|