Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Excellent Cle Plain Dealer Op Ed: Computer voting isn't fool-proof

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Activist HQ Donate to DU
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 01:27 PM
Original message
Excellent Cle Plain Dealer Op Ed: Computer voting isn't fool-proof
I hated to edit this, but I had to! http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/othercolumns/index.ssf?/base/opinion/1065951213314010.xml

Computer voting isn't fool-proof

10/13/03

Lawrence M. Krauss

Anyone who was not in a coma in No vember 2000 remembers the agony caused by the now infamous butterfly ballots and hanging chads. Concerns about a possible repeat of events almost caused the California recall election to be delayed.

Following the election debacle in Florida, Congress became determined that in the next elections the winners actually would be determined by all the votes cast. Last October, they passed the Help America Vote Act in order to help states prepare for the next election. Unfortunately, the solutions being proposed, involving an assortment of computer-voting systems, may be worse than the problems they were designed to fix.

I...snip....

In the Science Applications International Corporation report, commissioned by of Maryland (which nevertheless plans to use the Diebold machines in its next election), "several high risk vulnerabilities" were identified - even based on the assumption that the machines are isolated and not connected to the Internet. But in a March primary in California, the Diebold machines were connected to the Internet with election tallies posted on the Internet before polls closed.

...two superb paragraphs....

It is interesting in this regard that Walden O'Dell, the CEO of Diebold, an Ohio company, was quoted in The Plain Dealer as telling Republicans in a recent fund-raising letter that he is "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year."

As we rush to install computer voting systems, we should remember the admonition of a former chief scientist at Sun Microsystems Inc., who said in a television interview following the 2000 election: "If your life depended on the measurement of a single ballot, would you prefer it be read by a machine, or examined carefully by three different human beings?"

...snip....

Krauss is chairman of the physics department at Case Western Reserve University.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. woohoooo.......
Please post this in GD, too, Spike....I think the mods would have no problem allowing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Activist HQ Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC