Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Say NO to "Bunker Buster" Nuclear Weapons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Activist HQ Donate to DU
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 06:19 PM
Original message
Say NO to "Bunker Buster" Nuclear Weapons
An email from FaithfulAmerica.org...

Say NO to "Bunker Buster" Nuclear Weapons

“How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of the messenger who announces peace” Isaiah 52: 7 *


Dear FaithfulAmerican:


IMAGINE - the Horror of Hiroshima - 70 Times Over!

That is what ONE so-called “Bunker Buster” bomb would unleash. You will want to know that the Senate is about to vote on a bill that would fund the creation of this horrendous nuclear weapon.

Calling this level of weaponry a “Bunker Buster” is like calling the bomb used on Hiroshima “a few fireworks.” Let’s name it what it is: An aggressive and treacherous nuclear weapons program. Is this the contribution the United States of America wishes to make to humanity?

Please take a moment and write to your Senator opposing ANY measure to steer our nation down this dangerous path. We have made it easy for you to take action:

Write to your Senator to urge opposition to ANY spending on nuclear weapons, especially the “Bunker Buster.”

(Link: http://ga3.org/campaign/nobunkerbusters)


We also ask that you take a moment and let your friends and colleagues know about this bill using our tell-a-friend feature.

Your voice DOES MATTER! Last year, the Administration requested $27.6 billion in order to develop a new generation of nuclear weapons. FaithfulAmericans all over the nation spoke out against funding the weapons, and Congress listened. The entire request was denied, and not a penny went toward new nuclear weapons. Let’s keep our voices strong in Washington.

Blessings to you,

Vince Isner and
Your FaithfulAmerica.org Team


Please pass this info on.
Thanks!
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
jarnocan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. thanks I signed
I find is a bit disheartening when actions seem to just sit here, but discussions get tons of hits. Hopefully it is because everyone or most have already taken the action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thank you for caring enough to take action!
It is indeed disheartening to see this sitting here for 4 days, w/yours as the sole reply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bunker Buster Animation - from the Union for Concerned Scientists
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Detailed Article on Bunker Busters from the Union for Concerned Scientists
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. its already happening.
its already happening.

What do you think the deepest oil well (Chevron) drilled in the Gulf of
Mexico (28,000 + feet)(10 kilometers) and an earthquake have in common?
Chevron Jack #2 Oil Well. Surprisingly, Chevron announced (big
announcement not quiet) info on the well on September 8, 2006 like it
was big news even though the well was completed in 2004.

September 10, 2006 - Gulf of Mexico earthquake. Can you say "bunker
busting nuke test". I have not been able to gather specific info and/or
exact location of Jack #2 oil well, but it is very close to the
epicenter of quake. The USGS puts epicenter at 270 miles southwest of
Apalachicola, FL, which is also about 270 miles southeast of Louisiana.
Articles I have read indicate Jack #2 oil well from 175 miles to 275
miles somewhere south of Louisiana. This is way out there in 7,000 feet
of water.

Estimates of costs based on economic articles I have read would put oil
at $20,000 to $30,000 per barrel and indicate an increase of American
reserves by 50 percent.?????!!! It is not financially responsible, unless...
Crazy claims like "dredging sea floor for manganese nodules". Glomar
Explorer all over again.

Maybe they are using nuke to frac the formation for better recoveries?

Follow the money
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. See articles below for info on past tests and current info.
Edited on Thu Jul-26-07 01:49 PM by bushmeat
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Activist HQ Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC