The new Chrysler Crossfire. WOW! What do folks think?

[Bossy Monkey]

There's one around the corner. These things look fast parked! What do others think? Here's a link:
http://www.daimlerchrysler.ca/CA/04/EN/CHRYSLER/1,,CA-04-EN-CHRYSLER-CROSSFIRE,.html
Admittedly, it's the worst nameplate since Daihatsu Charade, but what can ya do?

[madrchsod]

1. i want one!!!

they are reasonably priced for a Benz-Chrysler specialty product...

[blackcat77]

2. I think they're all ugly.

But that's just me.

My idea of a good looking car is the new Cadillac -- same basic idea but done with sharper edges which I think looks better.

[ScreamingMeemie]

3. and me...I don't like it either.

But I do like Dodge's new wagon. :hi:

[ewagner]

4. In our local showroom

The sales rep had to pry me out of it.........

Wants to make me a good deal for one in exchange for our (actually My wife's) Explorer. Living through Wisconsin Winters without 4-wheel drive is the only thing making me think twice.

[megatherium]

5. it uses petroleum

so how good can it be?

[Lizz612]

6. Ugly back end

The front looks fine to me, but the back, eww!

[Kellanved]

7. more a Mercedes than a Chrysler

And more a Volkswagen than a Mercedes.

Made by Karmann in Germany, AFAIK with a Mercedes engine. Why is this called "Chrysler"? :shrug:

http://www.karmann.de

[Champion Jack]

8. 50k for a car? not in this life

Base MSRP: 47,745.00

[Supormom]

9. The Crossfire?

With my luck it would come equipped with Bob Novak in the backseat! :cry:

[galadrium]

10. They look neat, but

It is a Chrysler... so it will probably break... just my .02

[central scrutinizer]

11. Chrysler makes the ugliest products

The Dodge trucks are butt ugly and most of their cars appear to be modeled on bottom feeding fish like the carp.

[Nomad559]

12. Mustang

I rather have the 2005 Mustang :)

http://www.maximum-cars.com/temp/mustang/