Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More text changes in movies.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 10:40 PM
Original message
More text changes in movies.
Seen some more movies with changed text again.


I been thinking about vengeance, I think I know why I think on such things.

There are some that think being bad is modest, or not thinking doing anything ever matters, they think that everything that 'occurs' is part of the same system and same power, and that system is all the same thing, or all one plan that is somehow perfect. They have no concept of some effects of free will causing some problems.

Or they think that if they have it, that justifies them having it. Those people think that they are suppose to, steal, take, rape, pillage, if they can do it, then it must be that they are suppose to do it. If anything of power says something or shows something, then it must be correct becuase it is of power.


The statements of Paul, about kicking against the goad, and the statement about power not speech, and the comments about being against powers in high places. Side note towers, and Joan of Arc did not build a tower before attacking Paris, although did have a tower for the action before that. Why the discrepancy in effect.

But anyways, they think if someone else works, and they get reward from that, they were suppose to. They think if they have some control over anything, then they are suppose to have that. And they think doing what ever they want without thought of right and wrong is being modest not self righteous.

When I think on vengeance I think on those groups. Not for want of harm, but since it is the only way they can learn. The only way they can learn that it is not the way they think, is for them to be smashed.


Seriously, there are those that think someone that contributes is doing it becuase they are suppose to have the rewards from there actions. They think people are there to serve them. That is the group that thinks most people are bad that are forced to serve them, while they are suppose to be a few people that have everything or what ever they want.


The way I think it works is while they achieve some better effects they are pretty much not interfered with, since they create better effects, even if there reasons for there actions are wrong, they do pass on what is better thoughts. Many do both better things, and don't think they get from everyone, or judge others as only being there to give to them, but also try to contribute to society, so there are many types of people in groups.




Easier to say it in a story.

There is a place with thousands of people, and in the middle of the town is park with tables full of bread. One group is looking for that bread, another knows where it is.

Of the group that knows where it is, some try to tell the people were it is, and get them there orderly, but when they tell someone, sometimes that person sets up a toll both and sells 'where the bread is' They still help people find bread, so they are not smashed, they do better then the group that tells people wrong places to try and horde for themselves, and better then the groups that attack people trying to tell where the bread is. But still they do wrong. They say they are just selling what they learned, and if they weren't suppose to make money off of it, then they never would have been told. They say they are suppose to be in obscene luxury, becuase if they were not, they never would have been told by someone, something they could sell, or never in a position for people to work, for them to make money. They even say they were born into some wealth by some just reward, becuase it allows a rationalization for an unjust society.

So the view of existence is a bit bleak, a few people trying to organize things, some taking some information they find and trying to sell it to make money, and some trying to hide where the stuff is so they can control people.

In that those that know, and think they are suppose to be well off from knowing, and those that want to horde for themselves are the same in character, but different in effect. I think that is why they wont be smashed till later, but are not respected.


Yea that's it, the difference between a son, and a workman.


I don't think that applies to everyone that makes modest income off of some skills or knowledge, but those that use such things first to make money, and incidentally might help someone in doing that. And it would apply all those that think they were suppose to be some way, by not being just with other people in society.


So a slave holder will say the slaves are born to serve him, to break empathy, and many say they can steal or take without proper action, becuase they are suppose to have, and the other people are suppose to give to them. People with that attitude will have to be smashed.



And I am due beer and travel money and many experiences.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC