I have another question.

[RandomThoughts]

I have heard people say on TV what I have posted here. However what I say was also said by many other people in the past, although most of the time I find that out after having said it. And in some cases it could be a change in presentation of what some people said in the past.

But here is the question.

Do I say something, then someone reads it and also says it, or is it that I say what other people say, and they say what I say not from cause and effect, but from some things being both obvious and all over society and in many parts of society.

There is a tendency to want to say that when someone says what you say, they got the idea from you, but that is not provable with most ideas.

However if that be the case what would be the reason for lack of attribution? So it is possible the cause and effect does not exist to create a feeling of lack of attribution, when the same thing is said without cause and effect by many people.

So are the people saying what I posted, saying it because I posted it? probably not, but possible.

So any cause and effect of repeating being the possibility is beyond me knowing for sure. However lack of attribution could create that lack of being sure, and their have been attribution done only in ways that people that have read the post would see, however it should be addressed if it is a conversational transference, and ignored if not, hence why no claim is made from such repeatings even if their may be a claim to be made.

[de novo]

1. Yeah, I think so.

[petronius]

2. I think most ideas are products of their time, and will occur to multiple people at

the same time.

It's when you say things that no one else is saying that you know you're either a genius or a fool...

[RandomThoughts]

3. Most of the things I say I have never heard anyone else say.

Or at least till after I say them.

But that might be more from controlled information sets then from it not being an easy thought.

Here is something I have never heard anyone say.


The comment, "Every hair on your head is numbered, or counted" That verse has an interpretation that is huge.

In 3d computer development the hair was the toughest to model, and it was not till each strand of hair was its own object that 3d hair was able to look real in CGI.

I think that is more of a metaphor, from some flaws in the concept, but that sounds like something a software engineer living today would say, even though it was said 2000 years ago.


So I understand the draw to tron and matrix doctrines, but they seem limited, and do not match some realities, but the best thing to learn from them, is if something spiritual is treating you bad, don't follow it, it will eventually move on to something else or even change its ways. I think that is why people get kicked around for awhile, then eventually they get help from better ideas. And the tron and matrix doctrine has errors in it, basically it seems to be a despair doctrine to make people think it is hopeless, which it is not as shown by many examples in life.

Although again just a metaphor, but it makes sense that those that stand up for right would get dumped by bad, and picked up by good. Unfortunately hard to make a case for self luxury at the cost of others within good realms, so their is a paradox in there. Seems you have to make the whole world better.

:shrug:

I posted about MMOs being a model for society, and in MMOs there was always a few guilds that had the 'purpose' of helping people. And not because the world is an MMO, but because MMOs model the world, it seems that it makes sense that many in the outer worlds would be that way also.

But anyways, really hard to know if your thought that nobody else says is really that unique, or just not said in many places that have the biggest megaphones.

[GReedDiamond]

4. Morphic Resonance, Morphogenetics...

...Rupert Sheldrake.

[UndertheOcean]

5. but , why did you eat your wife ? that is an enigma wrapped in a sandwich.

[RandomThoughts]

7. A question with an unaccurate, nor even associative comment in it.

Although it may say something about your concepts or interpretations, I do not see the concept you are trying to express.

Could you elaborate, if you are capable of doing it, on what you mean by that post and your other post?

If you are unable to explain the meaning of your post, could you explain why you have that limitation?

[UndertheOcean]

8. because I saturate myself , I reach the end point without moving along the passage

and just the act of seeing the end point disinterests me in the passage .

two concepts that are the same.

now explain to me why you fail to see how my words follow

[UndertheOcean]

6. question 2 , duplicated by lucifer of DU code