So which Manning will win tonight?

[lizziegrace]

:shrug:

[taterguy]

1. Danny

[SalmonChantedEvening]

2. Archie.

:hi: ;)

[seabeyond]

3. peyton, ... gotta be. he is my quaterback for fantasy team. nt

[Shell Beau]

4. I have to root for Eli since he played for my team the Rebels.

And of course his daddy did as well. I hate pulling against either one though. They are big names here in MS. I did in last year's Super Bowl though.

[lizziegrace]

5. I was working in the same old house on the Ole Miss campus

where the PR department was located. The day Peyton went to Tennessee was the end of the world at Ole Miss.

I've got my diploma on the wall in my office. University of Mississippi. :-)

[Shell Beau]

6. I knew I liked you!

;)

Yeah, Peyton could've been Ole Miss royalty. Went to Eli instead!

[RandomThoughts]

7. Has anyone been able to rationalize the theft of inheritance

in the bible story of two brothers?

What is the official explanation, interpretation of that?

[lizziegrace]

8. Beats me

I have no idea what you're talking about. I'm talking about football.

[RandomThoughts]

9. LOL you actually do.

There is a story in the bible of two brothers, when the aging father was going to give the blessings of inheritance to the two sons, the mother disguised her one son as the other, by putting animal hair on the back of his hand.

By doing that the father gave the blessing to a different son then he thought he was, and a different blessing to the other, it is then explained by some hatred from divine source, that allowed the blessings to be taken from one brother and given to another by trickery.


Or that's how I remember that story.

It also says effect not intent is most important in that story. Since it disregards his intent, and only speaks of some effect.

It is the story of rationalizing theft and deception by divine province.

Some see it in another way, of divine actions excusing methods of theft and deception to fulfill what is claimed to be divine action.

It can be seen two ways.


It explains why some think they can steal and deceive, and then claim some divine province as their reason. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't, but it explains a mind set in many groups that use claims of divine province to justify actions that are said to be bad in many of their own teachings.

It creates an excuse for a contradiction, and from that makes all laws irrelevant if a person claims divine province. It is the beliefs of both many faithful people, and many anarchist.

[JanMichael]

10. If only they could both lose...nt