Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Somebody has died and in their will left you 10 Fabergé eggs.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 01:44 PM
Original message
Somebody has died and in their will left you 10 Fabergé eggs.
They aren't the high end eggs, they are only worth between $10,000 and $15,000 each. But their value to art lovers and art historians is immeasurable. It is documented that hidden within one of the eggs is a diamond worth 5 million dollars. The diamond was not placed there by Fabergé so it's presence does not increase the value of that particular egg or the collection in general. Art historians have never been able to find out which egg contains the diamond. X-rays, scans, etc. have revealed nothing about the diamonds location within the egg or within which egg it is hidden.

So, what do you do? Keep the collection intact and enjoy it or start smashing eggs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. If it's documented that one egg holds that diamond, then the whole set has that value
So, sell it as a set.

I would, anyway - I'm not a big fan of faberge eggs, and could use the 2-3 million an auction might bring in to invest in something else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The set only has the value of the eggs.
Not of the diamond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. But if it's documented that the diamond is in the set somewhere, then the set has the value
including the diamond.

Sorry, but we have to real with a real world scenario in this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. The documentation is from 1923
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. You know what, I don't like games in which the conditions keep changing,
Edited on Fri Dec-04-09 05:22 PM by Rabrrrrrr
or in which the information needed is doled out selectively and at whim by the originator.

I'm done.

Next time, try asking the question with all the pertinent conditions spelled out first.

What a waste of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is it really documented that there is $5 million, or just a rumor?
I would try and find some way to determine if that diamond is somewhere before smashing. Then....well...$5 million...and I've never really seen the big deal with these eggs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Nobody knows, per haps another owner found out how to get the diamond
without smashing the eggs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Do you know how many eggs there are total in the world?
IF a lot, yeah, I'd smash 10 of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brother Buzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Only fifty
I'd plan a nifty egg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. That's not many...
...may actually NOT smash them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brother Buzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I'd plan an egg hunt and charge a million dollars a head to participate
All money raised goes to a charity of my selection committee's choice. You can join my selection committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. If nobody knows, then it isn't documented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. I would smash them; I have always found them to be incredibly gaudy
very expensive kitsch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. I was really surprised when I saw them the first time at Forbes' office.
Quite disappointing. Gaudy indeed. Incredible skill in making them, yes, but not really all that interesting or fancy as I had expected them to be.

Compared to the jewelery of the Romanovs, they pale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. I've always thought that even Elvis Presley would have found them tacky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. That's always a good litmus test! lol "Would even a southernor find this tacky?"
Edited on Fri Dec-04-09 05:36 PM by Rabrrrrrr
:rofl:

Indeed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Depending on where you live you may have to sell some to pay inheritance tax
If the person who died lived in NJ and the eggs were given to someone who was not a child (lineal descendant) or spouse then 10 eggs valued at $12,500 each would be a total of $125,000 and taxed at 15% or $18,750 (or more if the estate was over $675,000). Taxes for a sibling inheriting the same amount would be $9,900.

So if you break any eggs and find a diamond don't let the lawyer know or you'll pay tax on that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yawnmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why don't you just wait until they hatch?
then you can easily look through the shells for the diamond.
Or are you saying that the diamond would then be in the body of the Faberge chick.
Maybe then you could xray the chick and it would be easier to see the diamond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'd smash all 10 anyways...
iconoclasm as art in its' own right?

Even if there is no diamond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yawnmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. Do a documentary about the diamond and smashing the eggs...
publicize, charge for the viewing.
should be able to recoup some of the cost.

but then again, you could just wait until they all hatch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Al Capon's Egg Vault, hosted by Geraldo Rivera?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. Auction baby!
They are of historical significance so I wouldn't smash them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Same. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bertha Venation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
20. Sell the collection. I need the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
21. I'd keep them.
Diamonds can be made in a laboratory. Fabergé eggs cannot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
23. Shake them? But if Faberge did NOT put the diamond in, then there must be a way...
to get inside the egg for the diamond hider to put it in there, so you should be able to figure out which has been tampered with, or if a part is removable for stowing diamonds, it should also be evident.

I know your point is a values judgement exercise, but like the egg, there is at least one hole in the question as stated.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonekat Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
24. Anybody want some egg fragments? N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
26. If x-rays don't show it, it ain't there. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recovered Repug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. Real diamonds won't show up on x rays.
I suppose that they would show up on ultra sound, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentauros Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. Even if the x-rays don't show the diamond,
they will indicate a space ;)

Ultrasound is but one of many nondestructive testing techniques :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
27. That's better than 10 prairie oysters.
Edited on Fri Dec-04-09 05:40 PM by Fire Walk With Me
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentauros Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
29. Considering the artificial "value" of diamonds
and the fact that the eggs are worth more for their artistic value than the individual materials, I would auction them off.

The other thing to consider is that most if not all of us here do not have the means to properly store, protect and insure such valuables, whereas rich museums and collectors do. Better to get rid of them fast before someone steals them from you.

Also, as has been pointed out, if an x-ray can't see it, then it likely isn't there. Don't forget all the other means of looking inside of solid matter, such as MRI, CAT scan, ultrasound, DOI (Diffuse Optical Imaging), and any of the ones on this list that can be used for forensics of art :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
31. I love those!
although the creamy insides are awful sweet.

Oh wait. I'm thinking of the Cadbury eggs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
32. the diamond only has value if it is sold...
...so there is no loss of value in keeping the eggs intact, as long as you-- and future buyers-- can be assured that one of them really does contain a diamond. So the whole collection is automatically worth the value of the diamond as long as it is kept intact. You can have the collection and the diamond, too!

Need five million dollars? Sell the entire collection to someone who wants 10 eggs plus one diamond.

Remember, YOU must accept that there is indeed a diamond in one of them before there is any payoff for smashing even one-- otherwise, you simply destroy a valuable collection. Assuming you're a rational person, it's likely that another rational person would share your conviction that the real worth of the intact collection is five mil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
34. Sell them at Christie's - Cash is better than eggs right now....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
35. Put them in a garbage bag.
seal it shut. Smash it all together. Throw the entire unopened bag in the trash. I am no great shakes, when I exit this world, I will not be remembered for anything by anyone. This would change that. I bet I would even get a wiki entry. The guy who smashed 10 irreplacable Faberge eggs, then threw away a 5 million dollar diamond.

Ok, not really. Dunno. I am thinking, if it is doccumented to be there, then others would know it and value it. I would auction them seperately and let the egg savers and the diamond covetiers duke it out financially for who's ideology would win out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
36. I would not trade $100,000 to $150,000 on a lottery ticket
Edited on Sat Dec-05-09 01:00 AM by Orangepeel
How many low end eggs are there? One might have a diamond in it (even if it is documented that there was a diamond worth 5 million in one egg once, how would I know it is still there?). I wouldn't trade that much money on the chance that it might be in one of mine.

If each egg were worth $10 bucks I might smash a few.

on edit: I re-read the question. Is it documented that one of my 10 eggs has a diamond in it? I thought it was just some egg. I guess if the odds were that good, I'd have to question the documentation and the likelihood that the diamond might have been removed before I set up the ebay auction. Still, it would sound fishy and I'd almost certainly sell them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inchworm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
38. sell sell sell
that is all

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
39. Sell the entire collection with the documentation...
That way, they would bring more $$$ at auction, someone who appreciates such things and can care for them will get them, and I can go build my house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carlyhippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
40. I would sell to the highest bidder ala Sotheby's auction
Pretty eggs to look at, but a heaping pile of cash to pay off my bills would be even prettier to look at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC