Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My review of 'Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince' (MAJOR SPOILERS!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 10:30 PM
Original message
My review of 'Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince' (MAJOR SPOILERS!)
This is the sixth adaptation of the Harry Potter series of books, and arguably the most crucial turning point in the story, as it is where Harry's days at Hogwarts come to an end in preparation for his journey in book seven. There are a lot of very important things covered here, and some very important questions asked. The question for the viewer is, does this adaptation satisfy a Harry Potter fan, and is it enjoyable on its own merits as a film?
The answer to both of these questions is 'yes, for the most part.'
Rather than dissecting the movie piece by piece, I'll talk about what I liked, what annoyed me, and my overall impressions of it.

WHAT I LIKED (pretty much in order):

1.) TOM FELTON'S PERFORMANCE AS DRACO MALFOY:
For whatever reason, Draco has generally been underused in the films. This time, he has a major role in the story, as one of the main plotlines of the film is his assignment from Voldemort to kill Dumbledore. There are many beautifully shot and moody scenes of Draco brooding, or desperately attempting to repair a vanishing cabinet, in preparation for something he really doesn't want to do but knows he has to. Draco has always been a very unsympathetic character, and the challenge for Felton is to make us feel bad for him. He succeeds. By far, I'd say the parts of the movie involving him are the strongest. Right from the start, he's in way over his head, and he realizes it, but he has no idea who to turn to...he's trapped and desperate, and the audience feels it along with him.

2.) JIM BROADBENT AS HORACE SLUGHORN:
He nails it, quite simply. At first he simply seems a silly character, but as we learn how crucial he is to the plot, Broadbent succeeds in conveying Slughorn's feelings of confusion and shame. The scene where's he's telling a young Tom Riddle about Horcruxes is positively priceless.

3.) THE CAVE SCENE:
The most tense and suspenseful scene in the book is done beautifully in the movie. It's paced perfectly, and the undead creatures that attack were as creepy as I'd hoped they'd be. :)

4.) DUMBLEDORE'S DEATH SCENE:
There were minor changes to this scene from the book, most notably, they took most of the fighting. This is somewhat surprising (especially considering that they shoehorned in an action scene earlier), but it wasn't a big deal to me. However, the confrontation between Dumbledore and Malfoy is done perfectly, and Alan Rickman of course nails Snape as always. I love how Snape is clearly horrified after doing the deed, but suppresses his emotional reaction.

5.) THE PACING:
My biggest complaint about the movies has typically been the pacing. Aside from the first two (which were slow paced), the movies have been too fast paced. I felt this one had it right...it took its time when it needed to, and moved quickly when it needed to. There were a lot of lovely deliberately paced scenes. One of my favorites was a scene which took placed after Ron started going out with Lavender. Harry is comforting Hermione, and the camera pulls out and starts panning up the exterior of the castle. You can seen Ron and Lavender through another window, then finally the camera reaches the top of a tower, where Draco is seen outside, very much alone.

Anyway, there's a lot of other stuff I liked, but those things were my favorites.

Here's WHAT ANNOYED ME:

1.) THE BURNING OF THE WEASELY HOUSE:
An entirely pointless and tacked-on scene. It didn't add anything to the story and felt forced, pointless, and aggravating. What was especially annoying about this scene, is had it been cut out, they could have instead included something actually relevant to the plot. There is PLENTY of story to tell without making shit up.

2.) NOT ENOUGH ON VOLDEMORT'S PAST:
For a movie about Voldemort's backstory, it certainly thin on the topic. I felt like the movie should have had at least one or two more scenes from Voldemort's life, perhaps showing his progression into the freak he became. If they hadn't gone with the house burning scene, think of all the time they would've had for this!

3.) NO SCENES OF SNAPE AS DEFENSE AGAINST THE DARK ARTS TEACHER?:
This was just a shame! I really wish they had left one of these scenes in. :)

I have to say that numbers 1 and 2 were pretty big annoyances for me. However, I really enjoyed the movie overall. I felt it was the best Harry Potter adaptation I've seen yet, and is a pretty good movie on its own. Of course, many people will disagree with me, I am sure. If you've seen it, feel free to offer your opinions here. :hi:

My score:
As a Harry Potter movie: **** (out of a possible five)
As a movie: **** (out of a possible five)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good calls
Draco BLEW ME AWAY...

...and the problem with #6 is that it both has its own internal plots, but it also sets up #7. There were some areas where it fell short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Yeah. What would you say your biggest complaint was?
I'm really glad they decided to split book 7 into 2 movies. They really couldn't do it any other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. overall
I was much impressed with the improvement in acting, especially from Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, and Bonnie Wright (though it's not like she's had much of a chance to act so far). I also felt a much better sense of the tone of the book; there were some well done humorous parts which didn't clash with the darker aspects of the film.

The only complaint (besides the horrible Weasley house scene) that I have beyond yours is that there is even LESS reasoning behind the love interest between Ginny and Harry than in the book, which is amazing considering how deus ex machina their romance took in the first place. It was just, BAM, there it is. I suppose that's what you get with condensing a massive, complex book into 2.5 hours.

Still, all around, i'd have to agree with 4/5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. The Harry/Ginny romance is kind of weird to me.
I would say it's a shortcoming in the narrative of the books. It seems hinted at in book 2 that Ginny had a huge crush on Harry, but other than that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. They obviously left out a lot.
This was most apparent to me in the boat scene, in which we jump directly from pulling the boat out of the depths to stepping out at the destination. I suspect that a three-hour director's cut is in the works.

At this point in the series, translating the thickest books to film simply leaves no room for rehashing the previous stories, and Voldemort is left a (nearly) unseen menace. I'm guessing that we'll get plenty of Voldemort in the last two movies. I believe I've heard that some Minister of Magic stuff has been deliberately held over for the last films.

The burning of the Weasley house struck me as appropriate, foreshadowing the destruction of Hogwarts. Harry first lost the safety of his Dursley home, and now that of his adopted family. It makes his decision to strike out on his own all the more believable, I think. Furthermore, the destruction makes sense in light of Voldemort's command that Harry himself not be harmed by anyone under the dark lord's command. That's how the bad guys work, killing off Harry's allies one by one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Same movie failure as Anakin Skywalker -- Bad guys with no charisma!
What did anyone see in Anakin Skywalker (most especially Padmé Amidala...) or Jack Riddle?

From the movies those two losers would have flunked out of the academy only to end up as bitter burned out animal abusers in a traveling freak show. Both would have died young.

Anakin would have been killed in his sleep by a fifteen year old girlfriend who couldn't take any more of his shit.

Jack Riddle would have been killed by a very angry rooster at a cock fight. His Horcruxes would have ended up in a dumpster to be buried in a landfill where his fractured soul would rot away undisturbed for 9 billion years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RubyDuby in GA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. I was extremely disappointed in the storytelling of this film
I mean they didn't even explain why Snape is called the Half Blood Prince!

The acting is getting better, but they have left out so much that if you haven't read the books, you'll think its ok, but to those who have, you end up leaving the theater going what the hell was that!?!?!

They needed to divide the books into 2 movies since Goblet of Fire. I can't believe that JK Rowling signed off on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RadiationTherapy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Exactly. Horrible choices that truly diminish the clarity of the tale.
Another example is actually one of the best scenes in HBP. Snape, Bellatrix and Narcissa discuss Malfoy and make an unbreakable vow. In the book, there is a short and sharp dialogue between Bella and Snape that highlights the many reasons why voldemort's followers as well as dumbledore's followers do not trust Snape. It would have taken a minute or less to let that flow out. It adds so much color and tension to snape's character. It is unforgivable that Yates blew this scene so completely; and by unforgivable, I mean "CRUCIO!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RubyDuby in GA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Exactly! And don't get me started in them burning down the Burrow.
And where the hell was the Ministry this time? I guess they're just going to leave all that out next time too.
Does Yates think that none of us know the story??? Like we're not going to notice that he's left out huge chunks that happen to be pretty important to tying it up???? :banghead:

I was actually mad when I left the theater on Saturday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RadiationTherapy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Or how about Slughorns party
When snape gets puked on (why?) and proceeds to tell Harry that Dumbledore will be gone the rest of the term with no follow up or indication of what that meant for Harry. Was that supposed to be relevant somehow?

So ham-handed and ridiculous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. sounds just about right!
Broadbent was great! And I agree about Draco. I thought the mood of the film was pretty accurate. And the Weasley House- that was just dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. They left out a MAJOR plot development crucial for Book 7
Kreatur & Harry's inheriting Sirius' house. :grr: But instead we get Harry in an underground diner? :wtf:

I've always loved Felton's portrayal of Draco. Glad to see he got more screen time.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC