Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

JJ Abrams: You changed history, but BROUGHT.IT.BACK!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 03:00 AM
Original message
JJ Abrams: You changed history, but BROUGHT.IT.BACK!
Who's with me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Apparently, not many. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Haha
my thoughts exactly...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mduffy31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm with you
I am a giant Trek nerd and I loved it. I don't care that it doesn't follow exactly as before, anyone who has a problem with it. "GET A LIFE!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rcrush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah he did
Edited on Fri May-08-09 10:58 AM by rcrush
BUT WTF it somehow worked out.


So does this mean there will never be a Lt Saavik? They will never go to Vulcan so Spock and Kirk can duel in the Pon Far ritual?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Well
They said they were moving the refugees onto a vacant colony on another planet.

So one way or another, that planet is the new Vulcan. or New Vulcan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maiden England Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. JJ is a movie God
I scoffed, I doubted, I insulted and I was WRONG.

Should have known that a dude that could make a good film with Tom Cruise in it was a freaking genius...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. i heartily endorse the new film
star trek is fun for the first time since 1991
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Not a big TNG fan?
or was it the following spinoffs that got you down?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTG of the PRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
8. You're damned right he did!
He did the original material incredible justice, yet made Star Trek His own.

Though, the point now becomes, there are two Star Treks - the original Star Trek, and the new Star Trek.

I love them both, for both are very good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
10. My only complaint is that it erases everything that made ST in the first place.
All the ground-breaking stuff from the original series like the City on the Edge of Forever never happens now. Kahn never happens. Nomad never happens. The slat-sucking monster never happens. No tribbles, no Kirak, no Pike as a burn victim, "I'm not going back, Jim," no Spock's Mom. And, probably, no next generation. The only thing left untouched is the Enterprise spin-off of which I seem to be the only fan.

But yeah, except for that, I really liked it. It was a really fun movie, unlike ST TMP, ST V, ST Generations, ST Insurrection or ST Nemisis or every episiode of the original series where Enterprise people are captured by aliens and forced to fight each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I don't think it necessarily does
It just creates an alt time line that runs alongside the previous one.

The stories that will be told from here on out will be from the second newer time line. That doesn't mean that the other one stops or never happened.

There's two Trek lines now. ToT (The original time line) and TnT (The new time line)

That's how I'm considering it anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC