Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Best movie with the worst sequel?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 10:39 PM
Original message
Best movie with the worst sequel?
Successive sequels have a way of getting progressively worse, so let's confine the discussion to first sequels.

One that comes to mind is The Exorcist. Another is Psycho.


Your suggestions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Die Hard
the second one was horrible
the third one was good

but none of them could possibly equal the first one

"I saw it on 60 Minutes"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Good one!
I watched the original again about a week ago. A lot of it seems dated now because it's been copied so many times, but it was still a lot better than I'd remembered.

And the scene with that "60 Minutes" yuppie is just so viscerally satisfying!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
35. The fourth was pretty fun. Nothing tops the first, though. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recovered Repug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
45. When Die Hard 3 was shown on AMC's DVD onTV
it said that DH3 was originally pitched as a Lethal Weapon sequel. Has nothing to do with the topic, but I thought it was interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think I've got this figured out
As warm ups:

Daddy Day Care is a reasonably funny movie; the sequel, Daddy Day Camp, is awful

Some will say Rocky: Rocky II is watchable, Rocky III is prety good, a lot of people like the most recent "Rocky Balboa" - the rest are awful

Godfather III is not a worthy sequel to Godfather II: ditto Force 10 From Navarrone as a sequel to the original The Guns of Navaronne.

I am excluding the Porkys and American Pie sequels from the discussion.


The winner, in my mind, has to be "The Sting II" with Jackie Gleason and Mac Davis trying to pull off being Newman and Redford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elshiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I actually love ALL the American Pie films.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. You generally either love them or hate them as a bunch
Same with Porkys


I also excluded many Disney sequels because they were non-theatrical/STV sequels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elshiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. I agree with you there, although I haven't seen any of the Porky movies.
Yes, there are a lot of weird Disney sequels out there. I saw a pretty awful sequel to "Alladin," when I was helping my mom babysit. I guess you're right in that they don't really count because you only see these movies if you have little kids and you have gotten to the bottom of the barrel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
91. Agreed, it's really the same movie just 3 different times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Mercifully, I had forgotten all about 'The Sting II'
Thanks a lot, you fink.

I thought about Force 10. Even though I haven't seen it in decades, I know that it sucks, especially compared to the first.

Regarding Rocky II et al, I was really hoping to confine the question to first sequels. That is, we can talk about Rocky II but not Rocky IV.


Another one that just occurred to me was The Last Days of Patton. I may be wrong on the title, but IIRC it was a made-for-tv movie showing Patton's demise following the "jeep accident." George C. Scott reprised the role, but it was an unworthy successor to the original.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Jurrasic Park
And what was done in the novel sequence was even worse...dr. Malcolm dies in thecoriginal novel and the excuse for him being alive inThe Lost World was hideous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I read the novel in 91 or so, and I was SURE that I remembered Malcolm dying
Don't the raptors come in through a skylight or something? And didn't Hammond die amid a swarm of Compsognathuseses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Yeah Hammond dies
But I don't remember him coming back in Lost World
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I guess I should have posted a SPOILER ALERT in my subject line
I didn't read the second novel. Actually, I could barely stand Crichton's writing even before I knew anything about his politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie and algernon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
66. the novels
the novels flip who lives and dies. in the first one, Muldoon and Gennero live and Malcolm and Hammond die. To be fair, Crighton also has Malcolm come back to life in the 2nd novel. The ONLY thing the novels have in common with the movies are the names of the characters and the fact there are dinosaurs on an island.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EastTennesseeDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. You win. It's The Exorcist
Yeah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. Caddyshack... hands down.
Edited on Sat Apr-04-09 11:06 PM by gmoney
Ugh... how they could even call it a sequel, who knows?

Unless maybe you consider the Star Wars I, II & III as a sequel to SW, Empire, and Jedi... from gold to turds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Another good one!
Randy Quaid was funny in a few spots, but overall watching it was like getting kicked repeatedly in the stomach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
36. Winner. We walked out of the theater during the sequel.
It was horrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. Back to the Future would be up there.
The first was not the best movie ever, but it was fun and still holds up 20+ years later.

Parts 2 and 3 were atrociously bad, and not even remotely entertaining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recovered Repug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #37
44. The sequels of Back To The Future,
Pirates Of The Caribbean (another qualifier) and The Matrix all have the same problem. They filmed the two sequels at the same time and ended up with a long movie in 2 parts - and neither part very good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. Part of the problem with the Exorcist II: The Heretic, IIRC...
...was Burton's drinking. I recall an interview shortly before Richard Burton's death, in which he talked about films in which he was so drunk, he has little or no memory of actually having made them. One was The Klansman, and the other, I believe, was E II.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. If I'd made a movie that bad, I'd claim to have been drunk, too
Especially if I'd been Richard Burton in all of my previous films!

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. I thought Psycho II was great
Are you sure you're not thinking of III and IV?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Now that you mention it, maybe I am!
I don't think I even knew that there was a IV, but maybe III is contaminating my memory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. The Matrix
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Bravo!
The first was an amazing film brilliantly conceived and exquisitely matched to the tone of the late 90's. The other two films were crap from start to finish.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
20. Nope. The Exorcist wins easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
22. "Gettysburg" was pretty good, if the Civil War interests you...
but "Gods and Generals" was like enduring a root-canal, sans anesthesia, while Amway presentations blare from earphones strapped to yer head...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EastTennesseeDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Would that count?
G&G is technically a prequel.

I would consider Gettysburg more than "pretty good" personally, but your description of G&G is spot on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #23
30. I was thinking in terms of G&G being released after Gettysburg...
and you're right, it was better than "pretty good"...I just wish they would have taken the money/time spent on G&G, and put it into more of what happened on the second day: Peach orchard, etc. But, I suppose the idea was to follow the 20th Maine around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
24. Chinatown
Absolutely perfect movie, no need to see The Two Jakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I agree, and I haven't
China Town was so good that, watching it, I completely forgot that John Huston was the voice of Gandalf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lethe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
26. Escape from New York
or Ghostbusters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Haven't seen Escape from LA, but you're right about Ghostbusters
The second one seemed so obviously desperate and lame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lethe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. well that's what Escape From LA was like
Edited on Sat Apr-04-09 11:29 PM by Lethe
they had Snake shooting hoops on a basketball court, and surfing on giant waves with Peter Fonda

whereas the original took itself semi-serious, the remake was total camp and hyperbole

plus it had Lee Van Cleef.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #26
39. Escape From L.A. is easily one of the worst movies ever made.
As a huge Godzilla fan you'd think camp wouldn't bother me....but fuck that was a dumb film.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lethe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. i agree
Escape From New York was pretty awesome tho

it had a slight level of campiness but enough seriousness to give it credibility
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. Love the first one.
I wanted to be Snake Pliskin after seeing it. After seeing the second one I wanted to kill Snake Pliskin. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
28. Another one: Robocop
Fans of the sequel make all kinds of excuses for it, but I watched it again within the past week, and it's a stinker.

Hell, I'll even admit that I saw it in a theater, such were my expectations. Aside from the genuinely cool design of the Kane cyborg, the whole thing was a terrible disappointment from start to finish.

Fun fact: after Robocop II had a strong debut weekend, Chris Connelly on MTV News said with a smirk, "let's see how it does next weekend." He was not incorrect!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Robocop III was the worstest ever...
Worser than Plan 9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
32. The Whole Nine Yards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #32
53. I've actually never seen either of them. Was the first one good?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stklurker Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #32
68. Whole Nine Yards
Agree.. first one was a riot... 2nd one sucked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
33. Ghostbusters
but, boy, the second one really stunk!

Pee Wee's Big Adventure was really good, the second one was sleep-inducing.

Poltergeist was pretty good, Poltergeist II sucked really bad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #33
52. I totally forgot about Poltergeist II, and not without good reason
The creepy old guy at the door is good, but the rest of the film is horrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wickerwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
34. Raiders of the Lost Ark
Last Crusade was great but the middle one (Temple of Doom?) was just ass from start to finish.

Also, if we don't have to start with the first movie in the series, I'd nominate Aliens -> Alien 3.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #34
51. Alien 3 is a really good film IMO
Much better than it's commonly credited to be. The only unambiguously crappy thing about it is the way they killed Hicks and Newt. At least Bishop got a curtain call.

Alien 3 features some of the finest moments of character in any of the films IMO.


I don't care too much for Last Crusade, either, nor any of the other sequels. Whereas Raiders was a terrific adventure film about a great character, the other three always seem like the result of a studio desperately trying to make a movie about a character like that Indiana Jones guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recovered Repug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
38. Eddie Murphy made a couple that qualify.
Another 48 Hrs (aptly named because it was exactly like the first 48 Hrs except without the humor). Beverly Hills Cop 2 was a clunker. Crocodile Dundee 2 could have remained unmade, too (OK Eddie wasn't in that one but it sucked).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #38
43. Good list...you're right on all three.
Though I'd argue that the first Crocodile Dundee didn't need to be made either.

:hide:

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #38
50. In terms of narrative, Crocodile Dundee II's heart was in the right place
By reversing the sequence of the first (start in Sue's world, end in Mick's), the sequel attempted to give closure to the overall story, and there were some really good moments throughout, once you accept the Crocodile Dundee mythology.

But the sequence with the "punks," including what must be Iggy Pop's worst song ever, was incredibly lame even when the movie came out, when the 80s hadn't yet begun to seem like a big hair nightmare.

You're right about those two Eddie Murphy films, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
40. Hopefully not the upcoming sequel to The Thing.
Edited on Sun Apr-05-09 01:43 AM by Forkboy
But I'm not very confident on this one.

The sequel to the original Godzilla, Godzilla Raids Again (Gigantis The Fire Monster in the States) is pretty weak. Oh sure, I watch it all the time, but that's just because it still has the big guy in it and I'm a G-Junkie. No characters worth a damn, music taken from an older sci-fi film, film speeds that are wrong in the monster fight scene (the film was left fast as they fight, as opposed to filming in it slow motion to give it that sense of mass as they do in every other film), and a drawn out ending sequence that has no drama at all and makes no sense (you can't bury a creature who can breath fire in ice, but maybe that's just me).

It does, however, feature George Takei in the dub uttering the great line, "Oh banana oil!"

For modern day crap it has to be Jurassic Park 2. The third one is no masterpiece, but compared to number 2 it's Citizen Kane.

Oh, and Nightmare on Elm Street 2 sucked hard as well, but even though a lot of people love it I didn't really like any of them, so factor that in. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #40
49. I saw Gigantis within the last year or so
A Pittsburgh program called It's Alive aired it as one of the weekly features, and you're right--it is pretty weak!

Help me out here, by the way: I seem to recall a Godzilla movie that starts with Big G being accidentally liberated from an iceberg. Was that King Kong vs. Godzilla, or am I thinking of another film?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #49
72. You are correct.
King Kong vs Godzilla was it.

Well remembered. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recovered Repug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
46. According to Entertainment Weekly,
Staying Alive is the worst sequel ever. For anyone interested here's a complete list, if you dare.

http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,1169126,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #46
54. Blues Brothers 2000... I'd blocked that from my mind.
The question here is not the worst movie that's a sequel, but what's the greatest quality gap between an outstanding original and its horrid sequel.

I'd argue that despite the spiffy dancing (!), Saturday Night Fever wasn't a very good movie. (I prefered Samurai Night Fever.)

Caddyshack and Blues Brothers were both brilliant, but Caddyshack does suffer a bit because the Michael McKean story is the purported main story, and he has all the lamest bits, and there is the girlfriend with the horrid Irish accent. A lot of the scenes, while funny, are fairly random.

The Blues Brothers, on the other hand, were on a mission from Gawd. And Akroyd himself is directly involved in this desecration of John Belushi's corpse. So, upon consideration, I'd say the greatest quality difference is between the Blues Brothers and Blues Brothers 2000 (which may be indicating that it's 1000 times worse than most "number 2's" so to speak).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coyotespaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
47. Ironically enough, the greatest movie ever had the worst sequel ever
Highlander. The original was a flawless example of what cinema could aspire to; the sequel was absolutely horrid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. There Should Have Been Only One
When I saw Highlander II with a bunch of friends, we decided to stay only because we couldn't believe that it was so bad. Honestly, if you grabbed ten random men and women from anywhere in the world and put them in a room together, they'd make a better film in about four hours.

Truly, Highlander should have remained a stand-alone film. Everything that came after it served only to degrade the original.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rob H. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #47
56. So bad I'd blocked it from my memory
I actually paid to see it in the theater without reading any reviews first. HUGE mistake! They completely dismantled the mythology that had been created in the first film and, voilà, the immortals were actually aliens who had been banished to Earth.

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hong Kong Cavalier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #56
63. Then you didn't see "Highlander II: Renegade Edition"
I had a college friend convince me to watch that, insisting that it "made the movie good".

It didn't.

Oh, they weren't aliens in this new edition. They were time travelers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rob H. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #63
64. Time travelers?!? LOL
As if that was going to magically fix everything that was wrong with the movie? :spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hong Kong Cavalier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #64
73. Time travel would fix everything involved with the movie...
...but I'd have to go back in time and prevent them from making it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mad_Dem_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
55. Grease.
The first one was fantastic; the sequel was atrocious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
57. The UNWATCHABLE, God-Awful Charles Grodin sequel to "A Christmas Story"
It Runs in the Family, also known as My Summer Story...living proof that lightning doesn't always strike twice.

Charles Grodin, Mary Steenburgen and two...that's right, TWO, not one...Culkins.

Charles Grodin ... Mr. Parker (The Old Man)
Kieran Culkin ... Ralph 'Ralphie' Parker
Mary Steenburgen ... Mrs. Parker (Mother)
Christian Culkin ... Randy Parker

http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTIyNjkyMDEwOF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzkwMzMzMQ@@._V1._SX278_SY400_.jpg

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110168/

It is now summer in the Parker family; and the usual amount of numerous events are happening in their separate lives. Ralphie is searching for the perfect top to use to beat the school bully with, the Old Man is in battle with their hillbilly neighbors, the Bumpus, while eagerly awaiting the discovery of the perfect fishing spot, and the Mother is attempting to collect all of the pieces of a glass china set at a local movie theater. Written by Richard Webner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #57
60. My God
I'd never even heard of that abomination.

And I've previously expressed my thoughts re: Charles Grodin here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #60
62. Showtime put it into extra-heavy rotation when it was released...it was on virtually every day.
And the trademark Grodin whining was in overdrive. Seriously. Anyone who's ever watched a Charles Grodin movie and thought "I can't handle this guy's whining" needs to watch this train wreck. It makes his acting in virtually every other movie he's made look like The Collected Works Of Sir Ben Kingsley.

:rofl:

PS: To anyone thinking "Come on, it couldn't have been THAT bad," let me just say "it was."

:toast:

PSS: No, you wouldn't be wrong if you did that.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #60
74. Grodin's been pretty good in a few things...
Catch 22, The Lonely Guy, and Ishtar. Kind of loved his bizarre turn in the horrendous "You Can't Hurry Love"... "schmeckle."

According to IMDB, he's been in one (1) movie since 1994's "It Runs in the Family" -- sounds like a career killer of a film to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. Midnight Run...easily his best.
"I can't fly. These things go down!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
58. Predator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #58
76. I actually like the second one better.
The first one is good, but it's super formulaic. All it is is a variation on a million slasher movies where you isolate a group of people and kill them off one by one until the last man standing saves the day. Don't get me wrong, it's a good movie and I like it, but the second one was just fucked up in a way that appeals to me. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
59. Jaws.
And then Jaws 3 was even worse than 2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #59
61. And don't forget Jaws IV
It was the original "this time it's personal" film!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #59
70. A shark that eats a helicopter didn't do it for ya?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie and algernon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
65. Shawskank Redemption 2: Battle for Mexico
Mexican drug lords kidnap Red and Andy and imprison them deep in the Mexican jungle. Their friendship is tested liked it's never been before. Can they find Redemption in Mexico??


Just you wait, it's coming....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
67. The Passion of the Christ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #67
85. Would that be "Easter: Payback of the Christ?" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
69. The Sting
American Graffiti
Basic Instinct

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #69
88. I don't remember any of those having sequels
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #88
93. yeah, i blocked them from memory, too
the only good they serve is pulling them out for this very discussion...



The Sting II - www.imdb.com/title/tt0086370

Basic Instinct 2 - www.imdb.com/title/tt0430912

More American Graffiti - www.imdb.com/title/tt0079576
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #93
96. I now remember "More American Graffiti".
But I don't remember hearing about the other two, ever.

I can only imagine Basic Instinct 2 must have been a total shitpile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #96
98. Basic Instinct 2 was straight to DVD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
71. Exorcist III, however, was actually very good
Unlike Exorcist II, it was based on a Blatty novel, Legion, which was a sort-of sequel to The Exorcist. Exorcist III's "nursing station" scene is one of the great moments in horror cinema.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
77. the Godfather- Godfather 3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
78. This sequel stinks to high heaven --Alien Resurection..
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118583/

While Alien and Aliens were great, Aliens 3 passable..this thing of a film ruins every single aspect of the first three..

It is a true stinkeroo...stinks, stinks and stinks some more.

five pukes.....:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #78
80. Alien 4 was lousy, but the OP asked for worst *first* sequels
But let me repeat that I am not disputing the awfulness of Alien 4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
79. Major League
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
81. I recall vaguely a sequel to "Gone With the Wind" made in
Edited on Sun Apr-05-09 09:50 PM by Stuart G
the 80s?.(for TV)
..They say that one really stunk. I never saw it, did anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #81
87. I think that Joanne Whaley saw it, but she's about the only one
That's a worthy suggestion, and it wouldn't even have occurred to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
82. There's only one possible answer.
Planet of the Apes

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #82
86. Which was the first sequel?
Beneath the Planet of the Apes? Not the best film, I agree...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #86
89. Beneath, yes
The franchise finally recovered some dignity, but after Beneath, a lot of Apes fans had already tuned out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
83. The Matrix.
Loved the first one. The third, which was supposed to make everything clear, only confused everything even more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiffRandell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
84. Halloween.
The first one was awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
90. Mission Impossible
The first one and the second one had absolutely nothing in common other than the title and Tom Cruise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
92. although I didn't even see the first two movies in the series
I can feel comfortable saying X-Men 3 and the Wolverine spin-off rank up there with the worst sequels as well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_Carcetti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
94. The Blair Witch Project
Edited on Mon Apr-06-09 09:36 AM by Tommy_Carcetti
Despite some people complaining about the shaky camera work, I personally thought the original was a great film, if serindipidiously so. Its low budget and improvised script actually added a lot to its feeling of realism and creepiness. The fact that you never actually got to see the witch on screen, although frustrating to some, was a plus in my book. Left much more to your imagination, which CGI could have never made as scary.

Then they did the sequel at ten times the original budget and a script. It felt like your run of the mill, forgettable Grade B horror film.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #94
99. I thought they were equally bad
It wasn't the shaky camera work that bothered me. I just didn't think it was scary. The ending was particularly dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_Carcetti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
95. Austin Powers
The first one was genuinely funny and original, plus it had Elizabeth Hurley in it. Had they left well enough alone, it would have been perfect quirky little James Bond/1960s culture spoof.

But the second film totally screwed it all up. The opening scene totally ruined the whole point of the first film. A lot of the jokes were simply rehashes of jokes from the first film and lacking in originality. Mike Myers overextended himself in playing multiple characters. The Mini-Me and Fat Bastard characters distracted more than then they added to the story. Too much reliance on scatology and gross out "humor" as to actual humor in the first movie. And Heather Graham, while I certainly wouldn't kick her out of bed for eating crackers, still is no Elizabeth Hurley IMHO, and Hurley did an infinitely better job at acting than Graham, who acted like she was reading off of cue cards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
97. I watched part of Speed this weekend and I did really like that movie
Keanu Reeves was smart to drop out of Speed II

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC