|
My condition had advanced beyond stenosis to cervical spondylotic myelopathy. In other words, instead of just having shooting pains and numbness, I was losing nerve function from the neck down and my prognosis was that if I did not have surgery, I would be paralyzed from the neck down.
Here's my take away. I went to two different surgeons and did a lot of research with the assistance of a doctor who is a relative. What was very scary was that the first doctor's proposed surgery had, according to the literature, little effect in the long term of alleviating the condition. You'd be amazed at how many surgeries that "look logical" to surgeons have never had rigorous cost benefit analysis applied to them. All sorts of surgeries, on being studied this way, turn out not to do much good.
The first doctor wanted to do a spinal fusion. The second recommended a laminectomy. Research showed that the laminectomy would be more likely to be effective, and that's what I had done.
I regained all my nerve function, although on bad days I can get wobbly in the knees. Mild back pain is pretty constant, but I don't really mind it. Overall I'm satisfied with the outcome, although it was very painful surgery and recovery.
Also, I would say the one thing I was displeased about with the surgery was after surgery care. I was very incapacitated in terms of arm strength and upper back strength. That can caused bad posture, muscle atrophy, more deterioration, and further loss of function, requiring more surgery. After the almost non-existent rehabilitation, I hit the gym really hard, and it may be anecdotal, but I credit my own work out and weight training regimen (light weights of course) with reducing the damage done by surgery and helping me recover fully.
That said, I would not have had the surgery if it had been only for pain -- and I had had back pain for at least 15 years before the surgery without anyone diagnosing what was going on (which is why it progressed). It was, however, worth it to avoid being in a wheel chair or worse. The pain after was less than the pain before, but all of these surgeries are pretty drastic, and I'm not sure all or even most surgeries reduce pain; they enhance functionality or prevent loss of functionality. If the patient is looking for pain reduction, he or she can get into an endless cycle of surgeries. Obviously that's not what's happening in your step dad's case, which has to do with function.
But I would say that the wrong initial surgery can also cycles of surgeries. Just be sure to look for peer reviewed cost benefit analysis of the surgery that is being proposed. Get a realistic picture of what the surgery is supposed to accomplish and what it can't accomplish.
Hope this helps and good luck to your step dad.
|