Anybody ever have a 38e^(j*pi) - 4j*sin(theta) convolved through e^kxj in a 2.3 fractal eigenspace

[Rabrrrrrr]

at a frequency of -j*pi^pi Hertz on a hyperbolic spheroid in Schroedinger wave space - way?


I did once, but I got so confused t*delta(x)*e^jk seconds into it, I forgot who I was and what I was doing there.

It took a team of f(x)=e^(-2*pi*cos(theta)*j) physicists almost y = integral from -2 to +18*x^(ej) of f(x) years to piece me back together.

[conscious evolution]

1. Not lately.You're not thinking

of trying it again,are you?
You might want to rethink that.

[conscious evolution]

2. Not lately.You're not thinking

of trying it again,are you?
You might want to rethink that.

[PVnRT]

3. So...imaginary sex?

[mainegreen]

4. I honestly don't know, nor am I sure if I knew, that I would know that I knew.

[MrCoffee]

5. Well duh.

[rug]

6. What is rectal eigenspace?

[MrCoffee]

8. It's the square of the number of squares needed to finish the job.

Is this going to get deleted?

[rug]

9. No but it's a sure bet to get convolved.

[Rabrrrrrr]

11. huh hu huh hunh hu hun huh - you said "convolved", Beavis.

[mikeytherat]

7. pi

Now go forth, and sin no more.

mikey_the_rat

[hobbit709]

10. Possibly, did your mind resemble this?

[KamaAina]

12. Dammit to hell. It was a 2.2 fractal eigenspace.

So close.

[dhpgetsit]

13. Do you come here often?

[arcadian]

14. ...

www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3njjD41f48

[siligut]

15. See, and this is why we can't have nice things.

[jpgray]

16. Schroedinger wasn't a cool enough cat to be name-dropped as often as he is

:P

[SOteric]

19. But Dirac was, and he's almost never name-dropped.

x(

[Orsino]

17. Yeah. I couldn't walk straight for a week after!

It was awesome.

[SOteric]

18. Seriously, dude.

What part of didn't you understand?


P.S. Physics geeks are hot.

[Rabrrrrrr]

20. What is this "+" sign you use? Is this some new math magic of which I am unaware?

I beg of you, mage, you must tell me its eldritch secrets! What is its function? It seems to have some alchemical property of turning two things into one, but how can that be?

You are powerful, wizard, and though I fear and tremble, with dread do I ask you its secrets!

[SOteric]

21. +....%....=....

[1Hippiechick]

22. Yes, but what goes on behind closed doors is considered private between the parties involved. n/t

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

23. I just hate it when that happens.

[pokerfan]

24. I hates convolutions

Once I learned the Laplace transform I never looked back.

[Rabrrrrrr]

25. Yes! In my Circuits I class, we did everything via differential equations,

and it would take pages sometimes to solve a circuit.

Then, in Circuits II, we learned the Laplace, and what had taken pages and tens of minutes now took about four lines and 2 minutes and the frequency response graph took about 8 seconds to draw.

[pokerfan]

26. Yeah, everyone wanted to strangle our professor

But I think it's taught the same way everywhere. They want you to appreciate the transform method.

[LynzM]

28. Yep.

I had the same experience. The "wait, we spent how much time doing it the hard way?!" :hi:

[Starbucks Anarchist]

27. Yes?

[krispos42]

29. Yeah, but the chaffing was incredible

pi² alawys do that to me.

I try to limit my oscillations to pi^1.5 if I have to work the next day.