|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 02:53 PM Original message |
'bout to watch the movie "The Happening". Am I making a big mistake? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
1. i rented if on friday after i swore i was done with him, i still haven't watched it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 02:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Liked his first 2 movies, hated "Lady in the Lake". Heard this is worse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Lady in the water was so bad and The Village was no prize either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 03:00 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Each movie gets worse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 03:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. lemme know what you think if you do watch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 03:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Ok... I'm gonna start it in a few minutes. Wish my luck! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 06:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
27. Awful. No better than a bland made for the Sci-fi channel movie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
6. The guy needs a cock-punch for thinking this is a good movie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 03:06 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. OMG! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie and algernon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
7. yeah, Mark Walberg is a HUUUUUGGE disappointment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 03:04 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. i bet i can bring the movie back and switch it for something else. I'm going to try. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. uh oh.. I paid more than $4 to rent this thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie and algernon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 03:09 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. don't feel too bad, i paid $9.75 to see it in the theater |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. You poor sad chump. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 03:12 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie and algernon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 03:18 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. lol, stupid me thought Walberg was a decent actor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ghostsofgiants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 03:30 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. People put way too much emphasis on who is in the movie... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie and algernon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 04:00 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. i actually like his other movies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ghostsofgiants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 04:10 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. I think he' s one of the worst filmmakers of our generation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I'd have walked out the theatre |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie and algernon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 03:20 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. nah, I just started texting my brother |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leeroysphitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 03:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
21. But, but but... It's M's first "rated R" movie! How could it not be FABULOUS? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 06:38 PM Response to Reply #21 |
29. In the extras on the "The happening" DVD M. night does on & on about the R rating and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ghostsofgiants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
18. Well it is an M. Night Shyamalan movie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onager (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 04:25 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. That's M. Night Charlatan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 06:40 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. Last credit at start of movie: "Written, directed, and produced by M. Night S...." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 06:47 PM Response to Reply #24 |
34. M. Night Charlatan! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 06:16 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. He doesn't build internally consistent worlds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 06:36 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. I agree with your comments. Loved "6th sense" and "signs" but saw the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rbnyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
20. OK...I liked it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 06:39 PM Response to Reply #20 |
30. Slam! lol. It's ok that you liked it. I thought they were both awful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mutley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
25. It was okay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickgutierrez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
31. Probably - but it was the subject of my favorite bit of citizen marketing, ever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-12-08 06:41 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. LOL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC