Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should First Cousins Be Allowed To Marry?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:13 AM
Original message
Poll question: Should First Cousins Be Allowed To Marry?
The word "southern" is in my username, and so I'm NEVER going to hear the end of this one. LOL.

My first cousin (his dad and mine are brothers) is incredibly hot, sexy, kind, intelligent, sensitive, liberal, thoughtful, and sweet. I've had a crush on him since I was about 5.

NO, I AM NOT GOING TO MAKE A MOVE ON HIM! NOT GOING TO HAPPEN IN THIS LIFETIME!

I could never risk my relationship with the only person who has the same last name as me that doesn't resent me for breathing and wish I was dead (yes, the rest of the "family" REALLY DOES hate me that much. They're all freepers, sigh.)

Just, hypothetically. In a perfect world, would it be okay for me to marry Cousin Matt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Chicago Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Can I marry my dog?
Or how about a dolphin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. You can marry your avatar.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. One
presumes that your dog or a random dolphin cannot give legal consent to a marriage.

Your argument is ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. a guy on Jerry Springer married his horse
But I don't know what point you're making.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. actually
Edited on Wed Feb-25-04 01:20 AM by Dookus
first cousin marriages are not outlawed everywhere. Check your state law.

on edit: here's a map of where first-cousin marriage is permitted

http://marriage.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cousincouples.com%2F
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I did. We'd be okay.
I also checked the statistic, and first cousins are no more likely to have genetically abnormal kids than any other couples. :shrug:

Doesn't matter, though. Not going to happen.

I'm never getting married. I am quite unlovable and will spend the rest of my life living alone with a succession of cats, writing books that I hope someone will read. Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I AM SPARTACUS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. well, you ARE a writer...
http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/ASIN/156512104X/ilectricinfop-20/702-8839243-0950465

Right from Wrong
by Cindy Bonner (Author)
336 pages (August 1, 2003)

We're back in the town of McDade, Tex., for another installment in the family saga...There Sunny reconnects with her 14-year-old first cousin Gil Dailey, and they seal their fate with a forbidden kiss. The balance of the novel covers the next 13 years, from 1913 to 1926, with sexually charged encounters between the cousins dotting some otherwise uninspired prose. Sunny marries an alcoholic, abusive husband; Gil goes off to war in Europe. Each tries to forget the other in the arms of various people they don't love; finally, they run off together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. LOL
Thanks.

All I do is dream, though. Matt is way out my league, even if we were strangers or co-workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I AM SPARTACUS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #21
44. now, hold on...
I have a sister, she's a southerngirl-sorta-writer, was in the same boat - single w/ succession of cats, etc...she met-married-lived-happily-ever-after in her 40's. And with the life I've led so far, I can attest to the fact that one can indeed lead a life that seems straight out of a book you don't quite believe but cannot put down.

The alcoholic husband, you could prob'ly forego that part...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. dont worry, im sure youll find somone sooner or later...
that swims a bit deeper in the gene pool than your own cousin anyway.

-LK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosophy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
36. I have the same problem
A coworker of mine offered to fix me up last week on a blind date with someone she knows at the college where she takes night classes, because I am a "good looking, nice, single guy". I told her not to tell the girl that I'm nice, because I'm really not. Needless to say the date didn't happen. :cry:

I'm thinking of writing a book too, I have a lot of free evenings and weekends with nothing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kickin_Donkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
53. LOL
I'm never getting married. I am quite unlovable and will spend the rest of my life living alone with a succession of cats, writing books that I hope someone will read. Sigh.

That's one of the funniest statements I've read in a while. That's the same sort of realistic self-deprecation that I wallow in.

Not coincidentally, I'm also a "writer" but more of a California ethnic writer a la Saroyan or Tan. And as much as I love cats (I have about 15 barn cats sitting outside), I hope not to be a "cat person." (I'm a guy.)

Why must writers be depressive types? I don't know if you're actually depressive, but I think you know what I mean as a kindred spirit.

Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AgadorSparticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
49. that's just lazy!!! 10 billion people in the world. can't find 1
outside your family? :) seriously, i find it utterly gross.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. If you met him (assuming you're hetero), you'd want him.
And you wouldn't care if his dad was your dad's brother or even Rove's brother, LOL.

Thanks for not advocating that I be rendered infertile.

I am seriously never going to get over that comment. On a LIBERAL site. Jesus save me from this filthy fucking planet and take my ass home!! Sigh.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. I've never wanted to marry my cousin...
But I've got some gorgeous female cousins that I've had impure thoughts about. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. only if
both of you are gay. then you'd be less likely to reproduce children that had extra appendages or mysterious powers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. LOL
That's excellent. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. JERRY! JERRY! JERRY!
seriously, theve done that show about 5 times...

-LK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. sure. Only if you were both rendered infertile after the ceremony
so you couldn't send your inbred kids into the world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. there really
isn't evidence that first-cousins produce children with more birth defects than any other couple.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
64. Tru Dat
Discover or SciAM said it has been quite common for wealth american familys to marry inside the family, And that there is little evidence a genetic trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. "rendered infertile" ??
And which branch of government, pray tell, should be in charge of THAT? Or should we out-source it to the cousin-marrying Hitler?

:eyes:

I'll never learn. The people on the screen are not my friends.

SGW, the stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid bitch who lets her guard down WAAAAAY too easily, obviously
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #11
54. Look at the paintings out of Spain and you see why not.
That is if you have children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiviaOlivia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. Sure if you want offspring like Prince Charles
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
14. Information from the link provided above -- thanks!
Fact: No European country prohibits marriage between first cousins. It is also legal throughout Canada and Mexico to marry your cousin. The USA is the only western country with cousin marriage restrictions.

Fact: Children of non-related couples have a 2-3% risk of birth defects, as opposed to first cousins having a 4-6% risk. Genetic counseling is available for those couples that may be at a special risk for birth defects (e.g. You have a defect that runs in your family) In plain terms first cousins have at a 94 percent + chance of having healthy children. Check the links section for more information on genetic counselors. The National Society of Genetic Counselors estimated the increased risk for first cousins is between 1.7 to 2.8 percent, or about the same a any woman over 40 years of age.

Fact: The frequency of cousin marriages in the USA is about 1 in 1,000

Fact: The frequency of cousin marriages in Japan is about 4 in 1,000

Fact: Albert Einstein married his first cousin. And so did Charles Darwin, who had exceptional children.

Fact: Franklin D. Roosevelt, the longest serving US president in history married his cousin (not a first cousin, however they shared the same last name).

Fact: The first Prime Minister of Canada, Sir John A. MacDonald married his first cousin.

Fact: Current studies indicate that cousin couples have a lower ratio of miscarriages -- perhaps because body chemistry of cousins is more similar. The verdict is still out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. didnt hitler also marry his cousin?
Edited on Wed Feb-25-04 01:33 AM by LastKnight
or some other relative? i thought it was his cousin. i could be wrong

-LK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Oh, for crying out loud.
Hitler also:

ate breakfast on a regular basis.

had a dog for a pet.

took walks for exercise.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. No

His girlfriend, Eva Braun, died with him at the end of the war. Some say they were wed shortly before they died. They weren't cousins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. eh o well, im probably thinking of someone else...
Edited on Wed Feb-25-04 01:42 AM by LastKnight
i know there was some opressive fascist that married a relative of thiers... one of those idiots on a 'descendant of pure blood' ego trip kinda thing. that being said... are we sure shub and pickles arent related? lol (sarcasam)

-LK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gyopsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
15. Yuck! No!
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. Do you have an argument
above and beyond "yuck"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gyopsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #23
30. If you plan to do it...
keep it a secret. It's socially unacceptable in this country. I think it's your own business if you decide to marry your cousin but for many people, it seems weird and isn't too much unlike marrying a sibling or an aunt or uncle.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. What part of this was unclear?
NO, I AM NOT GOING TO MAKE A MOVE ON HIM! NOT GOING TO HAPPEN IN THIS LIFETIME!

Were your parents cousins? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gyopsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. Maybe not you...
but some people in this thread seem to be pretty defensive about the subject. Maybe there's a surprising number of people who actually do find romance with their cousins. I honestly didn't think so many people felt that way and I didn't plan to offend anyone with my comment above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. I'm not defensive about first-cousin marriage
I'm defensive about bad logic, poor argumentation and the idea that "yuck" is a reasonable argument.

As a gay man in a committed relationship with a man unrelated to me, it's not a personal issue.

I'm simply saying that "Yuck" as an argument is as bad as people who use "yuck" to argue against gay relationships.

Use a little logic. a little reason. A little argument. "yuck" doesn't count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #35
41. I am defensive.
Not because I have a crush on my cousin, but because of that "rendered infertile" comment. That made my blood run cold.

We liberals can turn into freepers ready to maim our fellow human beings over a personal preference in the blink of an eye.

The only difference between us and them is that we (for the most part) seem to try harder.

That's scary. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gyopsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #41
45. It's gotten worse lately
The last year or so I've noticed a lot more spiteful comments on the DU forum about issues like this. Proves everybody has their demons. Even liberals. I guess to expect all people to be unprejudiced against everything is farfetched. I know, being raised like I was, I do have a natural prejudice against certain issues though I try (sometimes without success) to keep an open mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #45
51. "Spite" is not the half of it, sometimes.
I'm guilty of being probably too direct, too blunt at times. Advocating something that happened in Auschwitz, however, is a little more than I'll ever be guilty of, especially when the "crime" in question is a mildly socially questionable crush.

"Rendered infertile."

I'm definitely not going to sleep tonight.

:scared:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosophy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
24. Genetically, there's really nothing wrong with it
First cousins are genetically distant enough where it shouldn't be a problem, unless your family has a history of genetic disorders. First cousin marriage is actually quite common in many cultures, especially in Arab countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. family history
posts only stupidity and conservatism as genetic disorders.

In fact, Matt and I are sports -- the only people in the "family" who have EVER read a book all the way through (except the Bible).

And I REALLY wish I was kidding about that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosophy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. So being a writer
must make you a heretic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. actually, my freeper mother takes great delight in
hoping that God will let her look down on me as I roast in hell so she can say "I told you so."

Mind you, I'm a Christian. Just not an insane fundy freeper Christian.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosophy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. Freeper family values?
Gloating at the prospect of the eternal torment of one's own children. That would be kind of sad, I guess...if I were a Christian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #24
47. It gets to be a problem with successive generations
if the behavior continues. Even with the off spring of first cousins, you find a reduction in the effectiveness of their immune systems.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #24
61. A 50% greater chance for genetic disorders in offspring is not "nothing"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #61
74. Depends on how high the incidence is in the first place...
if you're talking a defect once every 100,000 births, and that's actually about the rate, then raising that to 1.5 every 100,000 is nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #24
70. Used to be common in the U.S. as well
Edited on Wed Feb-25-04 12:24 PM by SaveElmer
In the 18th and 19th century. With mobility limited, cousins getting married was very common. My GGG Grandparents were 1st Cousins...which make me and my sister 6th cousins...weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
27. think of how odd that would make thanksgiving dinner...
just a thought, i have no problem with it if you want to do it... but... not something im gonna do.

-LK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
31. You can already marry first cousins in some states
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. 'legal under certian circumstances'
odd... what would be the circumstances?

-LK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #33
38. some states
make an exception for people who can't have children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. if there are no or very little genetic side effects...
whats the point of that? well, im done trying to make sense of laws tonight. lol.

-LK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #39
43. The laws were on the books before genetics got to be
such a developed field.

First cousins have the same birth-defect rate as women over 40.

I guess women over 40 should be "rendered infertile."

I will never get over that remark. :scared: :scared: :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #39
46. because of popular perception
that there IS a sizeable increased risk.

There's no requirement that laws be based on science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gyopsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #39
48. I don't think it should be against the law
It really doesn't make any sense.

I would never have relations with my cousins but I don't agree that there should be a law against it. It should be that person's business and that's how I feel about most social issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #38
59. You can in Mississippi--marry a first cousin, that is.
and there is NO EXCEPTION for childbearing ability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArwenJade Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
40. I personally find the idea repulsive
But maybe it's because all my male cousins are ugly. Too bad, cause it looks like it's legal under certain circumstances in my state. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PragMantisT Donating Member (893 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
42. You mean they ain't?
Move to the Ozarks, y'all. We's all cousins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piltdown13 Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
52. I voted "other"
I have no problem with it, it's very common in other cultures both historically and today. But, the only drawback is you have to be a little more careful if there are any known genetic conditions in the family -- overall the risk of problems isn't much more than non-cousin marriages, but it never hurts to double check that any patterns of genetic illnesses in the family don't suggest a potentially higher risk (depending on the distribution of genes in the kindred, there may be no increased risk).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whitacre D_WI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
55. I remember an article...
I read somewhere in one of the online publications I read (sorry I can't be more specific -- Slate, Salon, I can't find it now) that was about cousin-lovin' and the societal taboos against it.

It was a very non-judgmental article, had some great information, and I'm really bummed that I can't find it for you.

Anyway:

I'm never getting married. I am quite unlovable and will spend the rest of my life living alone with a succession of cats, writing books that I hope someone will read. Sigh.

Of course, this part just makes you sound like Harper Lee or Flannery O'Connor; which wouldn't be such a bad thing to be, though I hope lonlieness isn't all the cards hold for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcooksey Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
56. There is a whole website devoted to cousin marriages
Lots of facts at www.cousincouples.com. I stumbled across that while researching same-sex marriage a couple of months ago.

My mom's parent's were first cousins and there's nothing wrong with me. I love people whose only argument against cousin marriages or same-sex marriages is "Yuck!" Yeah, that's real convincing. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
57. I was in love with my first cousin
Edited on Wed Feb-25-04 08:02 AM by Finnfan
Seriously. And she felt the same way. We spent a lot of our teenage years dramatically discussing what we were going to do about it.

Nothing ever happened, though. The relationship remained rated "G" and we remain friends to this day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
58. No...and genetic problems can occur from first-cousin marriage
Edited on Wed Feb-25-04 08:59 AM by jchild
The only couple I know in my home town that were first cousins before they became husband and wife have a son who is mentally retarded.

I don't know if that is the PC term, but he has serious mental retardation.

If you do the Mendelsohn square, there indeed is a GREATER LIKELIHOOD of genetic problems in these kinds of marriages.

Look at Queen Victoria's family and the prevalence of hemophilia.

Edit to add: There is a 50% higher chance of genetic disorder in first-cousin marriage than in the general population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #58
60. It has to be repeated behavior
to produce the effects seen in the Royal family. Also, if there's no family history of genetic disorders, the chance of birth defects is quite low for one couple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #60
62. If two people have recessive genes for a genetic disorder and they marry
And it is far more common for two people in the same family to have recessive genes for the same disorder, then do a Mendelsohn on it. As many as 2 in 4 of the children, or half, have a great chance of having the recessive genes from both parents, thus making the disorder dominant and expressed.

I am not just talking about instances of repetetive interbreeding. 50% greater chance for expression of genetic disorders would be enough for me to decide not to do it...and couples considering it should have genetic counseling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #58
65. Pedantically, I don't think haemophilia would be affected
by marriage to relations. You only inherit it from one parent (unless you are a female sufferer, in which case you must have inherited it from both parents, and your chances of surviving childbirth without medical intervention would be none, I'd think. I don't think there were any female sufferers in the royal family, only carriers).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #65
68. It's an X-linked recessive genetic mutation...
Women have XX, men have XY. Therefore, it has to be carried by one X gene and in the woman and the X gene in the man. It is a genetic disorder that indeed is dependent on one X gene in the mother and one X gene in the man having the trait for hemophilia.

Do the Mendelian square, and you will see that a child of two parents with hemophelia has a great probability of being affected with the disorder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #68
76. Mendelian! I'm glad you cleared that up...
I was wondering what a classical composer had to do with it. I'll restate this, by the way - a 50% elevation of something that's extremely rare - and most birth defects are extremely rare - still leaves you with something that's extremely rare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #76
84. LOL! Well, it was awfully early when I posted this AM
And as far as being rare, I wouldn't want to take the chance with something like Cystic Fibrosis. It might be rare, but LOTS of people have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #68
82. Compare the offspring of a female carrier
in the case of marrying a male sufferer: you get a male sufferer, a male free of the disease, a female carrier, and a female sufferer.
If the mother marries a male free of the disease, she has a male sufferer, a male free of the disease, a female carrier, and a female free of the disease.

So the only difference is getting a daughter who suffers from the disease rather than a duaghter who is neither sufferer nor carrier. I don't think there were any female sufferers in the royal family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
63. No way!
Too many republican's as it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whitacre D_WI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
66. BTW, for the "think of the congenital diseases!" crowd:
We're not talking sibling procreation here, SGW is asking about cousin marriages. The offspring of first cousins do have an elevated risk of genetic problems, but not nearly so great as brother/sister couplings. A lot of these issues can be addressed via genetic testing and counseling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #66
67. What about adopted siblings with no blood relation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whitacre D_WI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. No, that's just wrong.
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
71. My mother's parents were first cousins
Back then it wasn't illegal for them to marry, but they had to get permission from the Bishop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
72. It depends ...
I think it should be allowed as long as there is no blood relationship.

I saw a program where a brother and sister were married, had children, and a happy life. Don't freak out. Either one or both of these children were adopted, and were not blood relatives. Turns out this is not an isolated case. If I remember correctly they may have mentioned that there are hundreds cases like this in the US.

The thing that stuck in my mind was that with their situation, their children only have a single set of Grandparents. This turned out to be a strange thing to explain to people.

Cheers
Drifter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armand Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
73. That's.....gross.
Edited on Wed Feb-25-04 01:36 PM by Armand
And wrong on an infinite number of levels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
75. I went to school with a guy who's parents were 1st cousins...
They'd of course never been married. He was actually normal. Turned out to be one of my best friends in high school. Just sadly, though, his family life was really screwed up. His mom and dad were still related of course, and his parent's married to other people. Can you imagine their family reunions?
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bif Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
77. Only south of the Mason-Dixon Line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
78. Anybody know, by the way, what the commonest birth defects resulting from
intermarriage are? You see this in places where people have lived in some isolation for several generations. One example I know of is northeastern Nebraska. A colleague & I nearly published a paper saying that heavy farm chemical use was causing increased birth defects in the area. Then we looked to see what was going on, and, ooops, it was close marriages. The birth defects were polydactyly and syndactyly - extra digits and webs between digits respectively. Minor problems that are usually corrected very early, often at birth, with a bit of surgery.

Korea, by the way, used to disallow marriages between people with the same last name. I don't think that's the case any more - they're not an isolated peninsula with a small population any longer. They still don't have very many last names, but there're tons of different clans for almost every last name. An exception being my wife's family, the Min family, who have only one clan, but that's an exception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MAlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
79. Alls I know
Is that whenever I bring any of my cousins around (I have 20), my friends want them-yes we're beautiful people (or my friends are just desperate)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
80. I once kissed my cousin
Long story, but I didn't know her that well, she stayed at my house for about two weeks when we were both 15, and we "fell in love". We ended up making out pretty passionately, but didn't go any further after my little sister caught us and told my dad (THAT was a fun conversation!)

In retrospect, I'm not particularly repulsed by what I did. We were both reasonably attractive, horny teenagers and it's not like she was my sister (ewwwww!). Genetically, the "cousin sex = birth defects" argument doesn't hold up, so I don't really see the problem with it.

I think it has to do with how close you were as kids. I have female cousins my age who I grew up playing with regularly, and the thought of having sex with, or marrying, them has ZERO appeal. This one cousin, who I'd never been close with (before or since), still rates a little differently in my book.

Similarly, when I was 16 my dad remarried and I found myself with a pair of attractive girls, 15 and 16 years old, sleeping in the room next to mine. Like most boys that age, I hit on them and actually ended up sleeping with one of them. At that time, I didn't have any concept of them as "sisters", and there was no blood relation, so I didn't see any problem with it. TODAY they ARE my sisters, and the thought of having sex with, or marrying, either of them repulses me. I DO consider them family today, which makes them romantically or sexually off-limits. Familiarity breeds family (no pun intended).

(Any divorcees with teenagers considering remarriage should keep this story in mind. My dad never ONCE discussed this with me, and the thought that it was somehow "wrong" just never entered the equation.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithlet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
81. I'm not against it.
I had a crush on my 1st cousin once removed (my father's cousin) who was closer to my age. He lived hundreds of miles away, though, so I rarely saw him. All of my 1st cousins are girls except for twin boys who are much younger than I, so marrying a 1st cousin would never be my choice, being heterosexual.

The only way I'd be against it is in the case of double cousins, because they're as genetically as close as siblings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
83. As one whose father's family tree is rather stumpy
I would have to say no, don't do it. Otherwise you could be risking your childrens' future. Granted, you could be passing on some positive, recessive traits(in my father's family all of us have exceptional constitutions, healthy as horses, rarely contract diseases). But you could also be passing on some rather negative, recessive traits also(my father's family has problems with alcoholism, Altzhimers, and manic deppression). I bless my mother every day for coming for a completly different gene pool.

If you do decide to go through with this, get some genetic counseling before having kids. But hey, I understand where you're coming from. When I was in my teens I had a huge crush on a first cousin of mine. Then I thought of my father's family and how they all look alike(both male and female), and that pretty much cooled my jets then and there.

And don't dispair, with all of the people in the world, there is at least one out there who is right for you. I gave up on finding somebody when I was about thirty two, went out and bought a house big enough for one, and then poof, four months later I met my future wife. And boy were we crowded in that house for ten years. Thankfully we've recently moved to a larger place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC