|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
LastKnight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:04 PM Original message |
is it just my imagination, or is this new amendment thier proposing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DuctapeFatwa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
1. it would also require amendment of the 1st and repeal of the 14th |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pagerbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
2. Has it even been written yet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LastKnight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. i heard on CNN that bush was backing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LastKnight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. yea... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurikanDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
4. But, it would be part of the Constitution, therefore not unconstitutional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LastKnight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:14 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. but can it even be added if it contradicts the constitution? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurikanDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:30 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. That's a circular argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LastKnight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:33 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. i see the point now that ive already made a fool of myself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurikanDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:39 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. I hope I didn't say anything to make you feel foolish. I wasn't thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:39 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Nah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frankly_fedup2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
5. Not since Bush/Cheney2004, Inc., came into power . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
6. an amendment to the constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LastKnight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:13 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. but if a proposed amendment is unconstitutial... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:16 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. you don't understand.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LastKnight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:20 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. yea ok... makes sense now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starroute (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 01:38 AM Response to Reply #14 |
29. Your post was no more half-baked than this silly amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TreasonousBastard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. It sure can... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoeBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:16 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Interesting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:19 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:45 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TreasonousBastard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
10. An amendment is by definition "unconstitutional." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WannaJumpMyScooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:26 PM Response to Original message |
16. No, you pretty much got it covered. What strikes me as odd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryYoungMan (856 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
22. You've all got this wrong! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:56 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. You are mistaken |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryYoungMan (856 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 12:10 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. "It was overturned because a later amendment repealed it"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 12:18 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. You claimed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 12:22 AM Response to Original message |
26. "Sacred and holy"? Try "Sacred and holy cow"! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noiretextatique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 01:04 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. right on! if they gave a damn about what the majority of people think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LastKnight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 01:06 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. that was exactly my point nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC