Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rock 'n' roll scandal!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
ForrestGump Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 11:15 PM
Original message
Rock 'n' roll scandal!!!

I've been sick, the last few days, and have found myself reduced to randomly toodling through youtube in search of entertainment. There's an increasing breadth of stuff available on that thing. I found something that kind of blew me away -- a clip of Elvis Presley live in Detroit (March 31, 1957 -- he wore the jacket from famous gold suit there for at least one of the two shows he did that day).

There're many reasons why many in the American mainstream vehemently hated and feared the kid from Tupelo back in the '50s, especially once he left the relative safety of acceptance and regional fame in venues around east Texas and the like (seems like Texans were the only people who accepted him, just about) and went national and then international. They hated his look; his long hair (by '50s standards) and his flashy clothes. They hated his moves, for damn sure...they hated the unleashed sexuality of it (well, at least, that's how THEY saw it) and there's no doubt that much of the repulsion was tied in with latent racism. On that subject, Elvis crossed (smashed through, actually) the color barrier in his personal life and in the sound of his music, and the influences on it, and THAT did not go over well even outside the still-segregated South.

As an aside, here's some '50s gentlemen's opinion of the evil influence of the 'jungle music' known as rock 'n' roll:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U17vvQC2lXE

It's possibly a bit hard to believe now, but they hated him back then. They weren't keen on rock 'n' roll, in general, but Elvis was the Public Enemy Number One to them, and not just because he was the leading proponent of this new musical mélange. To some, he was also a white boy from the South who betrayed his own race. It didn't matter that he was traditionally polite to his elders, had a passionate love for and interest in all forms of gospel music, and included in his record collection songs by Dean Martin, Mario Lanza, and even Caruso. He couldn't do anything right -- he even got lambasted for singing gospel when he first produced sacred recordings in 1957 ("blasphemy!") and his version of "White Christmas" that same year was widely banned (and characterized by the Christian Science Moinitor as a disgusting, "barnyard version" of the song) to the point that a DJ who locked himself in the studio and played it back-to-back was fired. I mean, come on...it's "White Christmas," for freak's sake. It's not like he said he was bigger than Jesus while biting the head off a flying animal. For that matter, when he was sent to patrol near the East German border, when in the Army, the communist propaganda rags printed claims that he was sent there by the US government to destabilize their country by warping the values of their East German youth. I find that one hard to top, myself.

A lot of it is the same old story -- the kind of "oh, these kids today!" thing that's afflicted everyone from the Beatles to Ozzy Osbourne and Marilyn Manson (and, yes, I don't have any time for Mr Manson's act but I fully appreciate his context and he's intelligently stated the valid parallels between the attacks on him and those on Elvis 50 years before) -- but there were also more case-specific reasons to hate Elvis, most notably the racial aspect and what looked like the antics of sex maniac. They'd never seen anything like him. And they were afraid. Think Pleasantville -- if you look at this 1956 appearances on TV (tame by today's standards, of course, albeit still riveting), and are lucky enough to get hold of a complete show that includes all the innocuous variety acts that were on the bill with him, you might begin to get a sense of how different he was, and perhaps even how much of a threat this unintentional rebel was to the '50s middle-class white American sensibility. Not everyone over 18 hated him, of course, but he sure was a shock.

What he received at the hands of the national press and in the tirades of local bigots was, in some ways, a larger-scale repeat of the kind of drubbing he'd received from certain quarters back home, most notably the beatings and attempted beatings he'd taken in Memphis, as a high school kid who did not look like the others at his school in crewcut 1953 Memphis and later on the road at the hands of jealous boyfriends and assorted beefy rednecks. I've seen a lot of these editorial remarks about Elvis, from all quarters of the country, and they were unbelievably vicious. Even Frank Sinatra chimed in, claiming that "His kind of music is deplorable, a rancid smelling aphrodisiac. It fosters almost totally negative and destructive reactions in young people." Frank changed his mind, three years later, after Elvis returned from the Army and he and his Rat Packers hosted a welcome-home television extravaganza that paid Elvis a fee so generous that it made the record books for years thereafter (he'd have been less charitable, I'm sure, if he knew what Elvis and Frank's then girlfriend, Juliet Prowse, were getting up to in their dressing rooms on the set of GI Blues). SImilarly, Ed Sullivan once said that he wouldn't let his daughter cross the street to see Elvis Presley but then he saw the ratings for Milton Berle's hugely controversial second airing of Elvis and the rest is history. It's the American way.

Anyway, here's the clip I mentioned...it's really quite mind boggling how insane the audiences were at the height of '50s Presleymania. It'd never been seen before, not like that. His audiences in '70s concerts were boisterous enough, at least on tour, but this is total madness and it's kind of scary and intimidating even to see and hear in its grainy, indistinct 1957 8-mm film glory:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTMX5myYKak

And, on the off-chance that you might want to actually hear the man, here's a clip from Tupelo's Mississippi-Alabama State Fair the year before...I'd seen much of the silent footage before but someone very carefully matched audio from that show and made rather a nice little time capsule that begins to hint at why Elvis became such an icon, and is still a hot topic even now. The most apparent thing, to me, is that Elvis is having a lot of fun here -- the thing not understood by people who criticize his later performances for his fooling around on certain songs is that Elvis never took himself (or his image) too seriously, from the start to the end, and I think that's (combined with the very contrasting traits of innate charisma and intensity as a performer, as well as a serious dedication to singing the inviolable songs dead straight with all the energy reserves available) still one of the most appealing things about him:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlHY4u8eskI


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arnold Judas Rimmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Elvis Presley's a great guy
a fine singer, and a Hell of a soldier as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soTsvoTYdbA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForrestGump Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. And he can sing while he fights, too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't blame parents for being afraid of rock and roll.

They had definite reason to be, as time has shown. It changed everything about our popular culture, led to the sexual revolution, and supported a lot of popular movements adults of the 1950s would have found shocking.

(Don't get me wrong, rock and roll is great, but it WAS very revolutionary and threatening to the status quo.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForrestGump Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Good point

Though the country needed shaking up, and that was the right moment in time for it.

Still, the law of unintended consequences and all that: Britney, Gene Simmons, etc. It wasn't all positive change. :D



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well...
"His kind of music is deplorable, a rancid smelling aphrodisiac. It fosters almost totally negative and destructive reactions in young people."

LOL, Frank. Sorry, Frank couldn't hold a candle to even Elvis singing "Do The Clam".

My aunt saw Elvis up here in Cleveland in Nov of 56 at the Arena. She said she went there with her friends to see some`of the other acts and they thought Elvis was great, but "weird".

I also had a buddy who's parent's were in Vegas when Elvis played there in 1956. I asked her about it and she said that they had no idea what he was doing, but they enjoyed it..lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForrestGump Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It must have been wild

I mean, to see him at any time, but to see him back in the '50s would be something beyond belief. I've met hundreds of people who all said basically the same thing about their experiences seeing Elvis in concert (mostly in the '70s), and that was that you could feel the charisma and electricity coming off him even if you were seated in the very back of the biggest coliseums he played. And a lot of those people were decidedly not fans when they went to the show, usually dragged along by someone who was, but to a person they'll testify that they were converted almost the moment he set foot on the stage.

And, to think, on top of all that there was the actual singing and the physical performance. I think it's true enough that he could have just stood on the stage and done nothing and they would have gone nuts, so when you add that to the man's performance abilities it's a pretty potent combination. Of course, that same thing (unconditional adulation from the audience) can be very detrimental and I think that, in Elvis' case, it ultimately was. It's the same main reason, really, why the Beatles stopped touring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForrestGump Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. P.S.: thought you might also enjoy this clip of a little-known aspect of Elvis' pioneering work,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. overrated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC