Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who here is a Fireman or Policeman or Security officer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Ashes Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 09:30 PM
Original message
Who here is a Fireman or Policeman or Security officer
of some kind, and feels strongly that the development of the Homeland Security Dept and other pre-interventions

Is Shit?

Sorry to be so blunt, but that's my opinion. The creation of depts and the lies told to those that work in public safety fields has been dispicable.

Anyone agree? Where am I wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Reitred from Federal Law Enforcement
and have lots of friends in still

and yes, it is despiciable, but lots of agencies are getting money and attention they have long felt due, so the rank and file keep quiet when given new toys.

the same thing happened during the war on some drugs, everyone knew it was hopeless and idiotic, but the federal dollars kept flowing, and no one wanted to stop that

when the money dries up, sometime next year or so, you will hear complaints, not before
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ashes Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. They may be getting more toys
but their ranks are shrinking like a penis in frozen water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Computer security
Maybe not exactly what you are looking for but much of where security issues are happening these days are on the net and much of it is invasive and a violation of privacy. Carnivore and other tools drift dangerously into unconstitutional areas. The munitions laws being applied to encryption techniques is a bit silly. Security is an illusion. Selling security a great business because you will never be absolutely safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ashes Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I do think about these things
this has me perplexed:

"The munitions laws being applied to encryption techniques is a bit silly."

Could you please elaborate? Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Encryption
Under US law, strong encryption algorithms are considered a non-exportable encryption. If you were to take source code to an encryption schema out of the country you woul dbe an illegal arms exporter and liable for prosecution (as far as treason). This is just plain stupid. As if only americans can come up with good encryption. and as if there is any way to prevent this. Back in the early days of PGP (Pretty Good Privacy, a public-private key encryption system based upon RSA's schema) people actually created a t-shirt with bar code source code on it and a caption "This shirt is a munition" and under the law that is wholly accurate. This law is a simple relic of another age and like many others that have been passed as a result of a mis-understanding of the internet is something that badly needs re-visiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ashes Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'll be damned
that is something entirely new to me. Thanks for the info. interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. That is because when Congress searched for an applicable
federal law to cover the export of encrption software, the only thing remotely like it was military grade stuff, which, under international law is munitions.
they could not convience any federal agency to take lead on making regulations on internet or software, so they did what they could, based on the "experts" they had from NSA, CIA and Defense.

It seems silly now, but given the lack of understanding the Congress had at the time of computers (at the time they had no networked computers) and software, and considering they have pretty much given up on enforcing the law (because there is still no clear lead agency on internet/software even now) it is a moot point that trivia buffs like to bring up now and again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Not a moot point
The government has shown a willingness to enforce this law. This law is as screwed up as the DMCA. Encryption needs constant review and challenge. This is a matter of national security that is sorely misunderstood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. You cannot export encryption codes
larger than 128k to foreign countries as they are classified as munitions. The idea is that anything larger than 128k is nearly uncrackable. The US does not want foreign nations to have access to such technology. PGP code is a freely distributed encryption system that meets this qualification. The creator of this system originally distributed the software to create this system to any that wished to DL it. A legal battle erupted due to the munitions laws and he was forced to desist distribution to any foreign nation.

When you DL programs like Netscape you have to decide which security version you are going to use becuase of this munitions law. The heavy encryption version is blocked to nonUS sites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I used to sell security software
and can tell you that you are right: no solution is infallible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Character Assassin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. Former LEO, now considering becoming paramedic/firefighter
I feel they're shit even though I'm not one anymore. Doesn't take a cop to know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. Former Security Officer
Edited on Wed Jul-09-03 10:55 AM by Loonman
Now security consultant and analyst.


I can tell you that not much has changed in the private securtiy industry since 9/11. All the same policies are in place, but with more emphasis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC