Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oh crap!! GREASE is on TV

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-04 10:57 AM
Original message
Oh crap!! GREASE is on TV
Something called the "Love Stories" channel.

How does she FIND these damned movies and channels? I didn't even know we got that channel or that it existed.

Yesterday during Saturday morning "quiet time" is was a memorable Natasha Kinski-Timothy Dalton work entitled "Time Share"








:shrug: :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-04 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. In Grease... Why Is The "Coca Cola" Logo Pixeled-Out?
Edited on Sun Feb-15-04 11:10 AM by arwalden
When Danny and Sandy are in the malt shop, there's a Coca-Cola logo on the wall and a Coca-Cola cooler that have the logo's digitally blurred. WHY?

It's poorly done and annoying as hell!

The original movie didn't do that, did it? Why would Coca-Cola care? Or was it that Paramount decided to 'punish' Coca-Cola for not continuing to pay a fee for product placement? (I don't even know if there was such an agreement in the first place. Perhaps Paramount was trying to blackmail Coca-Cola into paying a fee after the fact.)

Or was it something to do with the Sony/Coca-Cola partnership?

-- Allen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-04 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Answered My Own Question
http://www.dvdtalk.com/dvdsavant/s70grease.html

This was discussed in '78 when Grease came out, and you basically hit on the correct answer yourself. It was before 'product placement' was big biz - now there are special people at every studio and many independent producers whose job it is to get 'consideration' for the use of products and logos in films.

<SNIP>

But back to Grease. Savant read at the time that the producers filmed the Malt Shop scenes with the Coke signs prominent and only later did studio lawyers ask if clearances had been obtained. Uh, no, why? This meant that Coca-Cola had to be consulted, and with the scenes already in the can, The Pause That Refreshes was in a unique bargaining position. Their decision to say no was made on grounds of taste, not cash. After seeing the raunchy content of Grease they declined to allow the display of their logos in such a trashy film. This same problem griped 1941 when the Crackerjack people didn't want their candy-coated popcorn product used after reading the script. That's what made writer Bob Gale invent 'Popper Jacks'. Same goes for the 'Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man' in Ghostbusters, Savant surmises. Obviously the Pillsbury Doughboy didn't want to be R-Rated. Crackerjacks probably never regretted their choice to say no to 1941, but Reese's pieces clearly chose right when they said yes to E.T. The Extraterrestrial three years later. In the media storm around E.T., Reese's gained a market foothold impossible to buy at any price.

So what were the producers of Grease to do? Apparently bringing the stars back and reshooting the scenes was economically out of the question, so the only other choice was to bring in the special effects people to obliterate the Coke signs with those funky grey rectangles.


<SNIP>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC