Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question: Why don't Brits use the letter Z?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 09:32 AM
Original message
Question: Why don't Brits use the letter Z?
I've been reading a book published in the UK and they refuse to use the letter Z unless the word starts with it. It's really annoying, and I was just wondering if anyone knew why.
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Because they speak a language called ENGLISH. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. BTW...
It's pronounced "Zed" in the UK, and supposedly in Canada too. Why?

Heh heh heh... because that's how the FRENCH pronounce it. Take a big one, Chimpy!

}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tripper11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Not supposedly...definately...
and living in Seattle now, I still say it. I'm trying to spread the good word of the proper pronunciation of the letter "Z"

Zed Zed Zed....:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOteric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. Did you mean
to use the word 'definitely,' or perhaps the word 'defiantly?'

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. They may *speak* English,
but they write it in French
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Well,
English is a Germanic language and in German, the letter Z is pronounced "Tsett". My guess is that it's a holdover from both Old English and German.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gator_in_Ontario Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. yeah
they got that "re" thing going too. Theatre, centre. Everyone knows the "e" sound comes before the "r" sound. We need to learn 'em Murkin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think I've got your answer
You've been looking for "zee" and you should be looking for "zed"..hahaha :)
P.S....We use zed in Canada too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. She's right
As well in Canada (And I believe in Britain as well we use "Z" when Americans would us "S" for example. Recognize. I'm not sure if Americans use the 's' 100 per cent. It's just something I've noticed on DU which lead me to believe so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lithos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'll tell that to the Devizes town council
That they can't use adzes or use the colour azure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. No...They tend to spell Amaze Amase and Amazing Amasing...
Do you see where I'm going with this?
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devils Advocate NZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Actually, you're wrong on those two words...
We speakers (and writers) or the King's English do in fact spell "amaze" and "amazing" with "z", although we probably shouldn't as its etymology is the Middle English word "amasen" which is itself derived from the Old English "amasian" (or so www.merriam-webster.com says :) )

However, the word "critize" is an example of the use of a "z" in America, where the rest of the English speaking world spells it "criticise".

You see, we speakers of PROPER English, we understand that many words are not spelled the way they sound. However, this seemed to confuse Americans and thus "ise" was changed to "ize" to make it easier for Americans to remember how to spell such words. :)

I am still trying to understand, though, why Americans dropped the second "i" from "aluminium"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. Why Don't We Ask A Canadian Reporter
Like Hey Hey to explain British Zees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. Because way back in the day,
after the founding of our country (or perhaps slightly before), the people of the colonies/USA decided to change spellings of words to distance themselves from the British. Thus, the loss of "u" in words like colour, neighbour, and the use of "z" instead of "s", as you raised, and the switching of "re" into "er" in centre, theatre, etc.

So the British do it "correctly", and we (US of America) are the ones who changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. not quite
actually that is not exactly correct

the "re" is that way because we decided that it was more correct to use "er" because when the word is pluralized you don't have to change it, just add an "s"

the "ou" in British english is a result of the French influence...american english evolved out away from that, hence that change

now the "Z" you may be correct on

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Still not quite ...
> the "re" is that way because we decided that it was more correct to
> use "er" because when the word is pluralized you don't have to
> change it, just add an "s"

As in "theater" going to "theaters" instead of "theatre" going
to "theatres", "center" becoming "centers" instead of "centre"
becoming "centres", ... sorry, what was your point again? :-)

Personally, I suspect that a Founding Father had this flash of
precognition wherein he saw the 43rd president and tried to dumb-down
the American language ready for him. Unfortunately, some of the
more traditional writers over-ruled the original (purely phonetic)
version. As a result, instead of having a language that would serve
to camouflage the grunting of inane chimps ("laidis an gennelmen, der
prezident ov der yewnited stayts") there is still too much in common
between American and English. Consequently, we can recognise comments
like "nukular terrists" as demonstrating the stupidity & ignorance of
the speaker - to the embarrassment of all the good citizens of the US.

Never mind oh prescient Founding Father: you had a good try!

Nihil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
13. Samuel Johnson inadvertently misplaced it when he wrote his dictionary.
It was later found lying uselessly about at Hadrian's Wall.

(English major humor)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
15. So, to quote Wayne from "Wayne's World" -
Do they refer to ZZ Top as "Zed Zed Top"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
17. it's good that they start with it
Or my name would be SombyWoof in the UK. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
19. Because They Are In Short Supply...
They have an abundance of "S's" but very vew Z's.

Many of the Z's are being used in comic strips to indicate snoring or sleeping sounds.

Zzzzzzzzz,
Allen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Yep, supply & demand ...
... which is why they cost more in Scrabble!

Hmmm, is there a different version of Scrabble for the US market
than for the UK? There is only one "Z" in the UK edition (worth 10
points) and lots of "S"s (worth 1 point each). Surely this is unfair
for Americans (who normally spell words with more Zs than Brits)?

Yours interestedly,

Confused of Hampshire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Zame in the US Edition of "Scrabble". (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I'm Just Happy That They Don't Have To Avoid Lightening Saps
and that they can see Sebras at the Soo.

-- Allen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Doesn't "Lightening Saps" belong to the Atkins thread?
Zo, you think the Britizh way of zpelling thingz iz funny eh?
At leazt the American zpellingz feel more laid back, zofter zoundz
and zuch like ...
:hi:

Nihil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
22. Insh'Allah... n/t
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. According to my Merriam-Webster Dictionary of English Usage,
Edited on Tue Feb-10-04 11:03 PM by Art_from_Ark
the differences between British and American spellings stem largely from what the lexicographers of the day considered to be the dominant spellings of their respective nations. Samuel Johnson, Britain's influential lexicographer of the 1700s, favored the French or French-based spellings like the final -our and -re (as well as the pronunciation of "s" as a "z" when it is between two vowels), perhaps in deference to what was then the world's lingua franca and Britain's proximity to and influence from France.

Noah Webster, some 70 years later, concluded that in American usage, the dominant spelllings of some words had become more phonetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RogueTrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
27. Because Z is a butt ugly letter
S <- comly letter
Z <- S's ugly sibling.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trigz Donating Member (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
28. Because they speak proper Blighty (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC