Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

somebody give me something

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 06:40 PM
Original message
somebody give me something
to research.

I don't really care what it is. The more obscure the better - just please, a "real" something I might could eventually find - not a non-existent something.

I think I'm about to lose my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. How many angels can dance on a pin?
It's said that people used to debate this as a theological question. After finding the answer, maybe you can tell us how they ever got into a ridiculous discussion.
With Christmas so near, I guess I've got religion on the brain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. seemingly it was a needle,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
48. and in a related story
Edited on Mon Dec-24-07 06:06 PM by mzteris
Bible put on a pinhead-size chip

Researchers in Israel say they have succeeded in putting a version of the Bible on a chip smaller than a pinhead. Its 300,000 words in Hebrew were inscribed on a silicon surface at the Haifa Institute of Technology.

. . .snip.. . .

The record for the smallest copy is held by a Bible measuring 2.8x3.4x1cm (1.1x1.3x0.4in), weighing 11.75g (0.4 ounces) and containing 1,514 pages.

The 0.5sq-mm (0.01sq-in) nano-Bible was written on a silicon surface covered with a thin layer of gold (20nanometres thick - 0.0002mm).

-more-

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7158792.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lost-in-nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. how many miles
it is from the north pole to Wayne, NJ???

need to know.....

:)

THANKS

lost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. as a crow flies -
it looks to be about - 3,026.04 miles.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Depends if there's the usual flooding in Wayne, or not...
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here's a good one!
Years ago, I read an article about the rate of pre-marital sex in Puritan colonies. Evidently, an examination of birth and wedding records showed an astonishingly high rate of non-marital coitus. I've never been able to find the original article I read.

So... have at it: What percentage of puritan pregnancies began outside of wedlock?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. percentages vary - but 1/3 looks about average.
******
"In towns such as Hingham and Watertown, the proportion of new brides who were already pregnant climbed from 10 percent in 1680 to 40 percent by 1730." Daniel Scott Smith and Michael S. Hindus, “Premarital Pregnancy in America 1640-1971: An Overview and Interpretation,” The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 5 (1975):

******
In the 17th century nearly 50% of all brides went to the alter pregnant. "Made in America" by Bill Bryson.

****
In a study of records in seventeenth-century Somerset County, “more than a third of the immigrant women whose marriages were recorded were pregnant by the time of the ceremony. Such a high rate of bridal pregnancy – two to three times that of many contemporary English parishes – is testimony to the extend of social disruption. There is little evidence that the community objected to this kind of sexual freedom; no presentments for bridal pregnancy appear in any of the Maryland courts."


“. . . one out of five Maryland-born brides was pregnant when she married. Lack of parental control was a contributing element. Orphaned girls were apparently particularly vulnerable to premarital conceptions; initial study indicates an even greater frequency of bridal pregnancy among women whose fathers had died during their minority." http://www.pobronson.com/factbook/pages/428.html


*****
". . . men and women flirted at singing schools, drank and danced in alehouses, devoured romantic novels, and engaged in a good deal of premarital sex. . ." Puritans at Play: Leisure and Recreation in Colonial New England, by Bruce C. Daniels. New York, St. Martin's Press, 1995.


****
". . . scholars say New England's first colonists weren't really anti-sex. They recognized the sex act as not only essential for procreation but an earthly delight. They just wanted it confined to marriage.

The confinement wasn't always successful. As historian Edmund S. Morgan writes, in spite of the harsh penalties for sexual sins, "the impression one gets from reading the court records of 17th century is that illicit sexual intercourse was fairly common." . . . http://www.nd.edu/~ndmag/permw98.htm



*****

". . .In eighteenth-century New England, premarital sex and pregnancy surged. Previous historical interpretations generally followed the trope first advanced by evangelical critics during the religious revivals of the 1740s: that New England had declined from Puritan piety to wallow in immorality. More sensibly, Godbeer depicts a triumph of moral pragmatism over the impossible purity of the initial Puritan agenda. Unable to prevent young people from engaging in premarital sex, rural parents sensibly sought some influence and information by encouraging the practice of "bundling." Instead of seeking sex in barns or byways, young people slept together, "bundled" in the paternal home. Although ostensibly clothed and limited to fondling, the bundlers produced the surge in premarital pregnancy.

Some ministers fulminated against the practice, but in vain and to the detriment of their influence and careers. Parents defended bundling because it revealed whom their daughters slept with, so that in the event of pregnancy they could bring effective pressure for marriage or a financial settlement. "In order to ensure that unwed fathers were held accountable," Godbeer explains, "it was essential that people other than the lovers themselves know that they had been involved with each other." A growing number of young women got only a settlement for their out-of-wedlock baby, but they suffered surprisingly little damage to their reputations. Most of these young women quickly found another reputable man to marry them. Godbeer describes the new rules of the game "as a pragmatic accommodation between the greater sexual freedom that young people now enjoyed and the desire of parents to maintain protective surveillance over their children."
Sexual Revolution in Early America by Richard Godbeer Martyrs to Venus A Review by Alan Taylor
http://www.powells.com/review/2002_10_31.html


". . . Between 1640 and 1685, over 150 couples in Essex County alone were convicted of premarital sex, while those who secretly preformed said act without producing offspring remained under the radar of the Puritan church members . . ." Godbeer, Richard. Sexual Revolution in Early America. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2002 pg. 34 http://books.google.com/books?id=Tngxrcg-kqEC&pg=PA34&lpg=PA34&dq=puritans+%22premarital+sex%22&source=web&ots=fp9eIC3y1a&sig=TI9PNBJLcAiiMCzix-9zzCrC92g#PPP1,M1

****

Thanks. That was fun and informative!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is the chow-chow really the oldest dog known to mankind, going back to the Ming dynasty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Reputedly the Han dynasty -
about 1100 years before the Ming.


Description: Arguments prevail as to whether the Chow Chow is one of the truly original dog breeds or whether it is a descendent of the Tibetan Mastiff. What is known, is that this breed with the unique blue-black tongue, has existed in China since 150 BC. Many of the Chows were used as guarding, hunting or carting dogs, although the few that were born with the smoky blue color were often elevated to the role of Buddhist temple dog. At one time, this breed was also raised as a food supply for Chinese tables, hence the name "chow" which is Cantonese for "food." http://www.kennel.com/chowchow/index.html

****
Bonus:

The "ancient" group includes 14 geographically diverse breeds that are not usually grouped together, including the Asian chow chow, Shar-Pei, Shih Tzu, Pekingese, Tibetan terrier, Akita and Shiba Inu; the African basenji; the Middle Eastern Saluki; and the Siberian husky and Alaskan malamute.

The group's geographic and physical diversity surprised a number of geneticists not involved in the study and even the researchers themselves.

Dr. Kruglyak speculated that these breeds were directly descended from the first dogs and then spread out with their nomadic owners.

When and where dogs first separated from wolves is hotly disputed, with time estimates based on mitochondrial DNA evidence ranging from 15,000 to 135,000 years ago.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/21/science/21dog.html?ex=1400472000&en=6b49c839cde80d81&ei=5007&partner=USERLAND
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Wow - thanks so much. That was really interesting, and fast, too! How much
do I owe ya?:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. da nada.
It was my pleasure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. what are the names of every person
currently working in the Bush administration who were also involved in Iran-Contra and what jobs do they have now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. every person? who knows?
Elliott Abrams: Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Advisor for Global Democracy Strategy

Ambassador John D. Negroponte: Director of National Intelligence

Robert Michael Gates: Secretary of Defense

Charles Allen: Under Secretary for the Department’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis

David S. Addington: Chief of Staff for Cheney


and, of course: Dick Cheney.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ptah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. When did this magnificent machine succumb to internal combustion gadgets?


:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. starting around 1934 . . .
the diesel started making inroads. By the mid 40's/50's - steam was essentially - er - out of steam.



1913: The first commercially successful internal combustion engine locomotive in the U.S. was built by General Electric for the Dan Patch Line in Minnesota. Locomotive #100 had two Model GM16 gasoline-electric 8" x 10" V8's rated at 175 HP @ 550 rpm each. It weighed 57 tons and rode on two four-wheel trucks (B-B).

1915: The Santa Fe Depot is dedicated in San Diego on March 7th.

1917: The first Diesel-electric locomotive in the U.S. was a prototype built by G.E. Number 4 had one model GM50 air injection two-stroke V8 rated at 225 HP @ 550 rpm powering one of two trucks. http://www.sdrm.org/history/timeline/


American Railroads by John F. Stover (particularly pp 212-214-ish)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ptah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Why was Edgar Bergen there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. maybe that was his?
Mr. Bergen is the proud owner of a J. I. Case steam traction engine and his name appears on the membership roster of the Western Steam Fiends Association which confirms him as an ardent steam fan.
http://www.steamtraction.com/archive/149/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ptah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. He came to my small town in 1962 to watch a local farmer that still used steam.
We got his autograph.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. you have the most interesting
pictures!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kedrys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. Is it possible to hypnotize someone over the 'net?
A friend of mine has been going on and on about this chat room where the operators run "trances". I think it's bull. What say you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. certainly are people claiming to!
Internet hypnosis service launched
http://www.abc.net.au/pm/stories/s309770.htm

NetHypnosis: Hypno-psychotherapy Over the Internet. http://hypnosis.org/nethypnosis.htm

Hypnosis - Chat Rooms on IRC - irc.netsplit.deHypnosis Chat: Search for 'Hypnosis' within the Internet Relay Chat! ... irc.netsplit.de/chat/hypnosis.php

Chat Room Schedule
Hypnosis is a method of communication that induces a trance or trance-like state. .... Press HERE to CHAT. Press HERE to return to Dr. Blansett's Home Page ... www.serve.com/Blansett/SmokingForms/INTAKEPACKET.HTM - 15k -





Try it yourself and see: http://www.rabailkal.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kedrys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. In-teresting...!
Thanks for looking it up for me - lots of good reading there!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. What was the sister ship of the "Edmund Fitzgerald"?
... the steamship that shipwrecked on Lake Superior in November of 1975? Bonus points if you can find a picture of it (yes, they do exist out there on the series of tubes)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. here ya go!
S.S. ARTHUR B HOMER

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. Was Poe a genius or simply a drugged-out madman?
...Something in keeping with that losing your mind issue... :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. both.
A Genius who was self-medicating his mental health issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPKrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. how far is timbuktu from
Ft. Smith Arkansas

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. 2,102 mi
of course that's Timbuktu, Oregon.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPKrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. nyaaaaat!!!
wrong Timbuktu!

but

okay

thanks

:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. 1,392?
Timbuktu, Twenty-nine Palms, CA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. okay okay
6,923.28 miles (more or less)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPKrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #33
41. that's better
;)

:hug:

:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. anything to make you happy,
hon!

:loveya: :hug: :loveya: :hug: :loveya: :hug: :loveya: :hug: :loveya: :hug: :loveya: :hug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPKrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. anything?
:evilgrin:

:think:

:hug: :hug: :hug:

:loveya:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Welllllllllllllllllll .........


it IS Christmas and all . . .









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. Gin & Juice. I had some guy telling me the other night that
it was Gin & tonic.:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. uh - no -
Gin & Juice:
Gin 2 oz.
Grapefruit Juice 2 oz.
Orange Juice 3 oz.
Lime 1 slice

Gin & Tonic:
2 oz gin
5 oz tonic water
1 lime wedge



Bonus: "Gin and Juice" is a 1993 single by rapper Snoop Doggy Dogg, from his debut solo album Doggystyle. Also done by Dr. Dre and a NYC hip-hop artist named Phish, and has been covered by a bluegrass band from Texas called the Gourds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
28. Why did Wisconsin abandon the common-law rule against perpetuities?
And is there any good way to craft an estate plan so one's grandchildren may benefit, when one's children haven't even been conceived yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. hmmmmm -
The common law rule served a valuable social objective. Indeed, in Tennessee, perpetuities are banned by the state Constitution.3 Nevertheless, the rule often did work badly. If A violated the rule, it was not A who suffered; rather an interest clearly intended for B would often go to C instead. The need for reform was evident.


Only eight states, plus the District of Columbia, still maintain the common law rule, unadorned by modern modifications.


. . . in the other 12 states, which have either repealed the rule entirely or allowed a trustor to "opt out" of the rule.5 Most of those states are open about their motive: to promote trust business. In other words, repeal is not generally enacted for reasons of policy, since USRAP adequately addresses the historic shortcomings of the rule. Rather, commerce has trumped policy, much to the chagrin of those who still believe the rule serves a vital purpose.


Specifically:

The common law rule against perpetuities is not in force in Wisconsin. Rather, Wis. Stat. § 700.16(1)(a) states: "A future interest or trust is void if it suspends the power of alienation for longer than the permissible period. The permissible period is a life or lives in being plus a period of 30 years." "The power of alienation is suspended when there are no persons in being who, alone or in combination with others, can convey an absolute fee in possession of land …." Wis. Stat. § 700.16(2).
****

Wisconsin does not recognize the common law rule against perpetuities: The rule against perpetuities is an English law principle that has been carried over to the United States. It requires a person's interest in property to vest (or become absolute) within a certain period, typically within a life or lives in being plus 21 years. When the rule applies, restrictions placed on the transfer of property beyond that period will be invalid.

The rule against perpetuities can be an obstacle in estate planning in connection with trusts that are intended to continue for many generations. These trusts (sometimes called "Dynasty Trusts") will not be effective in states that still follow the old English law rule. Wisconsin is one of only a few states that does not recognize the rule against perpetuities in its common law form. Instead, Wisconsin statutes provide for a rule against suspending a power of alienation that voids a future interest or trust if it suspends the power of alienation for longer than the "permissible period," which is set by statute as a life or lives in being plus 30 years.2 The statute also provides that a violation of the rule is avoided for trusts if the trustee has the power to sell trust assets, or there is an unlimited power to terminate the trust in one or more persons in being. Therefore, a trust established in Wisconsin can continue indefinitely as long as the grantor grants the trustee the power to sell trust assets.


*****
then there's this:

Common Law Rule Against Perpetuities – No interest is good unless is must vest, if at all, no later than 21 years after the death of some life in being at the creation of the interest.


We must prove that the interest will necessarily vest or necessarily fail to vest within the required period.
The Period begins at the creation of the interest and extends 21 years past the death of any persons who were alive at creation and who can affect the vesting of the interest.
If the interest necessarily vests or necessarily fails to vest within this period, it’s valid.


*****

As to your other question - I'm not lawyer so I don't think I can really comment.

Though I did find this info:

Beneficiary –
Identification of Beneficiaries – it’s alright to name unborn children as beneficiaries because they are ascertainable, but other beneficiaries, such as “my friends” are unascertainable.
Person or a Charity – most trusts must benefit a person or a charity (unless it’s an Honorary Trust, in which case it can be paid to certain categories, such as maintenance of a grave or a pet, etc).

§851.13 – Issue
Children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren, etc.

http://wisconsinsba.org/outlines/tne/TNEstatesErlanger-Ross.doc.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lil Missy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
36. Here's a serious one.
Why is the Black population disproportionately penalized in the legal system as opposed to Caucasians? Even the death penalty is unevenly applied to Blacks. That seriously disturbs me, when there is a lot more White crime than Black crime.

Let me tell you a story. A couple days ago I got into a serious scrape and injured myself fall on the ice, and it was so slippery that I couldn't get up. A Good Samaritan came along and helped me, but even he fell on his ass slipping in the ice.

I was convinced he was needed to crawl to the snow pack to get some traction to get up. I seriously in a desperate state when I fell and couldn't get up without his help.

I have told this story several times, and I am so grateful for his help.

So, why does this story take on a different tone if I mention that the Good Samaritan was Black?? Why does that make a difference? That pisses me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. because the US is
a "white supremacist patriarchal capitalist" society.

It was founded on racism and runs on racism. It's called "institutionalized racism".


Wanna hear another story to piss you off?


My youngest son is black and adopted while we were living in North Carolina. People would give me the "look" when they saw my baby, shunning, cold shoulder, mutters, etc - but if I told them he was a foster (or later adopted) - then suddenly I was "God's own helper" and "Blessed" for giving that "poor child a home".

Pardon me while I :puke:

No, I'm "blessed" because he's a wonderful loving awesome little boy!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lil Missy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #37
43. Well bless your heart. And I agree.
And I don't mean that in a condescending way either.

And BTW, I am partial to little boys! Just a fickle (and I don't give a shit if they are purple) and perhaps anal retentive thing with me.

:hi:

Well, maybe that was not a good research question for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuskerDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
38. Was Johnny Thunders murdered? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. officially, no -
listed as a drug overdose.

Some think, however, he was poisoned via his drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuskerDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Yup
Who knows? He lasted 10 years longer than Westerberg figured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
42. What are the functions of the beta receptors in a cell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. Beta receptors
Edited on Mon Dec-24-07 11:00 AM by mzteris
mediate relaxation or decreased activity of the effector cells. Thus, blood vessels dilate and uterine smooth muscle relaxes in response to activation of beta receptors. . ."

:hi:

Thanks for playing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC