Review: Amazon reader needs more juice
By PETER SVENSSON, AP Technology Writer
Wed Nov 21, 1:27 PM ET
NEW YORK - Making a successful reader for electronic books is one of the toughest tasks in consumer electronics. Many have tried and all have failed, defeated by something that's thousands of years old — the book.
This week, Amazon.com Inc. released the Kindle, the best attempt yet at toppling the book. It's in some ways an amazing device, but it's severely undercut by its poor battery life, making it hard to see it as a game-changer.
==
The Kindle, by contrast, lasted only 24 hours for me, including about 2 hours of reading, before needing a recharge. Amazon said that result was not typical, and that the device should be able to go two days between charges.
But that's still not good, and I think something's really gone wrong here. Combining a big battery, a display that takes practically no power and a cell phone that doesn't make calls shouldn't result in a device that has less than half the battery life of a cell phone.
==
But I'm willing to overlook some of those weird design choices, because the Kindle has some really cool features. For instance, the full-alphabet keyboard below the screen allows you to (slowly) type in words to search for in your books. You can annotate what you read. You can wirelessly send questions to a team of editors, who will grab answers for you from the Web and send them back to you for free. There's even a rudimentary Web browser that allows you to surf for free.
==
The real reason I can't recommend the Kindle is the battery issue. It's quite possible that Amazon could apply some simple fix, like a software upgrade, because the battery life is much shorter than its components seem to warrant.
more -
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071121/ap_on_hi_te/tech_test_amazon_kindle;_ylt=AjxvP.mjhk2x3vkmLXsBR5ys0NUE