Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sports rules you hate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
ohiosmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 12:45 PM
Original message
Sports rules you hate?
Football: Quarterback spiking the ball or taking a knee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. the DH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohiosmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. you and me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. the DH is blasphemy, and i'm not even a baseball fan,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phillycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
62. Looove the DH.
For obvious reasons. :D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #62
64. ahhh, the posterboy for the Never Going to Cooperstown club
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSdemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
92. I agree 100%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. The holding penalty in football.
x(

How many good drives are killed by that penalty! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
45. As a former Offensive Lineman, I thank you
If we got rid of holding, teams would score at least 100 points a game.....all you have to do is tackle your assigned guy, and that's pretty easy, especially when they're trying to find the ball carrier to tackle him.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 12:49 PM
Original message
Not being allowed to use guns or flamethrowers during the 7th inning stretch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. Just ban the 7th inning stretch altogether. I hate listening to some
moran who can't sing, try and sing a stupid song.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fox Mulder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Pass Interference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggies_boy Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
82. For Sure!
Let em play! No blood, no foul!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. taking a knee I can understand
you *have* to run a play, but just need to run out the clock and not move the ball.

but spiking? I thought the intentional grounding rule was supposed to get rid of that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. I think the idea is that
throwing the ball specifically to avoid a sack is intentional grounding. Spiking it to stop the clock is okay.

At least that's the theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. The rule that allows them to pre-empt other TV shows. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_Carcetti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. Infield fly rule!
That and what does and does not constitute a balk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. balks piss me off...either call them consistently or do away with them entirely
since no umpires actually seem to know what the hell a balk is (or is not), i say do away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
51. They know what it is
You don't graduate from umpiring school without knowing the rules.

Thing is, there are pitchers known for sneaky pick-off moves, and there are umps who let them get away with it and others who don't. Then you'd get a guy like Luis Tiant, who seemed to balk on every pitch. Some umps would be like, "I don't know what the hell he's doing out there" and let it go, while others figured, "There's gotta be a balk in that move" and call it on general principle.

A whole lot of what goes on between umpires and players/managers is personal. Maybe it shouldn't be, but it is, and always has been.

If baseball got rid of the balk, it'd be like rush hour on Teflon anytime a runner was on first.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HERVEPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Infield fly rule is required to prevent double plays by
fielder dropping the ball on purpose. It would be a farce without it.
It's only in effect when that can happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. yep
it's a good rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
77. I love the Infield Fly Rule.
I hate the rule that states that the batter is out if they lay down a bunt and on their way to first accidentally step on home plate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. Not being able to run with the bat.
The second baseman would never turn the double play without losing a bodypart in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. broadcasting them during primetime cartoon slots.
come on. There are how many sports channels?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Got that right! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. Quarterback taking a We Knee
:shrug: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. 12 round boxing matches
go back to 15...make them work for their money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HERVEPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Has it changed? Aren't championship matches still 15? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. no, it is unsafe for the fighters. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HERVEPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. Still remember watching the fight 45 years ago where Emile Griffith
killed Benny "Kid" Paret.

Norman Mailer's account of it below.
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_1-5-2004_pg3_6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohiosmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. Did you see the ESPN special. It discussed all that led up to the fight including
Paret calling Emile a maricon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HERVEPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #41
88. No, but read about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. it's been 12 since Ray Mancini killed that guy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohiosmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. 25 years ago today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. was it really? that's friggin' eerie, man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohiosmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:00 PM
Original message
Yep. Big article in the Review Journal about it. Here:
Edited on Tue Nov-13-07 02:00 PM by ohiosmith
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
35. The fight
was featured Sunday Morning on ESPN's Outside the Lines. Godawful fight (and I mean that in a good way.) Those two guys beat the hell out of one another but Boom Boom was just too strong in those latter rounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohiosmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. I missed the ESPN broadcast. I watched the fight live on TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. i have a vague memory of seeing it on tv
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohiosmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. It was brutal man. Mancini never really recovered. It was like he always held back just a little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #40
55. Same thing happen to Emile Griffin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohiosmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #39
95. You must've been in diapers. Youngster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
96. Yet after 75+ years of MMA....
only one documented death.
1000+ deaths due to boxing since 1900.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Godhumor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #96
102. A lot of MMA fighters say its due to the different gloves
MMA gloves are pretty much designed to only prevent fingers from breaking while boxing gloves provide more in the way of padding. Rather ocunterintuitively, MMA fighters say that not having the extra padding means they get knocked a lot quicker and after much fewer punches than boxers, who can absorb a tremendous amount of blows to the head due to the thicker gloves.

I'm pretty meh on this Saturday's UFC show, but the 12/29 card looks incredibly stacked. Should be a fun night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #102
116. Exactly
The heavily padded gloves in boxing are designed to prolong the fight. And sadly, it increases the brain trauma. The paying public wants to be entertained for at least an hour.

Your typical MMA is either finished very quickly or it devolves into a couple a jiu jitsu technicians trying to find a submission hold, which is where I find the most interesting aspect of the sport.

I think that jiu jitsu borders on art.

I remember a 180 pound Royce Gracie fighting a 260 pound Dan Severin for 16 minutes while lying on his back before eventually choking Severin with his legs!

Pure artistry!

I have a couple of belts in karate (i.e. not a black belt) but I would suggest that anyone interested in self defense study jiu jitsu. Karate was great in teaching me to parry strikes while not getting freaked out but all fights end on the ground.

That said. If you are really interested in self defense (sans firearm), study the moves banned by the UFC and other MMA.

Self defense or the defense of your loved ones is obviously not a game or a competition.

So all of the below is fair game:
head-butting
eye gouging
biting
fish hooking
attacks to the groin
small joint manipulation

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LNM Donating Member (538 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #20
68. That was awful!
I saw that fight on TV. Never watched boxing again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. Playing hockey on ice.
:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
22. NFL overtime.
Absolutely wtetched. Use the college rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #22
33. Just go to a field goal shootout
for one point per shot.
teams take turns kicking field goals, moving the ball 5 yards back every round. First team to miss loses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #33
46. That's an interesting twist.
Since field goals usually decide OT anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
javadu Donating Member (291 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #22
100. Add My Vote n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
24. Free agency and the salary cap in the NFL
Free agency and the salary cap in the NFL. Although probably good for the players, marketers and owners, the games and the rivalries of today simply don't have the excitement of the past (to me, at least..).

Blech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
25. That a half-educated jackass millionaire ball-handler gets more media attention
in one week than all the Pulitzer, Nobel, and Macarthur Genius Grant winners will get in a lifetime.

And that the average American could pull hundreds of irrelevant sports-based factoids out of their heads in a few minutes but can't find other countries on a map, say who their government representatives are, or list 10 classical composers, even if given an hour and web access.

And that the average school will cut music and arts education if its required to save the precious, worshipful sports programs, especially football. If it's a choice between fixing the anti-fire sprinkler system and inspecting the fire extinguishers, or getting new shoulder pads for the football team, the football team gets new shoulder pads and the drama guild and orchestra will be asked to do the fundraising for the capital improvement, because the football players are community heroes and the cheerleaders are busy blowing the football players and working their cocaine connections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. I've never seen a pro-fire sprinkler system
Damn, you must've gone to a tough school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
54. Wagner, Stravinsky (sp?), Beethoven, Mozart, Ravel,
Chopin, Sousa (so he wrote marches, so what?), Dvorak, uhhhhhh.....that's all I can get off the top of my head. Jerry Goldsmith and John Wiliams?

Brad Ellsworth, Richard Lugar, Evan Bayh

GO PACKERS!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
28. Bunting foul the third strike is an out.
C'mon, give the pitchers a chance to put it in play! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
29. The two-line pass rule from hockey.
I am SO glad they got rid of that asinine rule! Although the new prohibition on goalies behind the net is kinda stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HERVEPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. What is that prohibition? Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #32
44. From the wiki:
During the 2004-05 AHL season, an experimental rule was implemented for the first seven weeks of the season. This additional area behind the goal line is officially referred to as the Goaltender Trap Zone, but is more frequently called the trapezoid in reference to its shape. The area consists of a centered, symmetrical trapezoid. The bases of the trapezoid are formed by the goal line and the end boards. The base on the goal line measures 18 feet and the base on the end boards measures 28 feet. It is prohibited for the goaltender to handle the puck anywhere behind the goal line that is not within the trapezoidal area. If he does so he is assessed a minor penalty for delay of game. The motivation for the introduction of the trapezoid was to promote game flow and prolonged offensive attacks by making it more difficult for the goaltender to possess and clear the puck.

The seven-week experiment proved so successful that the AHL moved to enforce the rule for the rest of the season, and then was approved by the NHL when play resumed for the 2005-06 season following the previous lockout. The ECHL, the only other developmental league in the Professional Hockey Players Association (along with the AHL) also approved the rule for 2005-06.




So the goalie can't go behind the goal line to play the puck, except in that trapezoid immediately behind the net.
Silly rule if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HERVEPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #44
53. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
30. No guns on the field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
36. The all star winning league gets home field in the World Series
Millionaires need incentive to play a game? It should be every other year, a system which worked wonderfully for years and years and years.

And the DH SUCKS !!!!!!! When you are old and on steroids and can't run anymore go home instead of to the American League.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abq e streeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #36
73. Agree with you on both
All Star game BS is yet another Fox created contribution towards cheapening American culture. Is there ANYTHING they touch that they don't ruin? (Except the Simpsons)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
38. Officials not throwing out a coach in football.
I've seen football coaches go on tirades on the sidelines that would get a baseball or basketball coach sent to the showers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HERVEPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. Along that line, coaches crossing the line onto the playing area
in any sport (except baseball).
I hate it that they allow basketball coaches to get away with this. Even if they're just shouting instructions to the players.
AND Why the heck do basketball coaches wear ties. They didn't used to. Looks really stupid.

Gee, I sound grumpy. I must be getting old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #42
57. Basketball coaches have always worn ties
Football coasches used to but they stopped because apperal retailers wanted them to pimp their overpriced threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoGOPZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
43. The fumble rule which says the ball can't be advanced
by the offense in the last two minutes unless recoved by the fumbling player, instituted after the Raiders cheated to win a game. If the officials in that game called that play for what it was, an incomplete pass, we wouldn't need this rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #43
52. The Holy Roller
Still one of the great NFL highlight films of all time.

I despise the Raiders, but I really doubt they "cheated." There's an overwhelming natural urge to hold on to the football, since it bounces funny. You try to advance it by fumbling, you're apt to lose it.

(That said, one of the many skills in Australian Rules Football that amazes me is players' ability to dribble the ball on a dead run.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoGOPZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #52
60. All three players involved admitted intentionally moving
the ball in the direction of the end zone. I think the cheating was pretty blatant. I'm fairly indifferent to the Raiders, but this play caused a rule to be enacted that could have been avoided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. Wow, I wasn't aware of that
But now that I'm seeing the play more clearly in my mind, there was one of 'em who seemed to be sort of scooping it along.

Not that the Raiders of those days were adverse to cheating within the rules... Freddie Biletnikoff, Lester Hayes et al. :)



No, really — Stabler masturbated on my jersey.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
47. Boxing: No kicking when the other guy goes down
And they should be allowed to put barbed wire on the outside of the gloves. This isn't some tea-sipping contest. It is the manly art of self-defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
48. The three-pointer in college hoops
the line's too close in. An ordinary jumper now counts for three. Four or five of these in a row, and hardly any lead is safe. The international distance is about right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. I agree it is a ridiculously easy shot
for anyone who plays much (like I used to) 70% is reasonable to expect.

They need to move it out to the international line at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #48
63. I would say the same thing with the dunk shot at any level.
At least a 3-point shot at whatever distance shows shooting ability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
50. Football needs to adopt a "advantage gained" standard to pass interference
it is subjective anyway but they need to determine if anyone actually gained an advantage when there is touching and bumping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
56. In the NBA
the rules that prohibit shots other than dunks or three-pointers and the playing of defense and permit traveling when driving to the basket.

(Strange, isn't it? Thirty years ago, when there was no three-point shot, few dunks and actual defense in the NBA, scores were higher.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 04:15 AM
Response to Reply #56
105. You think there used to be defense in the NBA?
Edited on Thu Nov-15-07 04:16 AM by Awsi Dooger
I flagrantly disagree. I have many of those games on VCR tape and the lack of defense is hysterical when viewed 20 or 25 years later. The famed Lakers/Celtics games were fraudulent as hell. Want an uncontested 10 foot jumper? Be my guest, and make it 8 feet if you want.

I've had friends come over and watch those tapes and literally be speechless at what they were witnessing, compared to their recollections and conventional wisdom. The league was a defenseless farce in the '80s. The guys on the all-league defensive team would have to step up their game considerably to even be considered an average defender today.

There's a reason the average NBA total dropped from more than 218 in the late '80s to in the mid 190s today. It's sustained defensive intensity. Credit Chuck Daly, who snuffed out Showtime and dramatically improved the caliber of the sport. IMO he's never given enough accolades.

Otherwise, the 3 point shot is a joke in college basketball, as KamaAina already pointed out. I still have no idea why a longer shot is worth more points. It should be the reverse, a dunk or inside play rewarded with 3 points and a wimpy give up bomb maybe a point, or less. We used to laugh like hell in playground ball at kids who couldn't play a lick, no threat of passing or defense or fundamentals, and all they did was stand outside and launch long shots. Now those wimps are rewarded. Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 04:53 AM
Response to Reply #105
112. '80s?
I'm talkin' '60s and '70s.

I lost my taste for basketball in the '80s — I think the '85 championships were the last games I watched.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie and algernon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
58. OFFENSIVE pass interference
what a moronic rule. technically, anytime a reciever catches the ball, he's committing offensive pass interference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #58
72. Offensive and defensive players are equally entitled to the ball
Therefore, both are also entitled to equal opportunity for unencumbered access to said ball.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Godhumor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
59. Football--no loss of down for a delay of game
I've never understood this--you have 25 seconds to make a play. If you can not make a play in 25 seconds, shouldn't you lose that down? There should never be an advantage in a game for purposely gaining a penalty to run down the clock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tafiti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #59
75. Ooh, good one. Never thought of that, but you're right, makes more sense.
One I think is overly harsh is when the offense fumbles into the endzone and goes out of bounds, it's a touchback for the other team. What substantive difference is there between fumbling at the 1/2 yard line out of bounds on the sideline and getting the ball at that spot, or fumbling it out of bounds in the endzone? To me, not much. It should be a penalty of some sort, but loss of possession? That's way too harsh, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #75
86. On Godhumor's point,
maybe give the defense a choice between the down or the yards.

On Tafiti's point, that's true, it's a rather large difference between losing it at the 1 yard line and in the end zone. Maybe change the rule to say that if the ball goes out of bounds, then it's down at the last point of possession. If it's fumbled at the five and goes out of bounds at the three, then the last team with possession gets it at the five.

Shall we vote on it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
65. As someone who has never been a sports fan
it's interesting reading this thread. Some of the posts are obviously meant to be humorous, but many of the serious posts might as well be in a foreign language. I can read the words, but they make absolutely no sense to me. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. That's how I feel about the 9/11 Forum!
I know what the words mean...but DAYUM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
66. those are "rules"????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
69. Allowing a baserunner to tag up and advance on a caught foul ball...
It was foul, wasn't it???? So why should the runner get to advance? Doesn't make any sense!

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. If it's caught on the fly, it's in play
Doesn't matter if it's fair or foul.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikeargo Donating Member (279 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
71. The shootout in the NHL
Either play until someone wins, or accept a tie game. Getting a point for a loss (overtime or shootout) makes no sense - a team could lose every game and still make the playoffs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudbase Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
74. The ground can't cause a fumbe.
The hell it cant!

And another one: holding the football over the goal line to score. Move your whole body over the line, buddy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
76. The rediculous "Cheerleaders can't celebrate TDs with firearms" rule. Jeeze, people!
Get with the 21st century already, wouldja? In a well armed society, all cheerleaders would be able to fire off a couple yahoo shots when their boys do good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
recoveringdittohed Donating Member (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #76
97. Advocating celebratory gunfire for teams whose mascot is a Bruin or Bear...
Would be supporting the right to arm bears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bixente Donating Member (464 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
78. Football/soccer
Players receiving bookings for "over celebrating" - for example, taking your shirt off is deemed a punishable offence. Come on, they're human, it's an emotional game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #78
79. hear hear!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
80. The shootout in the NHL and the DH in MLB
I would rather see a tie than have a good hockey game end in a shootout. I wish they would have just increased the length of the overtime period.

The DH I just think is lame, just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
81. Basketball - the fouling team could get possession
after a free throw.

Give the fouled team a free throw, and then possession. That'll stop the intentional fouling that makes the last five minutes go for half an hour. If fouls only have consequences and not advantages, the clock will run.

Or put the fouler in a penalty box, bring the power-play to BBall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
83. Football - pushing an airborn receiver OOB
should be allowed. This suggestion comes from Mike Golic. The way the rule is currently enforced is way too subjective. The official must determine if the receiver would have landed in bounds or not. Golic's solution is to simply get rid of the rule and just go by where the receiver's feet land, whether he's puched or not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #83
84. Does NCAA do it that way?
You're right, there's a lot of subjectivity in that kind of ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #84
87. I pretty sure that's the way the NCAA does it
Seems like a simple solution.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
recoveringdittohed Donating Member (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #83
115. Sooo, a guy catches a pass over the middle going airborne,
Two or three defenders grab him and make sure his feet don't hit the ground and try to carry him to the sideline to throw him out of bounds. Meanwhile his teammates try to tackle the defenders and receiver before they reach the sidelines. A recipe for hilarity (and multiple offsetting personal fouls).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #115
117. It would be a good change
Edited on Thu Nov-15-07 10:01 AM by pokerfan
Under current rules what's to prevent a bunch of linemen from picking up a ball carrier and walking him into the endzone for two points.

Most officials would blow the play dead at that point. Forward progress etc.

I say most, because I have no idea what the Pac-10 officials are going to inflict upon us next.

Those of you who watched the Washington - Oregon State game know what I'm talking about.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
85. shootout in both NHL and soccer
both should have left well enough alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 05:36 AM
Response to Reply #85
114. AMEN!!
The dumbest thing in soccer is supporting your team through qualifying, into the World Cup, then into the later rounds or even the final, just to see the game decided by which keeper guesses correctly left or right.

It's like having a tied basketball game be decided by alternating free throws. Absurd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
89. Fan interference in baseball
There should be a zero tolerance policy for this. You interfere with the game, you're out on your ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
90. "Running into the kicker" in football
What a weakass penalty. I can live with roughing the kicker but when a team gets a first down because their punter flops, I hate that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
91. I hate the 20 foot rule in Women's Flat Track Roller Derby


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perseid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
93. no kicking in the private places
and no having intimate relations while on the field during a game.

I hate those rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cabcere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
94. The apparent unwritten "rule"
that certain Ivy League women's crew teams don't get penalized for a) pushing past another (non-Ivy League) crew to start the race before their signal is given, thus getting an illegal head start and b) clashing their oars against the oars of said non-Ivy League crew, which is not only dangerous and illegal but poor sportsmanship as well. :mad: :grr: :mad: :grr: Wankers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
98. Alternate Possession in NCAA basketball
It's called a "JUMP BALL" for a goddamned reason!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
99. Having to wear clothes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BulletproofLandshark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
101. Pass interference in the NFL being penalized as a spot foul.
How many games have you seen where a team gets a go-ahead score late in the game because of some ticky-tack incidental contact that puts the ball deep in the defense's territory? The penalty should be the same as high school and college:15 yards and an automatic 1st down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perseid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
103. rule #48
Sports "heroes" shall be paid at minimum one hundred million times the minimum wage, plus other guaranteed benefits that shall not be revealed.

God, I hate that rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
104. Onside kick - that's just wrong nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skyblue Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
106. Soccer - that it's a good thing to hit a ball with your head nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skyblue Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #106
107. Football - that running people down to the ground is considered a sport nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skyblue Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
108. Boxing - That beating someone up is considered a sport nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
109. Clock stopping after a sack
I've never understood that, since childhood. It essentially penalizes the defense for making a successful play. Often the trailing team is desperately trying to pass and is sacked, yet the damn clock bails them out by stopping briefly. I saw it several times last Sunday. The league changed the rules somewhat a few years ago and the clock does not stop for as long as it used to, but it shouldn't stop at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
110. Tuck rule
The entire intent of that rule is to prevent a ball from being ruled a fumble, if it slips out of the QBs hand when he changes his mind and tries to stop the forward motion.

But they've taken it to ludicrous extreme by insisting the ball has to be fully tucked, before it can be ruled a fumble. The Tom Brady play from '01 is the obvious example, pulled down and being touched with both hands yet somehow it's not a fumble. Hell, Brady knew it was a fumble. Check his reaction.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
111. I would eliminate pass interference
If you can tackle the receiver, do it. Congratulations. No harm, no ludicrous penalty.

Nothing changes a game like that call and somehow they assume the second half of the equation, the catch, is automatic.

It might seem like an extreme change that would harm the game if you allowed any contact, but offensive coordinators and receivers would find a way around it. It would be fascinating. You'd also get rid of penalties for pick plays, garbage like that. It would open up so many creative permutations, instead of give-up thoughtless plays like the fade pass.

Give the game back to the brutes. As a Dolphin fan in the early '70s I used to crack up when our cornerbacks chopped the opposing WRs, perfectly legal at that point. The QB dropped back and his prime target was already out of the equation, sprawled on the Poly Turf. Now that was football. The current version is pantyhose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
113. I'd get rid of the drop areas in golf
Stupid rule that benefits amateurs but the pros don't need it. Like at Sawgrass every year on the 17th hole. Make the trembling pros tee it up repeatedly from the original location instead of the much shorter shot to the left.

Overall the water hazard rules in golf are far too lenient. You hit it in a lake and are allowed the full distance if it is a lateral hazard. Often the penalty is inconsequential, particularly on a par 5. They drop where the ball bounced into the water then it's a simple chip and putt to salvage par.

I would make it more like out of bounds, hitting from the original location. That might eliminate some risk taking but imagine the high hilarity, stuff like Tin Cup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skyblue Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
118. That sports enthusiasts have to have that lower IQ, unsophisticated, neanderthal grace of Mac Truck
Why some of us prefer creative types.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skyblue Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
119. That "Coach" is usually somewhat of a bully. nt
Edited on Thu Nov-15-07 10:38 AM by skyblue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skyblue Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
120. That some sports enthusiasts think beer bellies are more attractive or manly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skyblue Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
121. The soft porn cheerleader thing is pretty much sexist nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC