This is the smartest, most intellectual thread you ever clicked into...

[Tuesday Afternoon]

simply because you have :)

[The Straight Story]

1. Well then, let's discuss something :)

Like, what are ghosts anyway???

[Archae]

2. Alcohol-generated

:evilgrin:

[The Straight Story]

4. They don't call alcohol 'spirits' for nothing

:)

[The Inquisitive]

7. good pun

I give it a 8/10

[Tuesday Afternoon]

3. they are a pigment of ether

[CaliforniaPeggy]

5. My dear Tuesday Afternoon!

Ooooh.....smooooooth!

;)

:hug:

[Tuesday Afternoon]

6. awww ----hugs and kisses for you dear Peg

:*

:hug:

[DarkTirade]

8. This is not the smartest, most intellectual response you have ever read...

this is just a tribute.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

11. awww

:blush:

:hi:

[The Inquisitive]

9. Not enough isms.

We need more words containing neo, post, classical, modern and ending with ism in order for this thread to rule them all.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

10. Welcome to the DU Lounge

:hi:

[Dr. Strange]

12. This reminds me of something I was reading just the other day...

There are many natural scientists, and especially physicists, who continue to reject the notion that the disciplines concerned with social and cultural criticism can have anything to contribute, except perhaps peripherally, to their research. Still less are they receptive to the idea that the very foundations of their worldview must be revised or rebuilt in the light of such criticism. Rather, they cling to the dogma imposed by the long post-Enlightenment hegemony over the Western intellectual outlook, which can be summarized briefly as follows: that there exists an external world, whose properties are independent of any individual human being and indeed of humanity as a whole; that these properties are encoded in "eternal" physical laws; and that human beings can obtain reliable, albeit imperfect and tentative, knowledge of these laws by hewing to the "objective" procedures and epistemological strictures prescribed by the (so-called) scientific method.

Wouldn't you agree?

[Tuesday Afternoon]

13. Yes, I think I would...

if I am sure I understand it correctly :D

[BarenakedLady]

14. You are correct!

It is!

:D

[Tuesday Afternoon]

15. but of course!!

in good company, as well :pals: