Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stanley Kubrick would have been 79 today.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:14 AM
Original message
Stanley Kubrick would have been 79 today.
Stan was the man.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MAGICBULLET Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. would you agree that
Eyes Wide Shut was as bad as everyone made it out to be? I liked it, especially the pace, yet it wasn't my favorite.
Barry Lyndon was beautiful, and underrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Barry Lyndon was underrated ...
I wish he did the film on Napoleon that people said he wanted to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MAGICBULLET Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. YES!
and also Artificial Intelligence, instead of having Spielberg dumb it down. Overall it was nice, but certain sequences were obviously full of Spielbergesque cheese that I don't think Kubrick would've kept in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Never saw AI and that's why!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. It's almost like you could tell which parts were Kubrick's, which were Spielberg's
The good parts were Kubrick's.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ghostsofgiants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I like Eyes Wide Shut as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. No I liked EWS.
The only film of his I've never seen was his first Fear and Desire; and the documentary The Seafarers. I'm sure all the folks who hate EWS are hardcore Cruise-haters. But he was okay in EWS. And lots of good sites on the web with first rate analyses of the film.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kay1864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. *sniff*
What a brilliant mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ghostsofgiants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kubrick was awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. My favorite director.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. loved him, although I have not yet seen Eyes Wide Shut
I keep forgetting that when I go to the video store. Loved Barry Lyndon and would like to see that again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MAGICBULLET Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. get Paths of Glory too
in case you haven't seen that one yet, I guess even if you have. :) :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I have not, although I've heard it's great
I'm also a fan of Kirk Douglas movies, so I'm kinda surprised I have not seen it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. 'Fail Safe'
'nuff said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Could anyone take "Fail-Safe" seriously
after seeing Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb? Both movies were made in 1964. IMHO Dr. Strangelove is the greatest movie ever made, whereas Fail-Safe is a POS.

Yes, I know that Kubrick thought 2001 was his masterpiece. There is room for more than one opinion about this, especially with movies as good as these.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Were you an attorney for Columbia Pictures?
That was their line of thinking when they sued Eugene Burdick and Harvey Wheeler, the authors of "Fail-Safe," their publisher and the film's production company for plagiarism, claiming that Burdick and Wheeler ripped off "Red Alert," on which "Dr. Strangelove" was based.

The real purpose of the suit was to delay production of "Fail-Safe" so it would come out after "Dr. Strangelove" and bomb at the box office, since a comedy can successfully follow a drama, but rarely the other way around. And that's exactly what happened.

"Fail-Safe" is a piece of shit? Hardly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Your honor, I plead NOT GUILTY.
I swear upon a stack of bibles, korans, and books by Charles Darwin that I am not, and never have been, an attorney for Columbia Pictures or anyone else. All I know about the law is what I learned from Perry Mason.

Your post, on the other hand, reads like what a lawyer on the other side might have said to a reporter. You can't really know what "the real purpose" was unless you are a mind reader. But it sounds very sinister.

When I call Fail-Safe a POS, I am not talking about the acting, direction, cinematography, etc. I mean that the plot was no more believable than that of Dr. Strangelove. For a serious movie, that is a serious flaw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I think it was believable
up to the point where President Fonda said, "Gee, Russians, we're sorry. If we nuke New York City, will that make up for it?" That was just ridiculous.

Y'gotta remember the geopolitical mindset when it was made, though. A lot of people thought like Groteschele — that the eee-vill commies wanted to wipe us off the face of the Earth. And, like him, a lot of people wanted to do it to them first.

Now, there were a few things that bugged me because they weren't accurate, since the Department of Defense refused cooperation with the producers. Like, it kinda sucked that they used stock footage of three different types of fighters to show the "Skyscrapers." But what can you do when the military boycotts you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. 6-part youtube series about him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yep, he was a genius...
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. It would have been interesting to see what "AI" would have been like...
had Kubrick lived to complete the movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ekirh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. Happy Birthday to the Great Kubrick . . .
I may have to put in Dr. Strangelove tonight . . . still probably my favorite movie ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC