OMG! that Heidi chick on CNN!!! someone needs to do *something*...

[bridgit]

with that child's hair! :spray: :rofl:

[idgiehkt]

1. your sig line just blew my mind

but I don't know who Heidi is.

[bridgit]

2. she's a morning anchor on CNN, but if i had access to her makeup & hair...

people, assuming of course though not by the looks of it; i'd be begging for someone to help me!!

[idgiehkt]

3. what does he mean to "speak in primordial images"?

I'm trying to figure that one out. I think Jung makes a whole lot more sense than Freud even though they kind of handled different subject matter. Time for deep thoughts, I guess.

[zingaro]

4. Jung was big into archetypes and how they speak to the

collective unconscious, whether on a personal or universal level. The whole primordial images thing refers to how a specific archetype would tweak everyone whether they knew it or not.

:)

[idgiehkt]

7. "whether they knew it or not"

there's a thought. I guess I need to add some specific archetypes to my vocabulary then, lol.

[bridgit]

5. i think one read is that certainly some things are more immediate than others...

images in particular are immediate i.e. speaking a thousand words, etc...a kitty licking milk from a saucer, a mud-man sharpening a stick, a NYC cabbie waiting for a fare, an Amazon rain-forest resident dropping a monkey from a tree with a blow gun...stuff like that & more; there was a B&W photo playbook some years back: 'they became what they beheld', Noonan is a purveyor of the genre http://www.uplandsgallery.com/artists_details.php?id=6 i liked it, i always shot in B&W when i did photojournalism myself though not per se for that reason

we're big on art around this house, this being we believe hubby & i, a world filled with symbols ergo in an ergo nutshell,

"Whoever speaks in primordial images speaks with a thousand voices..."

[Flaxbee]

6. you don't like it bouffant?

is that what you're talking about? Anchors ALWAYS have WAY too much makeup on, but I think her hair is nice poufed up a bit. I hate flat stringy no-style hair - I think shampoo-and-set styles look nice. And they're becoming a lot more popular, too. No more blow-outs, many more sets.

[bridgit]

8. Heidi's hair is in that in-between phase where in some future months...

it may be more manageable, but seems at least imo that there is MORE THAN PLENTY there to work with for now so as to say :rofl: perhaps a little shaping, reminds me i need to make an appointment i'll say that much. what? you don't like Susan Lisovicz; hair too "stringy" http://www.cnn.com/CNN/anchors_reporters/lisovicz.susan.html :)

[Flaxbee]

9. no, hers looks pretty, has some shape

yesterday, though, they had Jeanne Moos on and it looked like her hair was plastered to her head, and she's got a long, rather square face anyway, and it just looked baaaad. Some people can easily do sleek-and-straight, but most of us need a little lift (esp. if you never get enough sleep, like me).

I have to admit to being a converted woman, though: when in Helsinki, I had a shampoo-and-set with some bouffant styling (not 'helmet head', but my hair had definite lift) and I LOVED it. The whole experience (very pampering) and the way it looked afterward, and it lasted 2 full days. I used to be just shampoo and run, but now I like a little more styling. Maybe I'm just turning into an old poop.

[bridgit]

10. well, essentially disagreed, Heidi has looked better, but they've been...

suiting her up in colors that are less than flattering (you know that thing they do where they put color chips up next to your face to determine your 'flow' and such), plus she used to be a tad more gregarious, perhaps someone sat her down and explained...something, who knows, but i like the Heidi-look from last year :thumbsup:e

Jeanne Moss *is* another matter :)

me? i'm still shampoo & run so what the heck do i know for sure :rofl: