Last night on the local news in Pittsburgh was the story of a construction worker who had lost his arm and was now having it reattached:
http://www.thepittsburghchannel.com/news/2722658/detail.htmlAs we were watching the story, I commented to my husband how wonderful it was that nowadays severed limbs can be reattached. He replied that hospitals will only attempt to reattach limbs IF YOU HAVE INSURANCE.
When I asked where he had heard this, he offered up the story told to him by a woman who tends bar at the place where he stops for beer now and then. She said that her son had accidentally cut several fingers off with a circular saw. When he and his severed fingers were rushed to the hospital, the doctors in the emergency room threw the fingers into the biohazard container, bandaged up the hand, and sent him off with a prescription for painkillers. The woman said she was so upset when they threw away the fingers that, when the nurses weren’t looking, she retrieved the fingers from the biohazard container. She has them at home in her freezer in case they can be reattached someday.
The ultimate point of this gruesome little story is that the woman claimed that the doctors made the decision not to reattach the fingers when they learned that her son had no insurance.
This is, admittedly, a story I heard third hand from a biased source with severed fingers in her freezer, but it really made me wonder if we have reached the point where your insurance coverage determines whether you get to keep your limbs or not. I had always thought that hospitals do their best to treat you regardless of coverage and work out the details later.
My oldest son is working at a job with no health insurance so this is really bothering me.