Okay, this is weird & tacky, and yet it's so neoclassical. Yet it's weird

[Bucky]

That's Senator Clinton at left and General Washington at right. I oppose double standards & stuff, and I know Hillary wants Washington's old job... and yet I feel there's something wrong here. Or is it just me?

[Shakespeare]

1. Well, for starters, she has no nipples.

I think it would be less weird if she had nipples. Still weird, but less weird.

[amitten]

2. Well, American politicians aren't typically depicted NAKED.

What weirdo made these things?

These busts couldn't have been rendered clothed???

[HarukaTheTrophyWife]

5. Actually, if you look closely she is clothed.

Unless she naturally has lacy nipple-free breasts.

[Mz Pip]

3. Doesn't look like her

I would not look at that bust and recognize Hillary. And that is just the face.

Mz Pip
:dem:

[Generic Brad]

4. It's a double standard unless we see Washington's man boobs

I want to see Founding Founder nipples, for crying out loud.

(Interesting. There is no appropriate smiley available that would denote the Founding Father's man boobs).

[NMMNG]

6. Why is it

that George's face is depicted as relatively smooth yet the sculptor made Hillary look positively ragged?

[Floogeldy]

7. This is so obviously Freeper bullshit.

[petronius]

8. Wasn't that made by the same guy who did the Britney Spears

giving birth statue? I thought it was supposed to be a joke (or at least not meant to be taken entirely seriously).