Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should the Rolling Stones have broken up 20 years ago?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 01:10 AM
Original message
Should the Rolling Stones have broken up 20 years ago?
I'm only a casual fan of the Stones -- not a huge one, but everyone I know says that their peak was the late 60s/early 70s although "Some Girls" (1978) is said to be good.

Still, a comparison with the Beatles is apt. I think part of the reasons the Beatles have worn so well is b/c they broke up before they could decline - and though they would've been better together than on their own in the mid-'70s, that slump that brought us such mid-70s garbage as "Listen to What the Man Said" and John Lennon's "Somewhere in NYC" (great political themes, crappy music) would still have occurred.

The Stones, by contrast kept going past their prime. Every talent deteriorates after awhile, and while it does come and go in cycles, there is usually a definite peak that is never again equalled. The Stones have stuck around, and I feel their music really deteriorated.

As an aside, it sort of annoys me how the Stones have had so many members -- really, what IS the Stones? To me, it just seems to be Mick and Keith at it's core -- there's not been a continuous equivalent of "John, Paul, George, Ringo" -- the lineup has changed so much.

Should the Stones have broken up sometime in the late 70's or early 80's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blade Donating Member (624 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Heck yeah...
they were bad then and they're worse now. Enough is enough already!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes Yes a thousand times yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hell no
For octagenarians, they still put on a hell of a live show, even if they're not making anything new that's better than mediocre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. maybe not brroken up . . .
they are, after all, something of a family . . . but definitely stopped touring . . . watching a 60-year-old Jagger prancing around singing "Satisfaction" (which is something he once swore he'd never do) whilst fingering his navel and displaying his "package" (likely artificially enhanced now) is disconcerting, to say the least . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think "Tattoo You" should have been their cut-off point.
Great album, especially side two. After that, they were useless except as a museum attraction. And the whole run of albums from "Goat's Head Soup" to "Some Girls" could be boiled down to one decent C-60 mix tape; lotsa filler got loose in Keith's heroin years.


Gimme "Exile on Main Street" any fuggin' day of the week, though- it doesn't get any better than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC