Why is there no Jason Leopold thread over here?

[6000eliot]

They appear to be all the rage in GD.

[KitchenWitch]

1. We loungers march to a different drummer.

[6000eliot]

4. It's almost as if you don't care

about the biggest controversies of the day!

[KitchenWitch]

8. No, that is not the case!

But the Lounge is not for controversy. I read GD, and I post in the Lounge.

[huskerlaw]

2. ...

:yoiks:

[pitohui]

3. oh, he'll be lounge fodder soon enough i'm sure

he's about as real as that kato kaolen guy from o j simpson days

[6000eliot]

5. Who?

[LeftyMom]

6. It's the lounge

When he has an unfortunate misspelling in a photo, suffers some awful but funny accident or posts the Brazillain joke on Truthout, be sure to let us know.

Until then we'll herk around and joke about stupid shit. :D

[6000eliot]

7. I don't think "stupid shit" is limited to the lounge

I'm just sayin'

[LeftyMom]

9. I suspect you may be right.

;)

[Dave Reynolds]

10. I almost started one,

but I took it to GD instead.

Silly fuckin me.

[Blue-Jay]

11. Take that shit to GD!

We in the Lounge usually like to "wait & see".

You know....like smart people.

[no name no slogan]

12. Who the hell is Jason Leopold?

or is this another ridiculous acronym like LIHOP/MIHOP?

[6000eliot]

13. He's apparently important for some reason.

[ContraBass Black]

19. He's the one who keeps coming out with amazing leaks from

Fitzgerald's office. He dropped a bomb last week, and we're waiting to see if it comes true.

[Kerrytravelers]

14. We're not a part of their cool world.

An illustration of GD:

[6000eliot]

17. Do you have one where the smilies are hitting each other?

[Kerrytravelers]

20. I can steal many emoticons of anger and violence.

[AuntiBush]

15. LOL

Thanks, 6000eliot.

[NNadir]

16. Those threads scare even me.

I don't think I scare easily, and I have many times ventured into GD without fear.

I don't get the point, actually.

[6000eliot]

18. The point?

See Kerrytravelers above.

[Kerrytravelers]

21. My emoticon is very spot-on, no?