Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Clint Eastwood a republican, or not?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 04:36 AM
Original message
Is Clint Eastwood a republican, or not?
His films seem so liberal-- it just seems odd. You'd think he'd try to put more of a rw spin on things, particularly the ones he produces/directs if he is.

Anyone know about this?

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not sure, I believe he is actually Libertarian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thanks KW--
that would probably explain his more 'progressive' leanings--at least in his films.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 05:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Here is a link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks for the link!
Interesting party philosophy--'everyone leaves everyone else alone.'

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I like that idea myself...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. The flip side is that's their approach to poverty and health care too.
But whatever Eastwood's politics are, he's made some pretty good films over the years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Oh my--that's a little scary, isn't it?
Oh well--no political party is perfect, is it? LOL!

I like many of his films, too. With issues that range from saving a death row inmate at the last moment, euthanasia and exposing political corruption--they just didn't really fit in line with a rw agenda, imo. LOL!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Clint Eastwood is done, who cares, just dust in the wind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. The Dirty Harry movies are liberal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. If The DH movies were liberal than Bronson's Death Wish series
Edited on Sun Dec-18-05 06:23 AM by DanCa
a heart warming story of a man trying to overcome with his grief . :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. LOL-mitchum
I was referring to his more recent films. But thinking of Dirty Harry as liberal is pretty funny.

"You feel lucky, punk--we'll do 'ya? After I shoot you, I'll personally drive you to the hospital, sit by your side, nurse your wounds and then make sure all of your medical expenses are paid. Then, I'll make sure you get enrolled in a program that rehabilitates you, gives you a great job and helps you move your family out of the trailer park. Oh and I'm really sorry for calling you punk. What is your name, sir?"

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Now THAT'S funny
well done :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Thank you--
:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
8. Many people were repubs before the neo cons took over.
Eastwood could be tied to the NRA or have bought into the lie the repubs are the party of fiscal responsibility. The republican party has changed dramaticaly in the last few years, my dad said Ronald Reagan would be rolling over in his grave if he knew what the gop stands for today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Not to dispute your dad--
Edited on Sun Dec-18-05 07:26 PM by bliss_eternal
(or be disrespectful toward either of you), but Reagan kind of helped usher in the 'hateful' aspects of today's neocons. Ron was no angel. He certainly wasn't 'Republican lite', not from where I sat.

In many ways, I think he'd be rather proud of what they've done--but that's just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
10. He's republican the way they use to be decades ago
Republicans weren't always these disgustingly close-minded pigs. Unfortunately they allowed the party to be hijacked by the neo-conservative fundelmentalists and they took over the party. Republican party use to mean small government and conservative spending but one look at today's republican lead government you can tell it's nothing even close to conservative spending or small government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xmas74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Exactly.
I can respect an old-time Repub (not saying that I agree w/ them but can respect them). Their party and ideals once meant something.
There are a few actors that were affliated w/ the Repub party in the past that you now have to wonder if they would feel the same today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. No, and here's why
He is an independent, if anything. He has too many brains and subtleties to be a Republican.

Consider this quote, from an interview he did in 2004:

"I never considered myself a conservative. Of course, I am no extreme leftist either."

I like that. He NEVER considered himself a conservative.

As for Dirty Harry, that was a timely cultural phenomenon. We are SUPPOSED to be provoked and uncomfortable by the character. There was a bit of zeitgeist in the film to the backlash at the time of the rising violent crime rate and the feeling of helplessness urbanites had. But in the end, playing Dirty Harry is not endorsing Dirty Harry.

Consider too, what "Unforgiven" says about the senselessness of violence as a solution to problems.

Eastwood is hard to pigeonhole. As a director though, he has summoned some of the finest performances from some of our most liberal actors, such as Sean Penn, Tim Robbins, and Morgan Freeman. All of them are good friends, and bound to have his ear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I found Unforgiven so unsettling--
I think it bothered me even more because people in the theater laughed during some of the scenes I found most disturbing. Couldn't tell if they just laughed out of their own discomfort of if they were just dunderheads that didn't get it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hickman1937 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
20. He used to be a republican when it meant something.
A pre-reagun republican. I believe he left around the lee atwater days. The marriage of eugenics(as carried on by white supremacist's) with evangelism probably made him realize that this was not his dad's republican party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC