Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Resort Owner Bans Children From Hotel But Allows Dogs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 06:37 AM
Original message
Resort Owner Bans Children From Hotel But Allows Dogs
Edited on Mon Oct-17-05 06:37 AM by matcom
:popcorn:

<snip>

THE owner of an exclusive alpine resort has banned young children but is still allowing dogs in his hotel.

Roland Ballner says that children are always badly behaved and have vandalised his hotel and upset other guests on many previous occasions.

"My guests have a right to quiet and relaxation without the noise of children," said Mr Ballner, the owner of Hotel Cortisen at St Wolfgang.

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,16937790-13762,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Matcom, you are so evil
You just made yourself a big bowl of popcorn, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. extra butter
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
32. And probably a box of Milk-Duds, too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hmmmmmmmm.....
:popcorn: isn't my idea of breakfast, but it is appropriate right now.

And Mr. Ballner needs to remember that he was once a child. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pool Hall Ace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
23. You seem like such a sweet person.
"And Mr. Ballner needs to remember that he was once a child."

But I wish that anemic line could be retired. It has no meaning at all.

Perhaps Mr. Ballner was taught manners as a child, and that is why his tolerance for poor behavior is very low.

http://www.happilychildfree.com/breeders.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SarahB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Not a problem.
I have kids.
I work with kids.
I love kids.

However, if I'm paying big bucks to vacation and have "grown-up" time, I don't want to deal with someone else's kid bugging me in any way. I'd be more than happy to have kid-free resorts or restaurants to have that option if I want. Believe it or not, even those of us who like kids don't want to be attempting to have a romantic dinner at a nice restaurant (i.e. not a family restaurant) and hear someone's screaming 2 year old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I totally agree with you, but it will be fun to watch this thread
Grow and grow and grow.....

I'm having a bad morning, so this is a good distraction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marc_the_dem Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
26. there's a segment of society...
that prefers domestic animals over children... this guy caters to them and probably does well in doing so...

I'll take my $ and children elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #26
35. I think it's fine for that certain types of vacations/resorts to be
"child-free," and I guarantee alot of loving parents would enjoy that, too. Not Disney Word, Myrtle Beach, the Grand Canyon, etc., but there are certain types of restaurants or resorts that are very much adult-oriented. It does NOT mean people don't like kids. Geez.

I love my cat, but I wouldn't take her here: she's too choosy, and might not like the sheet thread count.

* I just called my mom -- she said she would have LOVED a place like this when we were growing, so she and Dad could go chill out for a weekend.....

MATCOM IS EVIL!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pool Hall Ace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. I've never been owned by a cat, but I am familiar enough
with them where I could totally see this.

"I love my cat, but I wouldn't take her here: she's too choosy, and might not like the sheet thread count."

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. I stay broke buying linen for her... no IKEA sheets for her n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In_The_Wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. Is it a chain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. I can go for that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. i thought this would have been quite a dilemma for you?
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. It was
But I'll be much less likely to find dogs going side to side almost perpendicular to the ski slopes.

And I can throw some bibles at the dogs :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. ah yes
the 'Gideon Punishment' :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. And what's wrong with going almost perpendicular to the slope?
Huh? Some perfectly mature adults do that too. Admittedly they are scardy-cat adults who have ended up on slopes that are too steep for their meagre skills, but still.

(Oh, alright, I'll go back to the lodge and drink for the afternoon)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. Cosmopolitans, anyone?
>(Oh, alright, I'll go back to the lodge and drink for the afternoon)

Let's bring southlandshari, too. :woohoo: Drinks are on me, ladies!

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southlandshari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. I'm SO there!
Edited on Mon Oct-17-05 09:52 AM by southlandshari
:woohoo:



:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #22
34. How 'bout a nice tequila drink, Julie?
We won't tell Bart, but we could even go with the house brand for for margueritas!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southlandshari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. ....
:rofl:

























don't tell any of the other mods I laughed at that...

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. i'm alerting on this post
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southlandshari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Have I told you lately...
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. I have no problem with this!!
Why shouldn't there be resort places that are geared specifically for 'adults only'.

There's a reason I've never vacation in Orlando Fl - I find nothing relaxing when it comes to a vacation where I am surrounded by children especially when, yes, too many of them are totally out-of-control and their parents do nothing to calm them down. I've watched Nanny 911 on Fox and let me tell you - I see those same kids at the mall and other places.

So you know what - I would patronize a place like this where I know that I could enjoy my vacation without the distraction of obnoxious crazed kids.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlas Mugged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. Same here
I love to go shopping when the kids are in school, too. That's the ONLY time you'll ever find me in a mall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
40. Heck
I'm the mother of a 3 year old and I've got no problems with this at all. There are times I'd prefer to vacation with the dogs and leave the kid at home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xmas74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
14. I'm a parent and I have no problem w/ this.
There are places that should be adult only. Adult time is important. Who wants kids barging in on their quiet time? We should have places that are for adults only and places that are family-oriented.
Of course, I don't think kids are always badly behaved. I've been around many adults who behaved much worse than a child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. But it's so much easier to kick out
Edited on Mon Oct-17-05 08:21 AM by China_cat
a badly behaving adult than it is to remove an out of control child. Same goes for a badly behaving dog.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xmas74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. It can be.
Depends on how bad the adult is. I used to be a dispatcher-I've got the stories. Children usually don't threaten w/ violence, compared to the adults that I've had to send officers out for.
Really, this is a great tool for families. Parents can look at the area and maybe get it through their thick skulls that this may not be the place to take Jr. on vacation. If one hotel is adults only than you can assume that many places in that area will probably cater to adults. Maybe they will decide that this is not the right kind of vacation for their family and will look at the known family destinations instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. The thing is that if you even dare to verbally try to
correct a child not your own, you run the risk of a lawsuit. I've seen it happen when you try to stop a child from doing something dangerous. All you do is TELL them not to do it and you have a parent in your face yelling at you that you DO NOT correct their child under ANY circumstances and if you continue they WILL bring in their lawyer.

Even when what you were trying to do was keep them from pulling a heavy piece of equipment down on their own heads.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. Oh yeah
You'll hear this from librarians often: They try to keep a child from climbing over a railing where they can fall 20 feet down a staircase, and end up with the parent (who, of course, was on the computer 15 seconds before with no clue where the child was) in their face screaming about "Don't you touch my child".

But, if the kid had fallen and ended up a cabbage for the rest of her life, the parent would sue faster than you can "shouldhavehadavasectomy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xmas74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #19
37. That's why if it's bad enough you call the police.
Many will come down and speak w/ the child themselves, tell the parents it's time to leave and make a juvenile referral if needed.
When it comes to kids just call the police. It's easier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
47. Want real fun? Verbally correct PARENTS!
Or, in this case, breeders.

I'm walking down the aisle just this very afternoon and a woman was letting her 4-year-old kid hang off the side of a shopping cart. I see it and ask the woman to not let her child hang off the side of the cart. She whipped the cart to the side so she more easily get to me to chew my ass for telling her what to do.

Unfortunately for her kid, she whipped him right into a steel upright--which is bolted to the floor.

He's still alive, so far as I know--he hit hard enough you could hear it. (My ears are still ringing from the screaming, though.) And both I and the manager I called hope she sues--we'll be more than happy to testify as to what happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
21. No flames yet, to my surprise!
My personal feeling is: good!

I'd like to see more of this sort of thing, actually. I wish more hotel/resort owners would go after "niche" markets.

Child-free choices
Pet-free choices
Smoke-free choices (not just specific rooms, but the whole establishment)
Alcohol-free choices
etc.

And then have the reverse:

Child-friendly choices
Pet-friendly
Smoker-friendly
Alcohol-friendly
etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. Republican-free choices
and religious nut free choices

That's what I want
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
25. Now if we could just get villages and cities to do the same...
and eventually states...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
28. Sounds good to me
I have kids but fully understand the need to either get away from the kids or if you dont have kids, not be around them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
29. Matcom - seems you're not getting that much of a flame war
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #29
36. i just report the news
let the PEOPLE decide what stories to flame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. I want my money back!
:P The popcorn is already stale! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
31. hahahahahahahaha
That's awesome. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
33. Why is this even getting press?
There are plenty of adults-only hotels and resorts. There are B&Bs that don't allow kids -- even in relatively family-friendly destinations. Last I checked, Hedonism doesn't let kids in, and nobody's complained about that.

Is it because the owner makes a point of allowing dogs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
41. Hey, I can agree with that.
Dogs are so much better behaved than little kids. At least dogs understand sit, stay and shut up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
42. That Suits Me Just Fine.
Edited on Mon Oct-17-05 11:54 AM by arwalden
If dogs can be banned from other hotels. If Sandals Resort can prohibit gay couples... then this shouldn't be a problem either.

Children carry more communicable diseases than dogs do too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 12:30 PM
Original message
I didn't know Sandals does that... really???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pool Hall Ace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
45. At one time, Sandals did ban gay couples, but apparently
that has been rescinded.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/gayrights/story/0,12592,1325051,00.html

Holiday firm ends ban on gay couples

David Hencke, Westminster correspondent
Tuesday October 12, 2004

A holiday company which turned away gay couples from its resorts unexpectedly lifted the ban last night in the face of a campaign by an ex-government minister and sexual equality groups.

Sandals, the Caribbean resort company, announced it was lifting its ban on same-sex couples from 13 resorts, just before a spokesman was due to appear to defend its policy with the former minister, Barbara Roche, on BBC Radio 4's Today programme this morning. The company has resorts in Jamaica, St Lucia, Antigua and Bahamas.

Article continues
Sandals was under commercial pressure from London's mayor, Ken Livingstone, who had banned its advertisements from the tube because of its homophobic attitude to clients. Mr Livingstone was seeking to extend the ban to London's taxis.

Last night Mrs Roche claimed victory after receiving the news in a statement from the company's political lobbyists, Brown Lloyd James, that it had "recently lifted the ban on same sex couples". The statement was confirmed to the Guardian by the lobbyists. Sandals has operated a ban since 2001 and has been criticised for it in parliament.

See link for rest of article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
44. Oh. Wont. Somebody. Please. Think. Of. The. Children?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyskank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. They WERE thinking of the children!
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC