Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I don't give a hoot about Wesley Clark

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:35 PM
Original message
I don't give a hoot about Wesley Clark
Am I a DU misfit? :scared: :cry: :scared: :cry: :scared: :cry: :scared: :cry: :scared: :cry: :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've got the fire extinguisher ready ..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Droopy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. I like Clark
But not enough to post in the Wes Clark group. I think there are some people here that would agree with you, though. So you are not a misfit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ist in his class at west point, purple heart in Vietn, working class roots
There's a lot to like. But then I don't trust or like Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Smile when you that ...........
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. 30 years of military indoctrination is something to like?
The man spent his entire adult life looking for military solutions to political problems. We have a CIVILIAN government. After 30 years, you may leave the military but it doesn't leave you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Droopy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. But I heard that he had similar social and domestic views
as Kucinich. If that's true the guy can't be too bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Take a look at the Clark forum. I think it's still up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noahmijo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. speaking as someone who is pushing for Clark in 08
I don't give a hoot what you think. I think he's the man for the job. But hey if whoever you're pushing happens to get more votes and is a true progressive than I'll back him/her like a favorite horse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I have nothing against him at all.
Edited on Sat Jun-18-05 09:52 PM by undeterred
But having only been around DU for a month or two, its hard for me to understand why there are so many posts and discussions about him right now.

:shrug:

I have no opinion on '08. Well, maybe I'm leaning a little towards Feingold but that's because he's my Senator and I know more about him.

I can't understand why people spend so much time discussing Hillary either, although I suspect its because the Right won't stop talking about her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. You'd understand if you'd been lurking during the campaign from mid-2003
Clark has a lot of supporters here. So does Kerry, Dean, and Kucinich. Personally, I like all of them and try not to bad mouth any of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. I give a hoot for Clark ...
Ok .. two hoots and a holler ...

HOOT ! .. HOOT .. HOOEYYYYYYYYYYYY !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I gotta tell you something that I am big on Clark for VP. He's
the perfect candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, Everyone's Different & Have Differing Views!
so you're not a misfit.

Although, I think Clark's a pretty stand up, righteous truthteller.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickgutierrez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm pretty indifferent towards him, to be honest.
(Not posting a further opinion.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. I have to confess that I really didn't pay that much attention to the
primaries. I didn't catch on to Howard Dean or anyone, I just wasn't into it. And I hadn't discovered DU yet. I campaigned for Kerry, but I would have campaigned for whoever the Dem candidate was. There were things I liked very much about him and things I didn't like. Nobody's perfect.

But more than anything else, I don't think politics should be all about the politicians- it should be all about us. Who is really going to serve all the people of this country. Its not always that easy to tell from a campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:45 PM
Original message
No you're not.
Most us didn't drink that particular brand of kool-aid.

Clark lost big time in the primaries because Democrats overwhelmingly rejected him. He's very transparent. He had absolutely no qualifications for the office of president. He was an unabashed supporter of bush, cheney and the rest of the neo-cons....at least until they made it clear they didn't want him. Then of course his loyalties changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think it's worthless talk unless you work locally for 2006
anything else is fantasy no matter who I want
I do work locally and state wide
get your elections honest, work locally think globally

I stay out of those Clark, Hillary, Warner, Jeb
discussions. A waste of time,
in the time we have left
on what is really important.


I want Chavez for 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhollyHeretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. I don't have anything against Clark
but I'm not particularly enamored with him. I'm new here and was very surprised to see the amount of talk about Clark on this board. Some people get pretty nasty defending him too, I think it's a little early to pick an '08 canidate yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Welcome GreenJ!
:hi:

I'm sure there's a history to some of the discussions here that goes way back...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhollyHeretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. Thanks for the welcome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Hi GreenJ!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
16. Nah youre entitled to that opinion
Personally on Clark, I think he should run for Governor in Arkansas, we do have an opening out there as Huckabee has to retire. I think it would be a great chance for Clark to show what he can do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. That's right! I want to see WC get in the thick of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Seriously though
I want to see how he would do as governor, like I think its reasonable to say that Clark should run for the opening there, and Arkansas isnt a bright red state either, its always been one of the more liberal states in the south.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Same here. Also as a side note ..........
Edited on Sat Jun-18-05 10:25 PM by Crazy Guggenheim
More than a few Demos don't quite "trust him" yet. I think that he could realy show his stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Well apparently theres already a defacto dem candidate there
and I know they have two dem senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Sorry, John, but Arkansas's next governor is gonna be Mike Beebe
He's the heir apparent, the current state Attorney General and a really good candidate.

Both senate seats are in the hands of young, ambitious Democrats. If Wes Clark wants an electoral future he has no choice-it the presidency or nothing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Oh my apologies
I didnt know that, he has every right to run for the presidency though, it would be nice if he could build up his political resume though, no offense intended to him what so ever, I just want to see what the man is capable of doing once in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Someone new like Clark would shake up the Democratic
establishment. We need the change right away!! And Clark is the man for it at the time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. Arkansas politics has always been very hierarchical and the state
attorney general has been a typical stepping stone for Democrats running for governor. Clinton followed this path, as did Jim Guy Tucker and at least one other Arkansas attorney general whose name totally escapes me right now.

I thought the 2002 nominee, Jimmie Lou Fisher might run but she declined. As it stands, the Democratic field has been cleared for Beebe. Republicans have a very contentious primary. Asa Hutchison, former Bush drug czar and brother of the fundy Arkansas senator Hutchinson who Mark Pryor beat in 2004, is running as is Lt Gov Winthrop Rockefeller who has more money than God.

Clark certainly could run for governor against Beebe, split the party for his own political advantage, force Beebe to spend all his cash in a primary and probably win. But the Arkansas Democratic party is ailing right now and a fierce party primary is the last thing they need. It would be counter-productive to say the least.

To be a governor is to be an administrator, a delegater, a manager. Thats exactly the same thing a commanding general does. There is a necessity to think strategically, plan pro-actively, delegate carefully, build morale and maintain basic societal norms (food/clothing/housing/schools). General Clark has spent much of his career doing just that.

When Dwight Eisenhower retired from the military he moved directly to the White House. No one felt it necessary for him to run the state government of Kansas to prove that he was competent to be president. His military resume proved he was competent to be president. In my opinion, Wes Clark has earned the same respect.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. We don't need no stinking rules.
Keep Clark occupied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Well I obviously didnt know that but thank you
I dont know Arkansas politics well enough to understand. I just want to see what Clark is capable of doing as a politican like what kind of programs etc he will support. I didnt know about Beebe and youre right it would be a mistake. I just want to see what Clark can do as a politican before I can support him running for the white house in a primary now if hes the nominee, hes got my support, hes a fine guy but he needs to establish himself, just my personal preference, I would have felt hte same about Eisenhower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Here's a good article on the race from Thursday's Ark Democrat Gazette
http://nwanews.com/story.php?paper=bcdr§ion=News&storyid=21768

I started following Arkansas politics in 1972/73 when I entered college next door in Mississippi. Gov Dale Bumpers beat J William Fullbright (one of my hero's) for a senate seat in 1974 and Bill Clinton lost his first political race for congress that year. That was the Watergate/Nixon pardon election when Democrats won almost every race being contested. It was awesome-one of the greatest nights of my life.

Arkansas is a fascinating state with an really intriguing political history (would make a wonderful master's dissertation).

I'm not shilling for Clark. I respect him and will probably wind up in his camp in 2008. And I understand people like you who want to see a candidate with an elective history and have no problem with that, it just isn't that important to me, considering his overall career.

I expect 2008 to be like 2004, 1992, 1988, 1984 and 1976. There will be 8-12 Democratic candidates, almost all of whom I could happily (or at least willingly) vote for. When the time comes, I'll vote for whoever the party nominates because the alternative is just too horrible to imagine. I imagine you will too.

Regardless, we've gotta get through 2006 before 2008 really becomes relevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Thanks
and thanks for understanding where I am coming from. Oh and 2005 not 2006 ha, just teasing ya man, just we here in virginia have a governor's race which is going to be my first race. I realize you're not shilling, understand whats going on, in fact when I mentioned that Arkansas's two senators were more moderate, someone took that to mean they were DINOs and Clark should run against them which I thought was absurd for the same reasons it seems it would be for him to run against this current AG. Yes, Arkansas is interesting politically, the state I study most politically though has to be the state of Pennyslvania.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Pennsylvania makes Arkansas look NORMAL!
What an incredibly strange place politically. Often I've found myself liking their Republicans abbout as much as their Dems. I actually saw Governor Milton Shapp speak in Atlanta during his brief presidential run in 1976.

I had a hard time disliking John Heinz-he was a Republican but definitely not a Trent Lott/Bill Frist rethug. I really liked Senator Harris Wofford but former Gov Bob Casey (who appointed Wofford) irritated me to no end frequently. Don't even get me started on the various mayors of Philadelphia! Frank Rizzo was a Democrat and the worlds largest asshole simultaneously!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. Thats what I mean
Yeah Heinz was a good man and back then really the parties were much more diverse. Oh yes Casey was pro life and more conservative on guns as well. The thing about Pennsylvania though is you'll have some republicans from like the Philly area who are liberals on the social issues but more like your average republican economically but if you go to where my family is from you get some democrats who are conservative on social issues but very new deal like on economics. Its a funny state. I originally read that Rizzo was a republican but recently read he was a dem, I first learned about him from the Jerky boys of places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. Here's a link that will explain the bizarre story of Rizzo's party....
He was a Republican at heart who ran as a Democrat because it was expedient. After 2 terms he launched a drive to overturn the "two consecutive term limit" in Philadelphia. It lost 85%-15%.

4 years later he ran against Wilson Goode as a Democrat, then, 4 years later, he ran against Goode as a Republican. Republican, Democrat, Republicrat, Demopublican, Frank Rizzo was first and foremost a loud-mouthed, bigoted, right-wing asshole.

For detail, google "Frank Rizzo Republican" and read the first link. I tried to post to the article but it won't let me.

He was a really nasty, overly ambitious, cheaply conniving man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyDarthBrodie Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
26. If the primaries still mattered when they got to me
I would have voted for General Clark. Does the "General" part bother me, not so much. It seems to me like he has a level head about when using force is, unfortunately, necessary. I believe I heard him say no one wants war less than a soldier because they are the ones who have to fight it. Although that might not always be the case it seems to me that that is his opinion.I agree with his stance on guns, if you want a semi-automatic join the army you can use them all you want. His tax plan is what won me over to him.

In the primaries I would have taken any of the Dems except Lieberman with Dean, Kucinich and Kerry not far behind Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
28. He's a good guy, but so is Kerry, Dean, Kucinich, etc.
I don't see why the rest of DU seems to think that if you like one of those guys, you can't like the others. Really fucking odd, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Bravo!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
32. You're not a misfit and you are not alone.
Some of his partisans have even targeted and used concerted group efforts to get DUers deemed "anti-Clark" banned.
http://chat.forclark.com/comments/2005/4/10/15343/7983/233#233
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Corey_Baker08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
40. I Really Dont Give a shit about Clark
I wish him the best if he runs but I wont be supporting him in the primaries. All of this DU talk of Clark I believe is completly overblown.

Just hearing about him so much on DU makes me dislike him all the more, he seems to eager to please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Floogeldy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #40
44. With which specific issues are you concerned?
B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Floogeldy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
42. I feel fairly confident that he gives a hoot about you.
B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. How the heck would you know? Have you talked to him and he
mentione undetered?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
45. Wow, I started a political thread in the Lounge.
I didn't mean to. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC