Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tom Cruise & Katie Holmes - Whats your take on this?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 10:41 PM
Original message
Poll question: Tom Cruise & Katie Holmes - Whats your take on this?
Edited on Fri Jun-17-05 10:50 PM by LibraLiz1973
True love? Insanity? Tom's plan to lure her into Scientology?







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think he has taken it too far & has in fact gone looney toons


Someone around here posted this site the other day- it cracked me up

http://www.freekatie.net/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why do people care about this????
Besides boredom of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I admit it- just boredom
It's not that anyone CARES- its just something silly to talk about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Other: Methinks the man doth protest too much.
If they make it to the altar, she'll be his cover wife. And God help her, if she bears him a child and develops postpartum depression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. BINGO!!
Warning Katie: You will not be allowed to seek treatment for post partum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. The first photo looks like a fake 'Hollywood' kiss ?
...she's way to high on his face.

I'm bored too :p
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maveric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. I couldnt give a shit about these 2 priviliged, marginally talented AH's.
There are much more pressing news stories that are being hidden behind this blanket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiviaOlivia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's all about the money.
06/18/2005 4:50 AM
Wired section

~snip~

Two Tom Cruise items have just broken that are going to enrage certain parties. Radar Online is reporting that Cruise made repeated calls and made certain overtures to Scarlett Johansson "weeks" before he began his relationship with Katie Holmes. (Johansson was reported by Upcoming Movies as being firm to costar with Cruise in Mission: Impossible 3 in July '04.) The item, which quotes Johansson directly and says her publicist didn't respond to calls or e-mails seeking confirmation, claims Johansson not only declined Cruise's offer of a Scientology-fortified relationship, but that Cruise then made similar relationship pitches to Kate Bosworth (22) and Lindsay Lohan (18) "before settling on the 26-year-old Holmes." The other item is from N.Y. Daily News gossip columnist Ben Widdicombe(i.e., "Gatecrasher"), and it says the following: "So here's what I'm hearing about that relationship. A source VERY close to the deal is saying there's a contract. It's worth $5 million. It's for five years. There will be no sex. The deal was sealed June 7. That's what I'm hearing." Hold on...only $5 million for five years? If I were repping Katie I would insist on at least $2.5 million per year (more?) with all kinds of extras and stock options and you-name-it.

~snip~

http://hollywood-elsewhere.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. here's the radaronline.com post on this
06172005
Cruise Encounters of the Third kind
GET JOHANS OFF ME

Katie Holmes may have fallen for it, but Tom Cruise’s sci-fi seduction technique scared the bejeezus out of Scarlett Johansson, a source close to the actress says. Weeks before he began wooing his brainwashed bride-to-be, Cruise made repeated phone calls to the 19-year-old starlet—who was then set to co-star with him in Mission Impossible III—imploring her to meet him at the Scientology Celebrity Center in L.A. But when the actress finally agreed, the supposedly professional get-together took an oddly spiritual turn. “ took me into this room, which was stifling hot, and was showing me all kinds of info about joining the church,” Johansson told our source. “The whole time he didn’t even offer me a cookie!” Instead, he offered her dinner—and a glimpse into the Twilight Zone.

After two hours of proselytizing, our source says Cruise opened a door to reveal a second room full of upper-level Scientologists who had been waiting to dine with the pair, at which point the cool-headed ingenue politely excused herself. Soon after the meeting, Johansson dropped out of Mission Impossible III, reportedly due to scheduling conflicts. Asked about the incident, Johansson’s momager, Melanie Johansson, referred Radar to a publicist, who did not return calls or emails seeking comment. After striking out with Johansson, Cruise reportedly turned his attentions to 24-year-old Jessica Alba, 22-year-old Kate Bosworth, and 18-year-old Lindsay Lohan, before settling on the 26-year-old Holmes. As far we know, Cruise’s War of the Worlds co-star, Dakota Fanning, was never under consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. We got all happy when
Jen and Brad got together--and look what happened to them. Tom and Katie are just another Hollywood phase. Doomed!!:boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. Other: I misread that as "Tom Hanks and Katie Couric"
You think I'm kidding, but I really thought that's what it said when I clicked on the link.
And I was like, "Isn't he already married?" You can see she's got "first love" written all over
her face. He's got "I've still got it" written all over his.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. roflmao
:yourock:


sadly I bet they would be a good couple
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC