Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Texas Girl With Cancer Taken From Parents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
TXlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:47 PM
Original message
Texas Girl With Cancer Taken From Parents
CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas -- Child welfare officials seized a 12-year-old cancer patient from her parents, saying they were blocking radiation treatment that doctors say she needs.

During a court hearing Wednesday, Michele and Edward Wernecke asked juvenile court Judge Carl Lewis to bar doctors from providing radiation therapy for daughter Katie, who is now in a Houston hospital, until a hearing next week to determine whether she will stay in state custody.


More...


I think this is wrong.

If well-respected doctors are unanimously in agreement about what treatment needs to be done, and parents refuse treatment to their child, then the state should be able to intervene on the child's behalf.

But if there is legitimate difference of opinion, if well-respected doctors in the relevant field differ on course (or necessity) of treatment, then I believe the decision should rest solely with the parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm torn on this...
I can see where the law exists, because children being allowed to die of treatable diseases like diabetes (a la Christian scientists) makes me quite upset. But I don't think the government needs to be stepping in in *every* case... tough call, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Except that radiation is pretty much
Edited on Thu Jun-09-05 01:58 PM by supernova
accepted standard cancer care right now.

I don't understand what the parents are thinking here. :wtf:

Unless she's dying, which it doesn't appear so, I don't understand why you would refuse treament. Or just say "no thanks, I'll go try homeopthy or somehting." Doesn't make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. The kid does not want the radiation
I just saw a tape of her on TV. She feels fine, her hair is growing back, thus all MUST be well. She and her parents are singing from the same sheet of music, apparently.

Of course, she could be sick as a dog in a year and on her way out the door if she doesn't get the treatment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Exactly
Of course, she could be sick as a dog in a year and on her way out the door if she doesn't get the treatment.

This tells me they don't know enough about her disease
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. with underaged kids, the state has an abiding interest to protect them.
if the child were adult and said no, then fine. She has no say that is informed over whether she lives or dies. I have no problem with this. It amazes me, after thirty years of teaching, how dimwitted some parents can be. I would hate to think she has parents who are dimwitted. Do the treatment. If she lives, bravo. If she dies, she had a chance larger than her own parents wanted to give her. I err on the side of hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. So, if a 13 yr old girl was raped and got preggers and the parents want
her to get an abortion but the fuckers in TX want her to have it because they think it is safer then they can take her a way from her parents?

I don't think fuckin so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. If she were an African American infant without insurance...
...well, we all know what would happen then, don't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I believe they'd be ordering flowers for the funeral right now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. No applicable...
That is not a health decision...nor a matter of life and death!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. CHURCH OF GOD members
They aren't real fans of medicine on a good day. Not as bad as some, but not as enthused as your average individual either.

I don't think the state particularly wanted this case, but they got it because a doctor (or doctors) complained.

I think that is the issue--the parents don't want the radiation or chemo therapy, and the doctors are disagreeing.

The judge isn't going off the hook, though--he's getting a third opinion before anything is done. I think they are doing a scan of the kid to see what is what before they proceed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. None of the doctors mentioned disagree on the course of treatment.
The doctors "at home" recommended radiation therapy. The doctors at M D Anderson are still reviewing her case & will recommend the same if they think it's needed.

Hodgkin's Disease is one of the most treatable malignancies. But it DOES need to be treated correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithlet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't know enough about this particular case
to form an opinion, but I do think the state has the right to step in if parents refuse life saving medical treatment for their children. If it is clear that this girl needs the treatment to survive, and the parents refuse it, then the state should step in and force the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. OK, no offense but how come all this weird shit seems to happen in
Texas and Florida?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. It looks like the med staff just can't communicate w/ the parents
and the child's health is a bargaining chip.

Further down in the article:

... But the couple's attorney, Daniel Horne, said religion wasn't at issue in the fight over cancer treatment.

Rather, they believe doctors haven't been upfront about Katie's care and have not answered all their questions about the side effects of the radiation.

"This issue is about parental rights, not about religious rights," Horne said. "They just want to be informed of her treatment. They want to be involved in this."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. I side with the parents
It's their daughter, their family and their decision. A lot of "medical professionals" have fucked up. I don't trust medicine either, and that is my decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
15. It think it's a quality of life issue......
The child can receive life-extending treatments that will require her to stay in the hospital, treatments that may make her feel deathly ill for several hours or days afterward.......

Or the child can go home with Mom and Dad and enjoy what time they have left being a family and spending quality time together.

I think everyone will be faced with this predicament at least once, eventually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Hodgkin's Disease is highly treatable.
Quite often, it is NOT fatal. We aren't talking about an 89 year old with metastatic melanoma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. This isn't about extending her life, this is about saving it
Hodgkins Disease is quite treatable, but you have to hit it early and hard. A chemo/rad treatment plan is pretty damn standard, and while that 1-2 punch is hard on a person, but it can be survived. And once you are done, you are good to go for life.

If you don't jump on this now though, there is a very good chance that you will die. I come down on the side of the state on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
19. Save the child, execute the parents.
:shrug: Hey, what can I say? I'm from Texas AND I was raised in cult that similarly tried to kill children, I'm a bit edgy about this sort of stuff, but when in doubt, execute somebody!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC