Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which World War II General was the biggest asshole?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:45 PM
Original message
Poll question: Which World War II General was the biggest asshole?
This is a tough one - Patton famously berated shellshocked men as cowards, Montgomery had an extraordinary ego that lended itself to massive arrogance and MacArthur was more concerned about his own myth than anything else. Of course, to make things worse, all three were great generals.
As a wildcard, I'd add Clark, who was even more of a publicity whore than MacArthur, a man would rather be photographed taking Rome than capturing an enemy army.
What do you lot reckon? I think I'll vote for MacArthur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think Patton...
Probably because he just continued being an asshole long after it was required of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. He was brilliant, but apparently in real life he had a high squeaky voice.
For some reason, I find that hilarious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yeah Ive heard that
about him. George C Scott as him will forever be in my mind though. I say McArthur too honestly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. I think you are confusing him with someone else, he died
within a week of the end of the war.

His assholishness drove an army which delivered a decisive blow not once, but three times (africa, italy and belgium) and had previously completely re-written the armored war plans for the US army.

It was completely, from a military point of view, justified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. It was probably Patton
Edited on Wed Mar-30-05 09:55 PM by Maestro
however, I voted for MacArthur. Patton still had some sort of transcendental aire about him. Yeah, he was a nut, but his troops, (most of them) loved him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. General Dick "Crustypants" Savage.
Terror of the Teutons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Clark
His Rome escapade prolonged the Italian campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. True enough.
There's a story that the Fifth Army had to clear central Rome by no later than 4pm on June 4th 1944 so the General could get his photo taken in time for the next press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. I actually would choose Soviet Colonel - General Lev Mekhlis
"Stalin's iron hand." Also at several points during the 1930s was the chief editor of Pravda. Mastered the art of terrorizing, arresting, and executing his own troops. Truly one of the most horrific people ever to exist.



Of the listed, I would go with MacArthur, for obvious reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Oh , you.
Edited on Wed Mar-30-05 09:55 PM by Wat_Tyler
Everybody knows Tuchachevsky was the real bad boy of the Kremlin set.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. What about that one soviet general who went benedict arnold?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Vlasov.
He sounds more easily taken in than anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. Probably accounts for his death before the start of the war.
:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Apparently the Germans framed him because he was the best Soviet general.
They planted information that he was conspiring with Hitler, and Stalin purged him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. Yes
Another brilliant maneuver by Koba. :eyes: Stalin probably could have gotten more accomplished if he had refrained from shooting himself in the foot constantly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. probably could throw in a Nazi or two as well
Edited on Wed Mar-30-05 09:56 PM by imenja
to round out the pack.

Mekhlis sounds horrifying. The depths of inhumanity men can sink do defy comprehension.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. I have to go with Montgomery.
He seems to have been an insufferable prick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. How can people not pick MacArthur?
He wanted to nuke China off the face of the map. :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I did
for that and how he wanted to handle Korea and as a result, I admire Harry Truman for firing him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Patton had similar ideas about the USSR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Did he insist on nuking them? And don't forget Le May
I hadn't heard that. Truman had to fire MacArthur because he refused to relent from his diabolical scheme.

Another major asshole was Curtis Le May. If had been up to him, we'd all have been wiped out in the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Patton did want to invade Yugoslavia to sort out Tito.
Imagine Bosnia fifty years early.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. sorry, I still have to go with MacArthur
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Why not, I did.
And Patton was at least an excellent general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Thats a reason for me not to like Patton
I had family there then as I do now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. So did Stalin
But he chose the path of espionage and assasination. Tito sent a letter to Stalin in 1950 that read: "Stop sending assasins to murder me....if this doesn't stop, I will send a man to Moscow and there'll be no need to send any more."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Tito had guts
Awesome quote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. He certainly did
One of my heroes honestly. He kept a hotspot united for 35 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Yep I read that in my biography of Tito I had
He was afraid really of what Tito planned to do there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. Tito was practically indestructible.
After all, he survived four years of having the Nazis chase him across the Balkans - he was ruthless, cunning and smart as hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #37
50. Tito told Stalin to take a flying leap after the war
and Stalin didn't do anything about it.

I have a friend from Macedonia and she told me her country was a lot better off under Tito.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. My grandfather's family is Slovenian
and they too saw an improvement. I think his relatives were actually partisans, not sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. Patton figured now or later, so let's do it while we have the troops there
Good general, but crazy as fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. well, he had a point there
Would have spared us the agony of the Cold War. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. I think as a general rule good soldiers make bad politicians. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. God, what a competition... all of them, and more
How about LeMay, he made General towards the end of the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yeah, people tend to forget him.
I know I have. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
54. Want to hear something to make you go.... AH HA!... ?
There was a certain Lt Col who worked under him during WWII, bright fellow, trasferred straight from Harvard to the US Army Air Corps. Worked for him in plans and strategy...





His name?







Robert McNamara



Hmmmmmmmm, Ah HA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSandman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. Other , if you meant Clark...
At least the other three were able to show something besides stack up casualties.

By acting like prima donnas, the other three used that persona to inspire their troops to a belief in victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. It did work for all three.
As far as Montgomery goes, he was a cheerleader as much as anything, and he knew it. The man was a brilliant trainer and motivator - and that is half the job of Generalship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. Montgomery...
arrogant bastard, and his military abilities are less redeeming than those of any of the others. He was the architect of the massive fuckup at Arnhem, for instance, that resulted in the capture of two divisions. He's only considered "great" because of the African campaign, and even there the defeat was more Rommel's than the victory Monty's, thanks to the overextension of German supply lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
39. Reinhard Heydrich


Came up with "The Final Solution"
Can't be a bigger asshole than that, can you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Does Heydrich count as a general?
I had him down as a politician, myself. Mind you, Himmler 'commanded' an Army Group towards the end, and they don't come any jerkier than old Heinrich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #42
51. Technically he was a policeman
but under the system prior to and during the Nazi regime, that was a military service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #42
55. Yes, he was an SS Brigadier General.
Granted, that's like being named "Hero of the Murkan Empire" by Shrubby, but a General he was. He was an Oberguppenfuhrer at the time he was "fixed"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
40. Subthread - which World War II General was the most incompetent?
Nominee #1.

Australian General Gordon Bennett - so useless the phrase 'Gordon Bennett!' as an exasperated cry entered the British and Australian lexicon - a man so rubbish he practically singlehandedly lost Singapore to a numerically inferior Japanese force, then pissed off back to Australia at the last minute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Another vote for Monty.
See my earlier reply for part of the reason why...he is, without question, one of the most consistently overrated military commanders in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. But he wasn't as incompetent as his direct predecessor in the 8th Army
General Neil Ritchie - utterly useless with no redeeming qualities whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Auchinleck might deserve credit for even greater incompetence.
After all, he appointed Ritchie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. True.
Although, Auchinleck did at least win one battle - First Alamein, albeit against an exhausted Panzerarmee Afrika. Ritchie's predecessor, Cunningham, was equally dismal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pres2032 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
41. MacArthur was considered a god by the Japanese
that has to count for something. Not to mention he was a damned good general, as was Patton. I'm going with Montgomery for being an arrogant little prick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CubsFan1982 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
47. MacArthur
For thinking he was above the President of the United States. I'm sorry, but the douchebag couldn't hold Harry Truman's jock as far as I'm concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
48. Tough choices. Patton probably required the most baby-sitting.
So he was maybe the highest-maintenence of the lot. Although MacArthur and Truman went toe-to-toe more than once. I just keep remembering what war-cartoonist/writer Bill Mauldin wrote about Patton, and it *wasn't* flattering.

I'm stuck between these two admittedly great assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
49. How could I forget France's asshole of the Century - Charles de Gaulle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
53. Monty. Absopositivilutely the biggest asshole of the entire war
Ego and stupidity in equal measures.

How do the Brits breed them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
56. Montgomery: because he was an asshole AFTER World War II
In Great Britain in 1955, the Wolfenden Committee was formed...to look into the idea of decriminalizing homosexual acts between consenting adults. At the time, homosexuality was very much a criminal offense in Britain.

The Wolfenden Committee, after hearings and debate, in 1957 issued its report recommending essentially decriminalizing homosexuality. During debate in Parliment, Montgomery...now Lord Montgomery...fought this every step of the way...calling homosexuality "vile" and saying at one point during the debate "if we do this, we might as well condone the Devil and all of his works". In 1967, 10 years after the Wolfenden Report, the Sexual Offences Act was passed...formally ratifying the reports findings and decriminalizing homosexuality.

http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/wolfenden_report,2.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #56
57. Looks like it's between Monty and MacArthur.
Patton couldn't really help being a jerk, and his early death in December 1945 at least saved us from post-war assholery.
Incidentally, Patton and Montgomery's superior in Africa, Field Marshal Alexander was a later Governor General of Canada, and a very decent individual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
58. Patton, no doubt
He was an asshole of a rare degree, but a damn fine general too. Then again, Montgomery and MacArthur were also major f-in assholes, but damn fine commanders.
I personally consider MacArthur's Island Hopping campaign up New Guinea and the Southwest pacific and through the Phillipines to be the finest Allied campaign of the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. Dougout Doug? He did not think up that campaign, it was forced on
him by the Navy and Marine Corps.
He fought it all the way above Marshall's head to Stimson, who told him to do what he was told.

Mere words cannot describe how assholish he was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC