Backless Panties Newest Rage!

[NomoBreaks]

Montreal, Quebec (PRWEB) March 22, 2005 -- They’re sexy, they’re fashionable, and they provide the solution to a common dilemma facing fashionable women everywhere: Backless Lingerie. A revolution in women’s underwear, Backless Lingerie enable any woman to wear the lowest cut jeans or the sheerest gowns without ever showing a telltale panty line or thong.

Backless Lingerie have been a runaway success since they hit the market in early February 2005. Mere weeks since the www.BacklessLingerie.com retail website launched, these unique panties are flying off the shelf. Online orders are increasing every day -- a testament to the patented design that enables women to wear any style with complete confidence.

Comfy and sexy in equal measure, Backless Lingerie are a classy alternative to a thong or g-string. This revolutionary new design features adjustable leg bands that sit snugly beneath your buttocks, holding Backless Lingerie in place. No matter what you wear, Backless Lingerie remain comfortable and discrete; but unlike thongs, they never ride, shift or wedge.

“We were very pleased with how quickly sales picked up once the Backless Lingerie retail website went live,” said Matthew James, CEO of the Backless Brief Company. “It goes to show that a good product speaks for itself. With Backless Lingerie, not only do we offer a solution to a common fashion dilemma, but we offer a solution that has style and panache. The result is a popular product that fashionable women need and enjoy.”

About Backless Lingerie Designed by a woman, Backless Lingerie (www.BacklessLingerie.com) is a patented and trademarked undergarment, enabling fashionable women to dress with style, comfort and confidence. The revolutionary, adjustable design of Backless Lingerie ensures that anyone can wear the lowest cut jeans and the sheerest gowns, without ever worrying about revealing panty lines and thongs.

My advice: Don't wear white the day after eating Tex-Mex:nuke:

[madeline_con]

1. why don't they

just not wear panties? DUH.

[RagingInMiami]

2. you have to leave something to the imagination for us guys

[gardenista]

23. Yeah, but how would you *really* be sure? Is she commando or no?

Sounds like a good trademark for those guys.

[Castilleja]

13. That's what I was gonna say

Honestly, they could just simplify things and go without. Save the panty wearing for when it won't stick out. I can't even figure out how they stay up.

[gardenista]

3. Geez, why bother? nt

[Lone Pawn]

4. I want a pair of backless, crotchless, frontless, and sideless panties.

[Richard Steele]

14. One of my favorite pairs of bvd's fit that description...

...eventually.

Took awhile though...

[Fenris]

5. Is it just me, or does this seem like the dumbest idea ever?

:wtf:

[WindRavenX]

6. no, it is

And it looks uncomfortable.

[Fenris]

10. Extremely

Oy. The things some people will do in the name of fashion. x(

[SemiCharmedQuark]

9. Eh, I don't think it's that bad.

I'm getting sick of seeing my classmates' thongs all the time.

[Fenris]

11. Thongs don't bother me.

I'm just glad they're wearing underwear. With this "invention"...who really knows? :shrug:

[SemiCharmedQuark]

19. I'm not bothered as long as buttcheeks aren't directly touching the chair.

That happened once. The girl's pants were literally halfway down her butt.

[gardenista]

24. Of course not! Lara Croft wears 'em, so I will, too!

[tuvor]

7. Can't you just pull your panties down on the backside?

Looks like the same thing to me.

(I never thought I'd ever post those words in that order during my lifetime.)

[mike_c]

8. since legs taper from the top down...

...wouldn't these have a real tendency to slide down, or to continually shift lower and not to return? I don't suppose that would be a real problem under pants, but under a backless gown wouldn't you have to constantly hitch them back up?

[barackmyworld]

12. so your ass will hang out instead of a thong

it's the PANTS that are the problem! I think seeing thong is better than crack.

[SemiCharmedQuark]

20. Bwahahahaha!

[tammywammy]

21. Agreed, the pants are the problem

It's hard to find jeans that aren't ultra low cut and super low cut. I just want some that aren't up to my belly button, but not where half my ass hangs out. Don't they realize not everyone wants to wear that.

And, I don't see how those panties even stay up.

[NomoBreaks]

26. I cant speak for all but

I kinda like when the lil rear waistband pops out and we can see the color of your panties, and also whether you wear Victoria's Secret or Walmart cheepies. :)

[Warren DeMontague]

15. Not in this country.

Here's this year's Erotic Attire, brought to you by your Bushco. ministry of vice and virtue:

[davsand]

16. Real women would just staple on a mini-pad.

Hell with that elastic stuff that just slips off--NAIL those little thingies on! It sure eliminates that visible pantie line.


Laura

[gardenista]

22. Ow! How about a velcro compromise?

[davsand]

25. Duct Tape will fix it!!!!!

You can do ANYTHING with Duct Tape!!!!


Laura

[gardenista]

28. Yeah, and you could even skip the wax that week! OOOOWWWWWW

[NomoBreaks]

27. If I understand the velcro theory...

..one side would be the smooth side and the other would be....extremely uncomfortable to remove, no?

[gardenista]

29. Yep. But less painful than staples! Anyting for beauty!

[TahitiNut]

17. It's the wedgie defense.

:silly:

[Tom Kitten]

18. I don't quite get it...

Really I don't...

[Historic NY]

30. They look like jockstraps..........well sort of...........n/t