Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you still think Michael Jackson is guilty?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
skjpm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:26 PM
Original message
Do you still think Michael Jackson is guilty?
After today's testimony, I'm about ready to do my "I told you so" dance for those who think he's guilty. A master of poor judgment, yes, but molester, no. Frankly, I don't even understand most of the charges. He's certainly not the first adult to offer a kid a taste of his wine. He's also not the first adult to find a kid looking at porn and then look at it himself. It's not a great thing, but those things happen. He's also not the first to make inappropriate jokes--any kid who's seen an Austin Powers movie has seen worse things than what Jackson is accused of.

As to the molestation--OK, if it's true, it's bad. But why didn't the alarm go off and wake the kid? How did he see into a shadowy room? And why did he change his story?

I think people want to think Jackson is guilty because he's wierd. Frankly, I'm glad when someone has the courage to be wierd. He looks like Bowie during his Aladdin Sane period, and that's a good thing. That doesn't mean he's a pervert.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CalebHayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think he is Innocent until proven guilty by a jury of his peers.
I'm not on the Jury and therefor, I don't feel it's my place to judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. call me sick, I never thought he was guilty. I thought those people
were a family of gold-diggers and those cops were so sexually frustrated that they took it out on MJ. This was an extreme witch hunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Couldn't care less. Nor could I care less about Martha Stewart...
...Paris Hilton, or any other fucking worthless celebrity whose personal problems dominate the so-called "news" shows. I say fuck 'em all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livinginphotographs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Who?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think I don't care ... n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skjpm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That's why I posted this in the Lounge
It's not an earth-shattering topic, and my life won't change either way. Other guys talk sports, I talk celebrity gossip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Fair enough ...
I've just managed not to notice a single thing about this in any newspaper or on television. (Hey, I'd make a great juror. :-))

It was somewhat discomfitting to see it assault my eyes on DU.

But, I won't rant or deny you your gossip. It's certainly as interesting as arguing about who'll survive March Madness. Just expressing my opinion of it is all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeyManThatsCool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. Probably not in THIS case
But do I think something happened in 94 that caused him to fork over 20 million dollars? Uh, yeah.

Not sure if the 94 case was ACTUAL molestation or just a bunch of really off color crap.

I hope to hell he didnt molest anyone- but reguardless, I also hope this teaches him a lesson about the difference between right & wrong. IMH) it is INSANE that he keeps having these children sleep in his bed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skjpm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Is that a cultural thing, though?
It sounds creepy, but I asked my Mom, and in her day kids and adults shared beds. And I think it's pretty common in other cultures. I suspect it's with family, but probably with extended family as well--I'm sure groups of immigrants, who are a mix of relations and friends, share beds. Jackson grew up in a tiny house sharing one room with five brothers. I suspect he doesn't see it as all that abnormal.

I think it's time he learned, but I'm not sure it means anything other than he grew up in a wierd way himself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Puluheeze! He is a sicko creep.
Just listen to him talk about how "charming it is" and how "natural"! And he doesn't just like children either .He only likes little boys! What is up with that? More of an argument could be made if it was about just children but restricting it to a gender says something. Most pedaphiles are straight but in his case, I have to wonder. What ever he is, he isn't "normal and I have a really broad definition of so called "normal. Middle aged blackmen who have plastic surgery to become a cross between a mummy and a young white womn are odd.
My mother also grew up in a family that shared beds and none of them did it after they grew up. It isn't as if Micheal were pressed for space in Neverland!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeyManThatsCool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. I think that after the first time he had to pay over 20 million dollars
he should have known FOREVER that it was a mistake.


Also- his behavior in that documentary when he had "Blanket" on his lap was INSANE.. Seriously. Nuts.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. yeah
I think he's guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fleabert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
12. I am inclined to think he is, but will reserve judgement.
Edited on Wed Mar-09-05 04:40 AM by fleabert
just cause the family is messed up, doesn't mean he's not. If she had just gone for money, I'd suspect the mom was to blame, but this is a criminal suit. it could have been handled the same way the 94 case was. I think it's bullshit the parents let the kids spend the night there anyway after what happened in 94.

I am a big supporter of the family bed, it's healthy and very normal in lots of cultures, more popular here than many are willing to admit. I don't plan on getting my kids a crib, they will get a big kid bed when they are ready...but...non family members, over the age of 10? unusual. could it have been innocent? yes, but I doubt it.

I think he will be found innocent because of reasonable doubt.

my opinion is only based on what i know, and that isn't much about this case. I could be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 04:43 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. yup
it's all opinion. But it's OK to discuss it.

If the mother in the case were after money, I'm sure she could've gotten it. I doubt Jackson wouldn't have tried to settle such a thing. Even if his financial situation IS precarious, as has been reported, he could sell Neverland itself and pay her off - it beats a long prison sentence, which he might not survive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fleabert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 04:56 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I know someone who used to work at Neverland. He said it was weird.
Kids there all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. oh, I'm sure there are...
I also want to add that I honestly think Michael Jackson doesn't believe he's done anything wrong. During the interview with Bashir, he kept saying "I would never hurt a child". He's indulged himself, or been so indulged, that (imo) he doesn't relate to kids like a normal adult. I think he has managed to convince himself he's an adolescent boy himself, and may well consider what he does normal experimentation.

But I think it's very likely he has a sexual attraction to adolescent boys. In fact, I'd call it a compulsion - after the last time he was accused of this, somebody without such a compulsion would've been much more careful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LadyLeo Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. After the last fiasco...
I honestly believe that any parent who would allow her child, to stay overnight should be just as responsible (guilty) as MJ. I think it is all a money scheme.

After the first lawsuit, just the HINT that he MIGHT have done that would have stopped me from EVER letting my child go there. Especially unattended, especially overnight. What are the parents thinking? Why would someone trade their childs innocence for the chance of a big payday. That is exactly what I see when I look at this case.

I would rather live dirt poor in a trailer park, work my ass off at McDonalds for 5.75 an hour (or whatever min. wage is now) than trade one of my childrens innocence for a life of luxury. Just not worth it and I think the parents should be on trial right along with him. The kids should be taken away from them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I agree, the parents have some serious explaining to do.
It's not as if they could be ignorant of the charges.

At this point, I don't even think it matters whether Jackson is innocent or guilty (for now, innocent). The kids have been seriously messed up at least twice, and probably three times.

Possibly by Jackson, probably by the parents, and certainly by the court system. Exploitation of children is bad enough once, but three times?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmkramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. IMHO
I doubt if he'll be convicted of the "kidnapping" and/or "false imprisonment" charges. I think the actual molestation charges will depend on how believable the accuser is and on the testimony of the "nonfamily" witnesses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
20. He's a fucking stupid cultural icon---hang him by his balls
and you too for giving a rats fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. You're soooo cool
Edited on Wed Mar-09-05 11:40 PM by demwing
The way your mind works! I'm very impressed. You're wit cuts like a Wilkinson blade, and your ability to turn a phrase is...well, to say you are merely "poetic" would be a great disservice. Even in death, Robert Frost is humbled by your presense.

Can I be you?

Just for a day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. I never thought he was. I think he never got the chance for a normal
childhood...hence the strange adulthood. I think it's pretty sick how blood thirsty we get. Those who know him say he is a wonderful father and loyal friend. Why isn't Emmanuel Lewis or that Alphonse kid also trying to cash in on this is my question. They are not exactly rich and famous anymore. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justy387 Donating Member (154 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
23. I am so glad I'm not alone in my support for MJ. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC