Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An essay on "Why The Liberals are Wrong"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 08:51 AM
Original message
An essay on "Why The Liberals are Wrong"
An essay on Why The Liberals are Wrong

The subject of Why The Liberals are Wrong has been covered intensively by the world press over the past decade. Many an afternoon has been enjoyed by a family, bonding over the discussion of Why The Liberals are Wrong. While it is becoming a hot topic for debate, its influence on western cinema has not been given proper recognition. Crossing many cultural barriers it still draws remarks such as 'I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole' and 'i'd rather eat wasps' from global commercial enterprises, who are likely to form a major stronghold in the inevitable battle for hearts and minds. Keeping all of this in mind, in this essay I will examine the major issues.

Social Factors

Interweaving social trends form a strong net in which we are all trapped. When Lance Bandaner said 'twelve times I've traversed the ocean of youthful ambition but society still collects my foot prints' <1> he shead new light on Why The Liberals are Wrong, allowing man to take it by the hand and understand its momentum. Much has been said about the influence of the media on Why The Liberals are Wrong. Observers claim it provides standards by which we may judge our selves.

Some analysts have been tempted to disregard Why The Liberals are Wrong. I haven’t. It breaks the mould, shattering man's misunderstanding of man.

Economic Factors

Is unemployment inherently bad for an economy? Yes. Of course, Why The Liberals are Wrong fits perfectly into the Maiden-Tuesday-Lending model. Taking special care to highlight the role of Why The Liberals are Wrong within the vast framework which this provides.
Oil
Prices

Why The Liberals are Wrong

Indisputably there is a link. How can this be explained? Of course oil prices looms over Why The Liberals are Wrong this cannot be a coincidence. What it all comes down to is money. Capitalists love Why The Liberals are Wrong.

Political Factors

Posturing as concerned patriarchs, many politicians guide the electorate herd to the inevitable cattle shed of 'equal opportunity.' Comparing the general view of politics held by the poor of the west with those of the east can be like comparing chalk and cheese.

Let us consider the words of that silver tongued orator, the famous political Odysseus Shandy 'People in glass houses shouldn't through parties.' <2> Amazingly, he new nothing of Why The Liberals are Wrong until he was well into his thirties. History tells us that Why The Liberals are Wrong will always be a vote winner, whether we like it, or not.
I wait anxiously. What will the next few years bring for Why The Liberals are Wrong?

Conclusion

How much responsibility lies with Why The Liberals are Wrong? We can say that Why The Liberals are Wrong plays a large part in the lives of all. It replenishes the self, puts out 'fires', and is a joy to behold.

I shall give the final word to star Denzel Schwarzenegger: 'I demand Why The Liberals are Wrong, nothing more nothing less.' <3>

<1> Lance Bandaner - Adventurous Spirit - 1993 See-Saw Publishing

<2> Shandy - Ice Cold - 1994 Pitter Patter Publishing

<3> Smashing Hits - Issue 224 - Jazz Media


From:
http://radioworldwide.gospelcom.net/essaygenerator/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. On Susan Sontag
Let us commence a journey into the much travelled topic of Susan Sontag. I find my self constantly drawn back to the subject of Susan Sontag. While it is becoming a hot topic for debate, its influence on western cinema has not been given proper recognition. Inevitably feelings run deep amongst the aristocracy, many of whom fail to comprehend the full scope of Susan Sontag. Keeping all of this in mind, in this essay I will examine the major issues.

Social Factors

As Reflected in classical mythology society is complicated. When Sir Bernard Chivilary said 'hounds will feast on society' <1> he borrowed much from Susan Sontag. While the western world use a knife and fork, the Chinese use chopsticks. Of course Susan Sontag provides standards by which we may judge our selves.

Special care must be taken when analysing such a delicate subject. On the other hand anyone that disagrees with me is an idiot. Just as a dog will return to its own sick, society will return to Susan Sontag, again and again.

Economic Factors

Is unemployment inherently bad for an economy? Yes. We will primarily be focusing on the Custard-Not-Mustard model, as is standard in this case.
Housing
Prices

Susan Sontag

There are a number of reasons which may be attributed to this unquestionable correlation. Clearly housing prices is in financial terms 'holding hands with Susan Sontag.' The economic policy spectrum is seeing a period of unprecedented growth.

Political Factors

Politics, we all agree, is a fact of life. Comparing the general view of politics held by the poor of the west with those of the east can be like comparing the vote of the man in the street with that of one more accustomed to Susan Sontag.

To quote the famous political Achilles B. Adger 'The success of any political system can only truly be assessed once the fat lady has sung.' <2> This quotation leads me to suspect that he was not unaccustomed to Susan Sontag. It speaks volumes. Perhaps the word which sums up the importance of Susan Sontag to politics is 'participation'.
The question which we must each ask ourselves is, will we allow Susan Sontag to win our vote?

Conclusion

We can conclude that the Susan Sontag is both a need and a want. It questions, 'literally' plants seeds for harvest, and is a joy to behold.

I shall give the final word to star Whoopi Poppins: 'I would say without a shadow of a doubt: Susan Sontag ROCKS!!! <3>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. You know what's even better than this "essay generator"...
is Scott Pakin's Complaint Generator:

http://www.pakin.org/complaint/

Try it. It's a riot. I've been using it for years to screw with people's brains.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I just used it five minutes ago to torment my paranoid Republican friend
Edited on Thu Mar-03-05 03:12 PM by IanDB1
I can't wait to see what he says





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Computer-Generated Complaint about Free Republic
Dear Free Republic,


In all my letters, I try harder than anything else to make myself clear. I try to state things as simply and unambiguously as I can, because I find that that's the best way to convince my readers that Free Republic seems to be fond of concocting new ways to fund a vast web of beer-guzzling nymphomaniacs, neocolonialism-oriented authoritarians, and supercilious, out-of-touch card sharks.

Let's get down to business: It has been said that an increasing number of people abhor its contemptible jokes and are looking for alternatives, like the truth.

I, in turn, maintain that it will stop at nothing to infiltrate the media with the express purpose of disseminating disrespectful information. This may sound outrageous, but if it were fiction I would have thought of something more credible.

As it stands, on the issue of anarchism, Free Republic is wrong again. Sure, if its apologists are frightened that it might mold the mind of virtually every citizen -- young or old, rich or poor, simple or sophisticated -- any day now, they have only themselves to blame. But Free Republic shouldn't disguise the complexity of color, the brutality of class, and the importance of religion and sexual identity in the construction and practice of hooliganism.


That would be like asking a question at a news conference and, too angry and passionate to wait for the answer, exiting the auditorium before the response. Both of those actions distort and trivialize the debate surrounding colonialism. Ostensibly, Free Republic does not intend to take a condescending cheap shot at a person that most gloomy flimflammers will never be in a position to condescend to, but in fact, I want to give people more information about Free Republic, help them digest and assimilate and understand that information, and help them draw responsible conclusions from it.

Here's one conclusion I really hope people draw:

Most of you reading this letter have your hearts in the right place. Now follow your hearts with actions.

Free Republic wants to reap a harvest of death. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis. Free Republic offers two principal reasons as to why the federal government should take more and more of our hard-earned money and more and more of our hard-won rights.

It argues that (1) the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points, and (2) it should cause riots in the streets because "it's the right thing to do".

These arguments are invalid for the following reasons: First, its views are not an abstract problem. They have very concrete, immediate, and unpleasant consequences.

For instance, it and I disagree about our civic duties. I suspect that we must do our utmost to convince the government to clamp down hard on Free Republic's bruta fulmina as expeditiously as possible. Free Republic, on the other hand, believes that doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or liberty.

As a practical matter, Free Republic dreams of a time when they'll be free to impact public policy for years to come. That's the way it's planned it, and that's the way it'll happen -- not may happen, but will happen -- if we don't interfere, if we don't lead it out of a dream world and back to hard reality.

It has been said that from the fog and mist of Free Republic's activities rises the leering grimace of stoicism. That makes sense to me. I believe it's true. But it doubtlessly implies that you might have heard the story that Free Republic once agreed to help us focus on the major economic, social, and political forces that provide the setting for the expression of an obstreperous agenda.

No one has located the document in which Free Republic said that. No one has identified when or where Free Republic said that. That's because it never said it.

As you might have suspected, if Free Republic got its way, it'd be able to revile everything in the most obscene terms and drag it into the filth of the basest possible outlook. Brrrr! It sends chills down my spine just thinking about that.

Finally, whatever your thoughts or feelings about Free Republic are, I urge you to help me allay the concerns of the many people who have been harmed by Free Republic.

http://www.pakin.org/complaint?firstname=Free+Republic&pgraphs=3&gender=c

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC