Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My DU pet peeve: Constitutional ignorance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:12 PM
Original message
My DU pet peeve: Constitutional ignorance
Seriously, don't they teach it in high school anymore? Over the years here, I've seen countless questions/comments that indicate the poster has no familiarity with the document that sets up our government. Shouldn't people on a political website be expected to know a little about this?

I've seen people ask or state:

How do we recall a Senator?
Isn't Bob Novak guilty of treason?
Can we recall the President?
Can we have new elections for President if <insert crime> is proved?
Clinton wasn't impeached - they tried, but failed.
I wish my state would term-limit senators.
How do we recall a Supreme Court justice?
Can we run Bill Clinton in '08?
Who becomes President if Bush and Cheney are removed?
We need a law to end the Electoral College.
So-and-so for President/VP, where so-and-so is under 35 years of age.
Bush will cancel the elections.
States X,Y and Z should secede!

I'm sure there are others I've forgotten. Can anybody think of any?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RevolutionaryActs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Can we run Bill Clinton in '08?" LOL
Why yes, yes we can........ :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. They teach government in Virginia
but I hate to sound like a snob, people still dont get shit. One of my most proudest accomplishments is defending the rights of immigrants against nativist bastards then we all took a sample citizenship test, guess who got none wrong on the test and guess who got only half the questions right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I believe it
I'll believe anything about people's ignorance of the constitution. When polled, many Americans disagree with the Bill of Rights when read to them, without being identified as the Bill of Rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I was the one who aced it obviously Dook
These assholes were spitting on immmigrants, I am very pro immigrant because of what my first generation american grandparents went through and its just my nature to care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. well that's probably
because they teach better in Massachusetts, where you're from despite your ludicrous claims to the contrary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. haha, it sure felt like I was in Massachuetts the other day
Finding out that many I know support gay marriage but that was only our Dem Caucus in model congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
34. Greetings from MassaBluesetts
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Hey love your state, you got two great senators
I just got a good governor here in Virginia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Why does the Supreme Court get to decide______?"
I weep for my country, when I read that one.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. one I have is that people expect the same primary candidates
from last year to magically all be in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Floogeldy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not necessarily on DU, but . . .
. . . some people think they have a right of free speech on message boards and cannot be censored.

I also notice a lot of confusion about the Establishment Clause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Marbury v. Madison also got skipped in school, apparently.
I read a lot of postings that make it pretty clear that that wasn't covered in their American Government classes.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Judicial Review, I leanred that one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Floogeldy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Have you noticed . . .
. . . the neocons have started to attack the validity of M v. M.

Unbelievable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. oh
they've done that for years.

The freepers are still mad about direct election of Senators. Some of these people really hold grudges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Good one...
yes, we had a good flame war last week about this. People believed that it was unconstitutional to fire anybody for their speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Floogeldy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. I missed that
Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. relating to that guy I dont wanna talk about because
some of the stuff said made me not feel so good?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. yes
but it went far beyond the discussion of tenure. Some believed that ANY negative repercussions for offensive speech was a violation of the person's civil rights.

I asked about 5 times and never got an adequate answer to the question: then was it wrong for Ann Coulter's syndicator to drop her after she advocated invading all muslim countries, killing their leaders and converting them to christianity? Should the syndicator have been legally compelled to continue carrying her column?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Well you know, sad to say people have double standards
I know that from being in GD in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. Why do you hate America?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
20. So you assume Democrats are what? Somehow congenitally smart?
90% of people are working on 3-cylinders anyway and it does not matter their politics.

Democrats have a rougher time since by philosophy we believe in equality.

But, I gotta' tell you, its harder each day to believe all people were created equal when experience shows just the opposite. There is no doubt that all of us deserves dignity and our say, but that does not mean I want some folks driving the bus, especially when I see so many out where the buses don't run.

My favorite around here?

"Why can't Bill Clinton run for president?"

(22nd Amendment)

Followed by....

"We should have different laws for citizens and 'furnurs'."

(14th Amendment)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. no, not democrats in particular
but democrats who actively seek out a political discussion board. Evidently they have an interest in politics and government, and I'd expect such people to read the basic defining document of our system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SariesNightly Donating Member (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. All I want to know
is the names of the bastards who banned secession!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. They were called
the Union Army.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. hahah
Including one of my ancestors :). Yeah I can see EXACTLY why this is a pet peeve of yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. My great-great-great-grandfather
was in the uniformed honor guard when President Lincoln gave a little speech in Gettysburg. I just found that out a couple years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Thats Awesome! *said in the best DSM voice*
Really, thats cool. My ancestor had been discharged by then though. Really I can see why all this bugs you, I dont care what party youre in or whether we agree on the issues or not, read the fucking document so you understand things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alwynsw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
27. Who needs to know about the Constitution
whe you've got TV and beer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. because
sadly, if we put the Bill of Rights up for a vote, it would probably lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alwynsw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. I agree. Forgot my sarcasm tag.
I'm in your corner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
30. From the debates, shrub said this regarding the constitution

He was arguing a point and he said,

"That's not what the constitution says. It says, (pause)...
That's not what the constitution says!"

The so-called Pres. doesn't know the constitution...so why is it surprising that most citizens don't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Again
it's not surprising, just disappointing. As I said above, I would expect people self-selected for an interest in politics and government (i.e., the DU membership) would have a better understanding of the basics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Floogeldy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
32. Speaking of constitutional ignorance . . .
Here's one even most, if not all, judges seem to currently ignore: The Ninth Amendment

"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

The implications of this amendment would be great if anyone gave it the weight it probably deserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. yeah
that one seems to have gone by the wayside. I'm not sure how the courts have managed to effectively abolish it.

You would think Oregon's assisted suicide law or California's medical marijuana law would be protected by this amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. well, maybe there should be more links and education
from those here who learned a bit more in high school or college. Or at least a bibliography... does the Demopedia have one?

I am always shocked when people don't know about the three branches of government and their functions. Or the names of their legislators. Or where their voting place is. Etc.


"Light a candle, don't curse the darkness." ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. that is a good point
alas, it's hard to force-feed the information to people. Most of the basic ideas can be understood by reading one general-knowledge book on the subject.

I'll check my library and see if one or two really stand out as exceptional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
miss_kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
38. I'm sure though, with all the EXTRA-LEGAL shit the cheney bush junta
is doing AND getting away with makes it confusing for the already poorly educated masses.

I mean you have a bunch of fucking assholes in this country who think Bill Clinton getting a blow job from an adult woman then lying about it, is much much worse than the junta's crimes against humanity, war crimes and, as a matter of fact, think it's JUSTIFIABLE to remove the right of due process from certain individuals, to torture and to wage an illegal immoral war against civilians in an oil-rich country. To send our own sons and daughters (not theirs) to die and be maimed and damaged in this fight for the junta's interests, and not attend one funeral. To cover-up the dead by banning the 'free press' from publishing photos of caskets of soldiers.

And you have the 'free press' who marches in lock step with the junta, a bunch of talking heads who spew misinformation at every turn.

So I am not surprised people are stupid about the Bill of Rights, The Constitution or the Declaration of Independence, or what any of that shit means. Except the 2nd Amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Floogeldy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Well said!
And don't forget lying about WMD.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC