Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Binomials....I Don't Get It

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 07:41 PM
Original message
Binomials....I Don't Get It
Any mathletes wanna help me out and solve for x?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Damn math jokes!
Binomials I can do. Trinomials present more of a problem. Monomials, however, are fun!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldeneye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Like foiling?
I love that stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. By binomials do you mean the distibution
or simply solving an equation such as (x + 6)(x + 12) = 36
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Well, actually I just wanted to be an ass.
But I figure y'all know that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zing Zing Zingbah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. For a problem like this you could use the
Quadratic Equation to solve for x.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gtp1976 Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. x=9 btw. hehe n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zing Zing Zingbah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Actually...
(x+6)(x+12) = 36

No way is the answer is x = 9.

Plug in x = 9 into the equation and see what you get.
(9+6)(9+12)=(15)(21)=315

OK, I think you were kidding when you gave that answer. I'm just going to solve this anyhow because I'm a major geek.

(x+6)(x+12) = x^2 + 6x + 12x + 72 = x^2 + 18x + 72 = 36

x^2 + 18x + 36 = 0

Use the Quadratic formula to find the roots, which will be the answer.

for ax^2 + bx + c = 0

x =( -b +|- sqrt(b^2 - 4ac))/2a

a = 1 b = 18 c = 36

x = (-18 +|- sqrt(18^2 - 4(1)(36)))/2(1)
x = (-18 +|- sqrt(180))/2
x = -9 +|- 3/2*sqrt(20)
x = -9 + -1.5*sqrt(20) and x = -9 + 1.5*sqrt(20)
x is about -15.7 and -2.3

Check x = -9 + 1.5*sqrt(20) by substituting into original equation
(-9 + 1.5*sqrt(20)+ 6)(-9 + 1.5*sqrt(20) + 12)=
(-3 + 1.5*sqrt(20))(3+ 1.5*sqrt(20)) =
-9 + 4.5*sqrt(20) + -4.5*sqrt(20) + (1.5)(1.5)(sqrt(20))(sqrt(20))=
-9 + 45 = 36

Check x = -9 + -1.5*sqrt(20) by substituting into original equation
(-9 + -1.5*sqrt(20) + 6)(-9 + -1.5*sqrt(20) + 12)=
(-3 + -1.5*sqrt(20))(3 + -1.5*sqrt(20))=
-9 + 4.5*sqrt(20) + -4.5*sqrt(20) + (-1.5)(-1.5)(sqrt(20))(sqrt(20))=
-9 + 45 = 36

Thanks for all the fun math problems. I don't get to do this kind of crap any more being a stay at home mom.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gtp1976 Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. My mistake...
...I read (x+6)+(x+12)= 36 in which case 9 would = x, rather than (x+6)times(x+12)=36.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zing Zing Zingbah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I see where you got your answer now...
That makes sense. :)

I just noticed that I could have written
3/2sqrt(20) as 3sqrt(5). That would have been a lot simplier, and easy to read. It doesn't really matter anyhow, since they are the same number. I doubt anyone else cares either. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. simultaneous equations left a smoke crater in my mind.
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zing Zing Zingbah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I love solving simultaneous equations.
Augmented matrices are especially useful when solving simultaneous equations. There are tons of applications for simultaneous equations in engineering and computer science (3D Graphics, Robotics, etc.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Ooh, gobzillions of applications....
I was an electrical engineering student, once.... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zing Zing Zingbah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yeah..
I took electrical engineering courses too. I was a computer engineering major, which is kind of a cross between electrical engineering and computer science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. A lot of hardware?
That's what CE ended up being at my school... I kind of wish I'd gone the route of CS/CE, now. I got into database stuff/programming after I left school, and I really enjoy that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zing Zing Zingbah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yeah.. but a lot of programming too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Crap like this was why I dropped my minor in statistics.
And calculus is a thousand times worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zing Zing Zingbah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yeah... it's just using the distributive property...
(a+b)(c+d)

An easy way to see this is to use substitution first. Say substitute e in for c+d.

e = c+d

Now use the distributive property
(a+b)e = ae + be

OK, now substitute c+d back in for e.

a(c+d) + b(c+d)

Notice you have to do distributive property two more times.

ac + ad + bc + bd

The foil technique is just a short cut to getting the same results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. "God made gay sex, not 3 + x."
...should anyone desire a mindless slogan for his next parade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC