Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Terrible dream last night

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
DeposeTheBoyKing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:01 PM
Original message
Terrible dream last night
I dreamed that my husband was angry at the way I organized the DVDs and told me he wanted a divorce. He went so far as to challenge the equitable distribution of our property in defiance of state law. Later he calmed down and changed his mind, but when I woke up I was very disturbed. Later I dreamed that I was romantically involved with a man who looked like a cross between Ted Levine ("Stottlemyer" on "Monk") and my Property professor. What is wrong with me??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Are you a 1L or 2L?
Law school seems to bring out the strangest things in people.

I had dreams of my torts professor following me around with Prosser for most of my first semester. It wouldn't have been so bad but in the dream I was trying to research the Rule Against Perpetuities. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeposeTheBoyKing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm a 3L!!
Oh, God - the LAST thing you want to research is the Rule Against Perpetuities!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Still having nightmares.
Third year, last semester? Hang in there. I think all it means is that you are working out some of the material in your sleep, probably with the subliminal anxieties of the encroaching bar exam.

In my third year I had some anxieties about finally getting out there and practicing. It kind of freaked me out when I realize that people would be relying on me after I had just spent three years waiting for someone from the Dean or admission's office coming up to me and saying, "oops, you shouldn't really be here." But that's just me and my low self-esteem issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Threads like this make me nervous. I'll be 1L next fall. Not helping!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeposeTheBoyKing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You'll be dreaming about Property, I assure you
It's THE hardest class you'll have in law school (although the first semester of Civil Procedure was no picnic).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Civ Pro
You have just entered the "Pennoyer v. Neff" zone.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeposeTheBoyKing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Shudder
I got called on for "International Shoe" on the 4th day of class. I was asked to frame an argument for SOMETHING - it's a blur. I can just now "frame an argument" - you expected me to do that the 4th day of law school???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Frame an argument, lol
had enough trouble distinguishing between "stream of commerce" and "stream of consciousness"

Fortunately for me I had worked for an attorney before going to law school. I had gone to work there so I would get a better idea if it was something I wanted to devote my life to. I liked it and after a few months I started helping one of our law student employees doing research. That's when I began learning how to frame arguments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Wow that's great news.
:o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Don't worry
For one thing, you won't be going through the "clueless" process on your own. You'll have a couple of hundred people in more or less the same boat.

One of the first things they do is assign you to a "small section." For me it was contracts. There were only 20 of us in the class so we developed some close friendships.

The best class, from my perspective, in your 1L year is research and writing. Just keep in mind that the Harvard Blue Book citations aren't the ones you'll be using in court. It is mostly for Law Review and other journals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Thanks! I read One L, the book, it was similar to what you
describe. I take comfort in not being the only one in my class who will be wearing a relative cloak of ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeposeTheBoyKing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Legal Writing is the most important class you'll take in law school
They'll change the way you wrote before. That's what law school does; they take out your brain, rearrange it and put it back in.

Read "Law School Confidential," too - lots of good tips. I've also heard good things about "Getting to Maybe," but haven't read that one. I'd avoid "Planet Law School" - too frightening and negative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I do own "getting to maybe" but have not read it yet.
I'll take note of "Law School Confidential," thanks! I have a couple others, "Acing your first year of Law School," or something, etc. Trying to prep myself as much as possible without actually learning anything specific on my own (if I tried to learn the basics of properites on my own now, I would undoubtedly confuse myself).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeposeTheBoyKing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Don't go out and buy all the E&Es now, either
"Examples and Explanations." While valuable (especially for Civ Pro), you won't help yourself any by reading them now. Enjoy your spring and summer and don't start reading law books yet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Don't worry, I am trying to soak up as many novels as possible now
because I think I may be taking a three-year vacation from those :(

But god, I can't WAIT to start school. I am so damn excited to quit my job and rejoin academia and spend all day studying and learning. Hello life of student loans and scholarships, here I come. Thank you for your advice, I was thinking of making a post somewhere to have law students and lawyers check in, so I could get a buddy list going. Might be nice to have a resource of people on the internet.

Thanks again...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. The number one rule is
"no question is stupid." Really, it is that simple. Sometimes everything falls into place once once small nagging detail is explained.

My "trick" in property classes was to try to find an everyday analogies to the cases I read to help remember some of the rulings. For example, I remember Pierson v. Post to this day (I think it is an 1805 case) because it reminds me of what happens everyday in parking lots.

The rule in Pierson v. Post is basically that pursuit alone vests no property or right in the huntsman unless the animal is actually taken. In otherwords, being the first to spot an empty parking stall doesn't guarantee that you will end up parking in it. If someone else gets to it first it becomes their "property" to the exclusion of all others.

As for the "dreaded" Rule Against Perpetuities (no interest is good unless it must vest, if at all, no later than 21 years after the death of some life in being at the creation of the interest) and its various conditions (contigent remainders, executory interests, etc.) by watching old movies. You know the ones involving plots with inheritances and its conditions. VIVA TCM! Okay, it was an excuse to goof off but, with my imagination, it was easier to remember when thinking up my own contrived "old movie plots" while studying.

But then, I'm a little different. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. That is good, I am a question asker and used to drive my TAs crazy
Good to know that is a useful skill in law school, I'm good at it :P

I assume when a text states, "no interest is good unless it must vest, if at all, no later than 21 years after the death of some life in being at the creation of the interest," once can find somewhere an explanation in layman's terms?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. You'll understand it by the end of semester
You also have a resource that I didn't have, the internet:

http://dictionary.law.com/default2.asp?typed=rule+against+perpetuities&type=1&submit1.x=0&submit1.y=0&submit1=Look+up

ule against perpetuities
n. the legal prohibition against tying up property so that it cannot be transferred or vest title in another forever, for several future generations, or for a period of centuries. The maximum period in which real property title may be held without allowing title to vest in another is "lives in being plus 21 years." Therefore, a provision in a deed or will which reads, "Title shall be held by David Smith and, upon his death, title may only be held by his descendants until the year 2200, when it shall vest in the Trinity Episcopal Church," is invalid, but a provision that "the property will be held by my son George for his life, and thereafter by his son, Thomas, and for 20 years by his future children, before it may be conveyed (transferred) " is acceptable under the rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fit4life Donating Member (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Strange.
I had a dream last week were Chandler from "Friends" pushed me off a cliff. My fiance's sister was involved somehow too. When I climbed back up (even with a badly broken foot!) and asked him why he did it, he said it was because I "know everything!"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. LOL
The only time I "know everything" seems to be in my dreams too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. I don't know...
...how were you organizing the DVD's? If my wife organized my DVD's in a weird way i might ask for a divorce too. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeposeTheBoyKing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I know where it came from
He was visiting over the weekend (he's in Dallas, I'm in Pittsburgh), and he was "tsk-tsk"-ing about the number of DVDs I have purchased while we've been apart. It's okay for HIM to buy things, but when I do it, it's a waste of money. Most of the DVDs I got for $5-$14, which I consider pretty darn good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. My Mom went to Pitt Law
You're in law school in Pittsburgh. I'm assuming you're at Pitt right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeposeTheBoyKing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Yes, I am! When did she graduate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Um....
...good question. Early Nineties? Maybe like '92. She went back to school as an old fogie after her kids fled the nest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeposeTheBoyKing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Good for her! I'm an old fogey myself
Started law school the day before I turned 40 (I'll be 42 when I graduate). I have a classmate who's in her 60s; she's a social worker who decided to get a master's in law and then went for the JD. She's never missed a day of classes. I think she and I are the only ones who actually LOVE law school!

Is your mother practicing in Pittsburgh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Naw
They moved, ironically enough, to Dallas right after she graduated. She passed the bar there and practiced for a while. She's semi-retired now, just does pro-bono work etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Same here
I was in my mid-thirties when I started and late-thirties when I finished. It's incredible that three short years can move you from a "mid" to a "late."

At our first small section party a conversation got started about music. It turned into a discussion of the first "record" each of us had purchased. At my age I was thinking vinyl while everyone else was talking CDs. Thankfully, I have/had my immaturity to fall back on to help fit in. They all had a good laugh at my description of my "Mickey Mouse" phonograph that I used to play "The Doors" album on. The needle was in Mickey's glove. I "bought" the album from my older brother for a quarter (because he had two).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
24. Ted Levine also played "Buffalo Bill", so he's always creepy in my book
"It puts the lotion on it's skin, or else it gets the hose again".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeposeTheBoyKing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Yes - that movie is very scary!
Think he's a terrific actor, though. I just don't know why I dreamed about him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC