Serious Linux bug! - Democratic Underground

qnr

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Jan-09-05 08:55 PM
Original message

Poll question: Serious Linux bug!

According to Pavel Machek, he has discovered a serious bug in the 2.4 kernel. On January 1st, 9,223,372,034,708,485,227, every single computer running the 2.4 kernels will stop processing commands!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Solon

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Jan-09-05 08:59 PM
Response to Original message

1. Hah!!!!

No need to worry, I got 2.6 kernel, so I don't have to worry about any of that till the cold death of the Universe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

qnr

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Jan-09-05 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #1

2. Me too. And 2.2 on one of my Ataris, so I'm safe, no 2.4 kernels anywhere

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Deja Q

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Jan-09-05 09:04 PM
Response to Original message

3. Mmmm... kernels. Popcorn! ROTFLMAO!

Edited on Sun Jan-09-05 09:05 PM by HypnoToad

:D

Oh, I can't vote. I upgraded to Kernel 2.6 some time ago. :7

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

qnr

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Jan-09-05 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #3

7. actually, I just made some. Wonder where I got the idea? n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Lithos

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Jan-09-05 09:07 PM
Response to Original message

4. Sounds like a good reason to go to 2.6

Oh, wait, maybe I'll have time to go to 2.8 if I'm lucky.

L-

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

qnr

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Jan-09-05 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #4

5. Gonna be tight, not a lot of time left... n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

RoyGBiv

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Jan-09-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message

6. Some people ...

...have WAY too much free time. :-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

qnr

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Jan-09-05 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #6

8. Really! Um.... wait... who was that directed at? :) n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

RoyGBiv

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Jan-09-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #8

9. The other guy ...

The one who thought it might actually be useful to let us know that a few trillion years from now, our copies of Linux might not work.

:-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Commie Pinko Dirtbag

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jan-10-05 10:15 AM
Response to Original message

10. Oh NO! Linux is UTTERLY FLAWED! Windows XP, here I go! (nt)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

qnr

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jan-10-05 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #10

11. I feel SO embarrassed for advocating it n/t

Edited on Mon Jan-10-05 01:10 PM by qnr

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

WannaJumpMyScooter

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jan-10-05 07:21 PM
Response to Original message

12. I predict the silcon in the chips will decay to something else

long before that happens.
Still, I am glad I have 2.6.... TLP might be up to 3.0 before that, but then, maybe not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Sun May 05th 2024, 09:42 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.