Take that BAD HUSBANDS. You too could be convicted of murder

[genius]

I was half expecting Peterson to get nailed for being a bad husband. Kicking "non-guilty" jurors off the jury will turn out to be a costly mistake that the tax payers will have to pay. It would have been better if the prosecution had some EVIDENCE of murder. The conviction will never hold. I wouldn't be surprised if he did it but I haven't seen any evidence.

It's intereting that the whole case in the Cinton impeachment trial was that he was a BAD HUSBAND who lied about being a BAD HUSBAND.

[maxsolomon]

1. who is "peterson"?

and why don't i give a fuck?

[Shakespeare]

2. We don't know that's why those jurors were recused. n/t

[Mojambo]

3. We will when they appeal. n/t

[JVS]

4. Being a bad husband rocks!

It's like being a cowboy, astronaut and gangster all rolled into one.

[izzie]

5. I did not watch much or this but where was the proof?

The body turning up where it did was odd but it could have been just that, I would be just awful on a jury. He did seem like one bad husband but she stayed with him so guess it was OK to her. People stay together for all types of reasons that one can not say is right or wrong.

[Ronnie]

6. "...but I haven't seen any evidence."

Maybe that's because you weren't on the jury. People I know who've been on juries tell me that it's actually nothing like watching it on TV. To quote one of them, "You do really have to be in the courtroom."

[CindyDale]

7. C'mon people

Just because I was preheating an oven, melting chocolate, and had eggs, flour, and sugar out--and then you saw brownies on my table--that doesn't prove I made brownies, does it?

Cindy

[plcdude]

8. you bought them

but were attempting to convince us that you can cook. Is it not true that you recently were seen in a grocery store buying items?

[CindyDale]

9. Yeah,

and they do look just like Albertson's brownies, don't they? I'm guilty.

Cindy