|
Let's just take the example of where Titor mentions "A skyscraper missing in New York." Notice the singular?? Yet, we are missing TWO skyscraper in New York...both WTC1 and 2...also WTC7, so, technically, THREE!! Is is possible this was NOT a reference to 9/11...but maybe a reference to the building they are planning in PLACE OF the WTC, and he could be referring to a future event that has YET to be fulfilled?
Unless I am mistaken, WTC is to be replaced by a SINGLE skyscraper, that is 1,776 feet tall? ONE skyscraper!!
Perhaps THIS one gets attacked later? and that THIS is the "A skyscraper missing in New York" that he's referring to, and NOT 9/11?
After all, if he really WAS from 2036...this building would have been built by then, and conceivably could get attacked and brought down again by that time. Possible, do you suppose...that this reference of Titor's speaks of an event YET TO HAPPEN...and we are misinterpreting it to refer to 9/11, when, in fact, it may refer to an entirely different event?
And, again, I certainly believe that the idea that Titor is a complete hoax...is a valid theory...every bit as valid as the theory that titor is exactly what he said he was. I've not researched enough yet to have formed an opinion one way or another. I just think this makes a fascinating study!
I'd love to hear from others, as to their thoughts and theories on John Titor...especially if they have researched it far longer than I have...perhaps can point me to places to see other stuff I have not yet seen...and, through posting of their own thoughts...help me to formulate my own thoughts concerning John Titor.
I have a very open mind...this is just something I wished to throw out there, and get some dialogue started among some other Titor researchers. Please, continue to feel free...believers, debunkers, doubters, open-minded folks...whatever...to post here...and state your beliefs concerning Titor...and why you believe as you do.
again, I just find this to be a quite fascinating case study.
I do find it difficult to believe that such an elaborate hoax could have been carried out by a single human being, without a single screwup. Maybe "John Titor" was a group of people? Has anyone ever advanced that notion? It is fairly certain, from what I've seen...that John Titor was not even his REAL NAME...he, imself had said it was an alias.
|